Julian's Theory Of Evil

Good Essays
The problem of evil is an atheistic argument, against the existence of God. It is a deductive argument that pits the existence of unjustified evil against the existence of any kind of divine being. Julian of Norwich presents a response to the problem of evil, but there are also some possible holes in Julian’s theory. This paper explores the problem of evil and how it is connected to human suffering, Julian’s theory in response to the problem, and a critique of Julian’s theory.
One must assume that an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God exists. He is omnipotent because he has complete, unlimited and unmatched power. He is omniscient because he knows and understands everything. He is omnibenevolent because he will always act in moral
…show more content…
Natural evil may also be called unjustified, as it cannot be justified by reason or explanation. The problem of evil is relying on the existence of natural evil. It cannot use metaphysical evil because by definition it depends on God’s existence. The evil exists simply because God exists and is perfect. It cannot use moral evil because this can be explained by the necessary existence of free will. Humans are able to sin because they have free will to obey or disobey God. If God made creatures that automatically loved him, it would not be real love, but a robotic semblance of a relationship. The argument must rely on natural evil because it does appear that these things are caused by man’s choices or God’s power. Once it is assumed that God exists, and proven that natural evil exists, it must be shown that it is impossible for the two to exist in the same universe. If God is omnipotent, or all powerful, he would have the ability to create a world without evil. His omnipotence gives his the ability to create each of the infinite possible universes. Among those infinite possibilities, there would be another infinite number of universes without evil. If God is omniscient, he would fully know and fully understand …show more content…
Julian of Norwich had an encounter with Jesus in a vision, which she writes about in her Revelations of Divine Love. Primarily, Julian discusses that God has purpose in everything and causes everything. She believes that God does all things and God does all things for good. She repeats the phrase, “all shall be well.” Julian believes that sin itself is not a thing and it does not have substance. When people discuss the problem of evil or sin, they are more accurately talking about the pain that sin causes. The pain is the substance that humans can feel, understand and analyze. This helps bridge the connection between the problem of evil and the problem of human suffering. Without that pain, there is no result or consequence from sin. As mentioned earlier, Julian thinks that God has good reason for everything. She concludes that God’s ultimate desire, and why he allows pain and suffering, is so he can comfort his people. Despite the immense difficulty of life on earth, those who believe in the 3-0 God are offered peace and rest for following him. This peace and rest bring comfort and relationship through God from the pain and suffering caused by sin. God’s good purpose for pain, his plan for “all shall be well,” is for his people to come to him for comfort, peace and rest. Julian, in response to the problem of evil,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In this case, we cannot define this action as an evil that God creates or necessarily warrants. However, evil exists because humans have free will to choose cruelty over good. However, Mackie responds, “why could He not have made men such that they always freely choose the good?” [1;334]. Mill proposes that perhaps, God just didn’t know how. And for the same reasons, this is why God couldn’t make humans to live longer or not wear down.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While the Evil is trying to confuse views, God leads Descartes to true knowledge. If he let the Demon do so, therefore God must be a deceiver too. God is imperfect, which differs from his utter perfection. Therefore, the Evil Demon can not…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Humans cause moral evil. Natural evil is due to natural causes. With moral evil, humans cause their own suffering due to the God-given gift of free will or “free and responsible choice.” “A God who gives humans such free will necessarily brings about the possibility, and puts outside his own control whether or not that evil occurs.” Humans are therefore not responsible for their actions unless they have true choices to…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The major purpose of living is not to acquire all the required comfort or else natural evil would be unjustifiable. Natural evil provides a platform for test and challenges hence natural evil provide a basis for a fair test to all. The natural evils take place naturally, hence anyone is prone to through it irrespective of whether you make good or evil decisions as per the prior argument. We would not quite be living simply because of the natural evil, though as human beings who are meant to go through temptations, we live to overcome the evils. God exists as omnipresent and omnipotent; therefore, He understands natural evil and should eliminate it for us so that we live without suffering (Hick, 72, 78, 83).…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But, according to Mackie, God lacks the power to eliminate second order evil and thus is a limit to his power. He also argues that men created by God chooses bad even though God could have made us to choose good all the time, which could have eliminated evil from the world. Thus, Mackie argues that God’s failure to do so suggests that God is no omnipotent and…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God does not want to be the puppeteer with humans as his puppets, thus giving humans free will. This is the reason for evil according to Augustine. “So too free will, without which no one can live rightly, must be a God-given good, and you must admit rather that those who use this good wrongly are to be condemned than that He who gave it ought not to have given it” . He argues that free will creates evil not a weak God. Natural disasters, death of a loved one, business failure, so many things are evil, and Augustine explains that the only reason any of that happens is free will .…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with Mackie when he says “evil is inconsistent with the existence of an all-caring all-knowing and all-powerful God. God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent while evil exists. Those three premises don’t correlate with each other. If God is omnipotent and omnibenevolent then evil cannot exist. And If evil exist God can’t be both omnipotent and omnibenevolent.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Evil Vs Free Will Essay

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My perspective on the existence of God and the problem of Evil breaks down to free will, therefore I believe that although God is all-knowing and all-loving, allowing humanity to process free will created a gate for Evil to rise in the form of decision making. God allowed humanity to exercise free will. This may, in a certain perspective portray God as an evil entity, but he does not command humanity to commit crimes, rape, murder, lie, cheat, or steal. A person’s own free will is the decision maker hence forth developing the necessary Evil which becomes the biggest issue in our society. Here are some reasons why free will is the Evil problem in the existence of God.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “Part of the definition of libertarian free will that an action that is free in that sense cannot be caused by anything outside of the agent, not even God can cause a person to freely do what is right” (Tooley). If humans are thought to have free will, then God would have no ability to control their actions. This could result in evil being brought into the world due to negative actions being executed. This objection claims that premise 2 of the Problem of Evil argument could be false since it claims that God would have the ability to eliminate all evil which would not necessarily be true because God can only do what is logically possible. To eliminate all evil in the world God would have to take away free will from God’s creations and guide them in a positive direction.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although McCloskey does not define what is evil, he gives all kind of notion to explain what is evil. The theist explanation dies not prove why there is evil in the universe but rather offer possible justifications to account for all evil in the creation. From the arguments, it is easy to point out that the arguments they admit the presence of perfect God, but they cannot negate the possibility of all-perfect God allowing evil into the universe. The presences of evil help to magnify the good as well provide set standards to measure good. Thus, the presence of evil in the universe is the free will of human being.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays