It is important to note that most philosophical debate can be said to be focused on the belief that, God cannot exist with, or would want to prevent all evils this is according to 3 and 6 belief stated above. On the other hand, the defenders of theism according to …(.) argues that God could exist and yet allow evil so as to achieve a greater good. The proposal of a greater good ideology is expressed by Alvin (1974) as free will defense. He believe moral evil is as a result of free human action and also that there is a mighty nonhuman spirit (Alvin, 1979) called Satan who is fully responsible for the natural evils for example; earthquakes, diseases, tidal waves, Tsunamis etc. It is widely acceptable that Alvin has successfully solves the logical problem of evil existence by showing that both God and evil can are logically compatible (Chad, 2009) But others stull do not believe in such logical …show more content…
The present of an “All knowing tree” which Adam and Eve eat from considering the fact that such tree was created by God who knew the capacity of such tree even though he warned Adam and Eve not to eat of that particular tree, he instructed them that the day they eat of such tree they will sure die yet Adam and Eve eat of such tree and evil became manifested in their characters and livelihood. As a result of such action, God cursed the ground for Adam and cursed Eve. These became the origin of evil in the world of man. (Gen, 2 v 1-15) Another example from the Bible is regarding the story of Noah according to Gen chapter 6:
“I have determined to make an end of all flesh, for the earth is filled with violence because of them; now I am going to destroy them along with the earth” (Bible gateway, 2014) The above passage indicated how God destroyed the earth by killing everyone except Noah and his family. Critics usually use this scripture to indicate that God is not all loving and good as the claimed is made (Russel, 2002) rather they believe God is the cause of