Bordo acknowledges that this is still an issue, but she notes that there is an emerging phenomenon where men are beginning to become objectified in advertisements along with women. She claims that men are beginning to be portrayed in ways that highlight their genitals and make them appear to be more feminine. Previously this had been taboo in our predominantly straight culture and only acceptable for gay men. Now, Bordo says this is changing and it is “the male clothing designers who went south and violated [those] really powerful taboos.” (Bodro 189). She wrote this essay in 1999 and this was a time where the macho man was fading and the fashionable man was the new craze in advertisement. So her essay is specific to the time where provocative men were taking over advertisements. It has since changed. The macho man is resurging and starting to match the fashionable man in terms of popularity in …show more content…
From my point of view (a heterosexual white male), society has become accepting of the fact that men can present themselves in a variety of ways. There still is a presence of macho-men and the pressure for men to act manly, but now society has made it okay for men to care about their fashion and appearance. As a result of this societal acceptance, ads targeting men now typically contain one of two archetypes; the macho man or the fashionable man, (and rarely a mix of both). These two types of ads present men in different ways, but they have a common theme of putting males in the spotlight and making them the centerpiece. Often times this gives male consumers false ideas of what being a man