Paul M Churchland Cognitive Materialism Analysis

Improved Essays
1.) In “Behaviorism, Materialism and Functionalism” Paul M. Churchland writes that reductive materialism is a theory of mind which states that “mental states are physical states of the brain” (311) in other words a mental states will reflect a particular physical state of the brain, additionally it also relies heavily on “folk psychology”. Folk psychology is a “commonsense psychological framework” that seeks to explain the parallel between mind and behavior. On the other hand Eliminative materialism, proposes that there can be no relationship between folk psychology and neuroscience, as Churchland writes, “ commonsense psychological framework is a false and radically misleading conception of the cause of human behavior and the nature of cognitive

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Materialism states that nothing exists aside from matter, defined as something that occupies physical space and has mass. Materialism argues that the mind cannot exist as an immaterial object, because nothing immaterial exists, thus the “mind” is really the physical brain, and the apparent “consciousness” is just the brain undergoing physical reactions to produce mental states such as processing emotions, problem solving, and visualization, things a Dualist would categorize as the “mind”. A counterargument to materialism is this: 1. Based off of experience, it is known that one can produce a mental image in their head—for this example, a box.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He yearns to reduce this entire thing in materialistic terms, yet still preserving the humanistic qualities. He does this by stating mental states are identical with physical states. Although they have this relationship mental states are identical inner states and behavior is an outer state. Thus, this means that if one targets the correct area of the brain he can eliminate these mental states leaving being an animal of stimuli. All of these perspectives shed an illuminating light on the issues of physicalism and dualism which is to be debated for years to come.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A physicalist believes that any mental state, such as emotions or disorders, can be understood and explained in entirety by simply examining the physical brain. Physicalists accept that everything in the universe falls within the realm of the physical, for this reason they “hold that complete physical knowledge is complete knowledge” (291). The main difference between physicalism and its easily-confused counterpart, materialism, is that physicalism holds a wider definition of what it means to be physical. According to Jackson, physicalism includes “everything in completed physics, chemistry and neurophysiology” rather than materialism’s belief that everything is tied to a material interaction (291). In other words, physicalism maintains that if knowledge of the physical world is understood completely, there is nothing else that we can learn.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This belief the mind and the brain are related to each other as two distinct sorts of properties. The mind is believed to emerges from the brain but it is not dependent upon it. One could visualize this ideology as the brain as a snow cloud and the mind the unique, independent snowflakes that fall from it. The mind is seen as something spiritual and the body is physical. Since the mind comes from the brain; the brain contains both physical and spiritual properties (Mohn, 2017).…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Cognitive Perspective is considered to be a relatively new or modern approach in the field of psychology in regards to the study human behavior that started gaining attention around the late 1950s leading to what is also known as the “Cognitive Revolution” during which the definition of psychology started to deviate from the inclination to be classified as a study of behaviour given that pre-1950s, psychology was deemed as the study of behaviour by experimental psychologists who were influenced by the work of psychologists going along the lines of Pavlov’s work which emphasized on behaviorism arguing that the most objectively observable evidence is that which can be seen externally i.e., behavioral (Miller, 2003) The cognitive perspective allowed researches to come up with conclusions regarding the characteristics of cognitive processes through the observation of certain behaviours in terms of consistency in behaviour, measurable by the rate of forgetting and reaction. The major emphasis of the cognitive perspective leans towards the study of cognitive function as the name suggests or in other words, the study of mental processes inclusive of but not limited to; attention, memory, language, perception and thinking. (McLeod, S. A. 2008)…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I turn back to my subject: the attempt to work out an account of mind within the framework of the physico-chemical view of man.” So now, back to those two types of Behaviorism. There is Crude behaviorism and Rylean behaviorism. Crude being that the mind is simply an outward act. Instead of the mind being behind the behavior, it is a part of the physical behavior.