Beliefs Of The Multiple Facets Of Epiphenomenalism

Improved Essays
In my third reflection paper I will summarize my beliefs of the multiple facets of dualism and in particular about epiphenomenalism. Epiphenomenalism is viewed as a type of property dualism and is basically the idea that mental events are caused due to physical events in the brain. In other words, the mental emerges from the physical! To better understand this idea I thought that the idea of fear would be interesting to look at. According to epiphenomenalism it is not fear, which makes your heart beat faster but the state of your nervous system is what makes your heart beat faster. Also look at the idea of anger. According to epiphenomenalism it is not anger, which makes your heart beat faster and makes your face turn red but the neural impulses, nervous system, and other physical events in your brain that causes you to turn red and makes your heart beat faster.
I believe that the idea of epiphenomenalism is not very convincing. The concept of epiphenomenalism is very hard for
…show more content…
To summarize, substance dualism is the idea that both the mental and the physical exist. Both the mental and the physical are separate of one another and are independent of one another. To believe in the idea of an afterlife (I believe in an afterlife) I believe that one must believe in substance dualism to a certain extent. The “soul” or the mental substance is what continues to live on after the bodily or physical substances death. Physical substances, like are bodies, do not have thoughts but the mental substances like are minds do! The human mind (mental substance) is different from the human brain (physical substance). When a person dies the human brain (physical substance) is buried but the human mind (mental substance) lives on. A mental substance does not exist physically in the physical world just like a physical substance does not exist in

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This belief in philosophy that the mind, soul, or conscious is independent from the body is referred to as Cartesian dualism; in other words, if the body dies the mind does not. Trying to distinct the mind from the body has been a topic in philosophy since Rene Descartes, one of the most influential founders. In one of Descartes first essays, the ‘Second Meditation: Of the Human Mind’, he wrote about how he believed that the mind and the body were two separate entities and self is distinct from the body. On the other hand, there are plenty of respected philosophers that believe Descartes’s look on our mind and body is wrong; these people call themselves Anti-Cartesians. Sir Peter Strawson, a very well-known Anti-Cartesian stated, the mind is…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    IHUM 202 Name¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_______________Nhi Tran__________________ Reading Questions A Discourse on Method 1. As he meditates on and develops his method for finding scientific truths, Descartes debates whether he should sweep away old notions (existing knowledge and philosophies) or build upon them. Which option does he reason is the most effective for him and why?…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Epiphenomenalism Analysis

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Critical Analysis ‘Epihenomenalism and Eliminativism’ Trenton Merricks In this paper, I will be presenting a critical analysis of Trenton Merricks’s ‘Epiphenomenalism and Eliminativism’ (2001). Merricks delivers a strong argument for the elimination of non-living macro-physical objects, and the denial of causal powers that these types of objects may be said to have: he labels this argument the ‘overdetermination argument’, which he illustrates with an example of a baseball shattering a window. I wish to object to the elimination of non-living macro-physical objects by accounting for the plausibility of macro-causation. I intend to provide objections and responses to premises 1-3 of Merricks’s argument.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    I fully agree with Descartes’s concept of dualism. The mind is a lot more than chemical reactions going on in the brain. Thoughts, feelings, desire are all properties of the mind but not its parts. I…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though the brain states can be studied and explained through science; mental states are unexplainable and there are not able to be scientifically examined. However, this means that when the brain (body) dies then so does the mind since it is derived through the brain (Mohn, 2017). Within property dualist, there is epiphenomenalism which believes that the physical world influences our mental states but out mental states cannot influence our brain states. Or there is interactionism where one believes that mental states such as our desires provide guidance to our brain states (Mohn,…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substance dualism is the ontological view that there exists two sorts of substances; mental and physical (material and immaterial). The existence of the substances are fundamentally distinct and exist independently of each other. If the soul can survive the death of the body, then there is the possibility of an after-life. Plato and Descartes are notorious for substance dualism which is also known as mind-body dualism, the believe that the soul is able to live on without the presence of the physical substance, the body. In this essay I will describe and assess the argument of substance dualism postulated by Rene Descartes (1596-1650).…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.) In “Behaviorism, Materialism and Functionalism” Paul M. Churchland writes that reductive materialism is a theory of mind which states that “mental states are physical states of the brain” (311) in other words a mental states will reflect a particular physical state of the brain, additionally it also relies heavily on “folk psychology”. Folk psychology is a “commonsense psychological framework” that seeks to explain the parallel between mind and behavior. On the other hand Eliminative materialism, proposes that there can be no relationship between folk psychology and neuroscience, as Churchland writes, “ commonsense psychological framework is a false and radically misleading conception of the cause of human behavior and the nature of cognitive…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I argue that substance dualism is true. Substance dualism claims that people and bodies are distinct. People, such as you and I, are nonphysical beings. We are connected human bodies, but we are not bodies. The reason is that (1) If we can exist without bodies, then we cannot be bodies.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    British empiricism is the thought that knowledge comes from sensory perception while discarding the idea that thoughts are innate. John Locke was a British empiricist who believed that our minds were blank slates and that we learned from experiences. This makes Locke in empiricist because this notion rejects the idea of being born with innate thoughts. Locke did not dismiss that we may have innate abilities such as the ability to think in general but he argued that all of our knowledge was based off of sensory experiences. While some things may seem to become innate thought like the smell of rain; Locke argued that we experience things so many times that they seem to become innate.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To commence with, there are so many different cultural group in the world, especially in religion such as Christian and Muslim. One of the similarity between the major religions in the world is that they are almost all dualist. They believed the idea that mind and body are separate. For me, actually i don't believe in any religion, i am non-religious people, an atheist. Nonetheless, i'm still share the opinion that mind and body are separate.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.is composed of two substances: mind and body. One is physical and one is non-phyical. Rene Descartes views on dualism are known as substance and simple dualism. He believed that reality was composed of two substances, one being the mind which consists of inmaterial thing such as thoughts and emotions.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism is the idea that the mind and body are separate entities. Descartes saw the body as matter and geometrical qualities (legs, arms, feet, etc.), and the mind as one with the basic feature of thinking, that occurs in a spiritual realm. He stated that the body could never think and that the mind could not exist physically, in other words mental states could never explain physical things. He thought that the body was associated with matter and could be described as to having an extension, and the mind can not have an extension, or take up space, as it does not exist in a physical world (Leech, Oliver). Advocates of dualism, like Descartes, run into trouble on how to explain how the mental states and physical world interact and communicate.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Without a doubt everything we do in life is uncertain. This ambiguous trait of life is what keeps life full of interest, but this also provides significance and value in the real world. However, up front the duality of human nature should be taken into account. Duality in psychology is important for our lives as it is a ‘twofold’ division. There can be two separate and independent forces or ways in order to think but at the end of the day both are equal, and have the same logical reasoning behind it.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the purpose of this presentation is to investigate the personality of Hannibal Leter in terms of the traits, humanistic and psychodynamic conception of personality Gordon Allport claimed that each person exhibits unique qualities: with five main traits that each individual can possesses varying in extents: Extroversion, Agreeableness, Contentiousness, Neuroticism and Openness, with rank high or low to describe a person’s personality Extroversion present high in Hannibal Lecter. Before he was recognized as a serial killer, Lecter portrayed himself to most as a charismatic intellectual, hosting dinner parties and dominating conversations in the movie Red Dragon. He preformed his duties as a psychiatrist admirably and assisting many of his patients.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays