Therefore, he is an expert in this field and has much experience dealing with cases regarding the consequences of police brutality due to the government not implementing body cameras. In addition, the author provides a reason to believe by uniquely expressing his viewpoint and boldly stating his opinion on the effect of body cameras on police officers and citizens. O’Mara states, “People act better when they know they're being watched -- or recorded. Cops act better, and the people they encounter on the street are more cooperative.” O’Mara references a studied commissioned by the Police Foundation in 2012 that displays statistical evidence proving few force incidents with body cameras.…
With today’s technology, there is a rift between technology and personal privacy. Currently, no precise federal law prohibits surveillance cameras, but there is a fear with common-law confidentiality rights, which frequently leads to an evaluation of a person's "reasonable expectation of privacy. " Expectation of privacy is not an issue when overt cameras are used. A person’s expectation of privacy is also not void when on public campuses, such as Grand Valley. Surveillance cameras in public locations such as sidewalks or parking lots are no problem because there is not an expectation of privacy in such areas.…
. Moral Panic It is not uncommon for laws to be passed in response to moral panic. A moral panic occurs when events unfold that are seen as a threat to society.…
The medium that I choose to convey my visual argument was a website. My argument was that police officers should be required to wear body cameras because they have helped in citizens get off, they are more beneficial then harmful, and the body cameras could prevent future instances of police brutality. My audiences for this visual argument is the general public so that they can be made aware of what is going on and develop their own opinions on the topic. The purpose is to raise awareness and have the citizens thinking about what can be done to combat issues such as police brutality. I would like them to know that body cameras are one of the solutions to police brutality.…
This however could be contradictory if the officer does not tell or report the whole story. Without clear limits, body worn cameras may become just another tool for law enforcement rather than a mechanism for police accountability. Several studies on police body cameras have encouraging…
To prevent cases like these people have brought up the idea of police officers wearing body cameras while on duty to record every incident they encounter while on duty. These body cameras can help by preventing violence, and help with accountability, but also bring up the issue about privacy. First, the use of body cameras can help prevent violence between the police officer and the victim. When a victim gets stopped by the police officers they are…
Many cases arise where police or the civilian can not recall certain events or specific details that occurred in the situation and the police body cameras will solve that and provide a valuable extra piece of information for misconduct situations. The investment may prove to be costly, but can end up saving law enforcement time and money because body cameras can prevent court trials based on misinformation. The body cameras can help strengthen and enhance transparency and accountability in the police department. Police can also feel further protected from the possibility of false complaints. (Ferrarin, par.…
Throughout the past 10 years there has been many talks on whether the police should be required to wear body cameras. Throughout all the research and studies regarding these cameras, these have been many pros to body cams but there have also been cons and many challenges to implementing this system in police forces throughout the country. Many different police stations have done experiments with these cameras and have all shown very positive feedback. Regardless of the amount of work necessary to implement these cameras, it should be necessary for officers to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives. To go along with that, police should be forced to wear these body cameras because they have the potential to save lives, give better representation than hearing a testimony, and make suspects less likely to run or attack an officer because everything they do is caught on camera.…
What happens if a police come across a case dealing with domestic violence or a rape victim? Will that have to be on video? Also how will they handle situations like this? To start off police should definitely wear the cameras at all time while on duty no matter the situation. But when it is time to present the evidence, it should be giving in right away.…
With all the police brutality claims now there is so much controversy over police officers wearing body cameras. Some people feel that the officers should wear the cameras so that there will be a video of everything happening and there will be proof of what is going on between the officers and the civilians. Other people do not want the cameras because it violates people’s privacy. This has been an ongoing debate for a while now. In this essay I want to show some of the benefits for the body cameras.…
With police brutality increasing finding a solution is vital. Therefore police departments are trying to find solutions and body cameras is one of them. Even though privacy will be ruined, body cameras worn on police officers are one of the solutions to police brutality. Body cameras which are worn by police officers capture all activity around them within a radius of course. Therefore privacy is an issue that people might see as a problem with body…
For instance, four Cleveland police officers’ jobs were saved by body camera footage. Video footage submitted to the grand jury as evidence to support their statements, justified their use of lethal force (Gass). Therefore, body cameras and the video footage they obtain are a major asset in protecting police officers. Body cameras record every interaction civilians have with a police officer, thus there is only one truth.…
Many court cases have ended up in a flip lately because these body cameras are capturing the real live story. Did the police officer make the right decision or are they caught in the middle of a crime where they are the real criminal? In the article “Police Body Cameras: Should law enforcement agents wear body cameras?” it explores the pros and cons of body cameras, as well as real life stories that have occurred in the public. This article carries valid evidence that police body cameras have both positive and negative…
(Morales). This is an exact example of why body cameras are needed. No one deserves to be berated by a police officer, if there are body cameras, the police will most likely receive a punishment . Moreover, victims of dirty police will now get justice for their unjust treatment. ” Video had played a particularly large role in complaints of improper or excessive use of force.…
ENGLCOM – Argumentative Essay Cheyenne Xyla T. Tanggawohn March 29, 2016 Final Draft The Perquisite of Law Enforcement Cameras in the Philippine Context Law enforcement cameras are also known as body worn videos. According to Sainvilus (2016), law enforcement cameras, or body worn videos, are worn by police officers and it has the ability to document both audio and video footages of the police officer’s activities. Law enforcement cameras are made possible because of the technological advances that has occurred. Durham (2016) stated that law enforcement cameras were implemented in different states in the U.S. because it is believed that law enforcement cameras are the solution to the rising problem of police violence.…