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    components could impact physical symptoms of loss of movement, as demonstrated in the Anna O case. The behaviourist approach has additionally been connected in this present reality in the treatment of phobias and education. Classical conditioning has been connected to methodical desensitisation, and this has been useful in helping individuals manage fears. The principles of the Operant conditioning have been applied in education, serving to underlie successful teaching. Positive feedback and discipline have helped shape behaviour in the classroom.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In support of Patricia S. Churchland’s neurophilosophical argument that the brain/mind is our self, I will further argue that our various brain structures, functions, and the related body systems contribute to the important expressive aspects of the self, giving self its valued, unique identities. In her book, Touching a Nerve: The Self as Brain, Churchland uses a map analogy to introduce the brain’s relationship to the self. Although the brain creates a map that “constitutes a representation of certain relevant aspects of the environment,” Churchland emphasizes that the “brain does what brains do” and that “there is no separate me that reads my brain’s maps” (34). Individual selves are differentiated through meaningful expression.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analyzing “Brainology” In the following essay, we will analyze and discuss the article “Brainology” by Carol Dweck. Starting off by the title, the opening paragraphs, the claim, the author’s purpose, methods, persona and closing paragraphs as well. Because I believe Dweck’s article was more effective than ineffective, reasons of why I believe she could've done a better work will be discussed and explained in short. The title the author chooses for this article, “ Brainology”, introduces the audience to what she will be talking about, it is important to point out that the word “brainology’ induces us to think of a very broad topic which could be understood as a study of the brain.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eliminative materialism is the view that in order to recognize and describe what exists in the world, it is necessary to eliminate anything mental, such as the mind, mental states and mental properties. In addition, eliminative materialism stresses on the assumption that folk psychology is an outdated theory that must be eliminated, as behaviours are neurological processes and not caused by mental states. In this paper, I will be criticizing eliminative materialism by explaining the importance of folk psychology as how it is necessary to understand mental states and decisions during certain situations. Folk psychology is the theory in which it explains the behaviours of humans and nonhumans according to their beliefs, desires and other propositional…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I shall outline the Representational Theory of Mind, and in doing so, will explore some of its key features, and concepts that are implicit in the theory. I will give particular attention to Fodor and his (1975) Language of Thought Hypothesis, wherein cognition involves the medium of representation, sharing its central properties with principles found in linguistics. I will then describe reasons for thinking that all of cognition is representational, focusing on Fodor 's processing argument, which is grounded on the nature of cognition, with its essential characteristics of productivity and systematicity. The cognitive act of rational choice and the requirements for such a capacity will also be examined. Furthermore, after exploring…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rorty’s specific use of language, his narrow concept, and circular argument seem very plausible upon first appearances. I believe his argument about incorrigibility is correct but it just focuses on the wrong type of mentality. Regardless of which he chose, a full theory about mentality should ideally encompass both. His belief that mentality is a creation of our society is also doubtable. I believe I have shown how this view is problematic.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their writings, Descartes and Berkeley argue the nature of sensible objects. Sensible objects are what are perceivable to the mind. The nature of how these objects are perceived and if, what the mind perceives exists is the foundation of both Descartes and Berkeley’s arguments. Are sensible objects distinctly external matter that are perceived by the mind, or are they created within the distinct mind and perceived directly. The arguments are related to Descartes and Berkeley’s different stances on rationalism and empiricism, or if our minds identify knowledge of sensible objects through experience or innate knowledge.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment 8: Skinner, Freud and Rogers To compare Skinner, Freud, and Rogers, is to compare three of the greats in the field of Psychology. Behaviorism, psychoanalysis, and humanism comprise the garden from which all other theories have grown. While vast differences have historically been observed in these three men and their theoretical perspectives; for those who choose to see, a few startling similarities may be found as well. For someone with little psychological background, who is just beginning to delve into Freud’s theories, it might seem that his beliefs about human behavior are based in cognitive process like Carl Rogers’s humanistic beliefs.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays