This implication corresponds with the assumption of scientism, as included in the biomedical model, in that there is a wide held belief that “science is the truth” (Whelan, 2014e). When discussing possible causes for the disease among members of the CDC, one of the main questions asked in regards to information presented was “do you think this or do you know it?” This question was continuously asked with the insinuation that if the presented idea could not be scientifically proven with factual evidence, the information was useless as people would not pay attention to or believe in these findings. Specifically, this issue is demonstrated when members of the CDC expressed concern that the nation’s blood supply may be contaminated from donors with AIDS, yet since they were unable to provide scientific evidence, blood bank executives did not find it beneficial or necessary to test and monitor the nation’s blood
This implication corresponds with the assumption of scientism, as included in the biomedical model, in that there is a wide held belief that “science is the truth” (Whelan, 2014e). When discussing possible causes for the disease among members of the CDC, one of the main questions asked in regards to information presented was “do you think this or do you know it?” This question was continuously asked with the insinuation that if the presented idea could not be scientifically proven with factual evidence, the information was useless as people would not pay attention to or believe in these findings. Specifically, this issue is demonstrated when members of the CDC expressed concern that the nation’s blood supply may be contaminated from donors with AIDS, yet since they were unable to provide scientific evidence, blood bank executives did not find it beneficial or necessary to test and monitor the nation’s blood