Jackson's Knowledge Argument Based On Physicalism

Question 1 and 2.
Jackson’s knowledge argument is based on physicalism. In this document, he argues about even if you know about the conscious experience that brings about you but you would still be missing that information. This means that whatever that happens in the brain deep to the neuron, when sees red color it can produce the red experience of that color. But physicalist theory of mind would not be able to explain all the facts that account for it. Here in this article knowledge argument refuses to physicalism, which is the world is entirely physical. But there comes a doubt that aspect of mind is physical and knowledge argument articulates one of the main forms this doubt has taken. Here in this article, Jackson has two arguments where he asks us to perform a couple of thought experiments. One argument is about the fictional Fred, who can see colors that we cannot. The second argument is about scientist Mary, who knows everything there is to know about color vision but has
…show more content…
So I will be using zombie example and construct a thought experiment to make the same argument. According to Chalmers zombie are convincible, so let us think that I have my zombie twin. I am sitting on my couch, drinking coffee and thinking for arranging candlelight dinner. At the same time, I am also thinking that what kind of dress I will wear that is comfortable for me and also think about the delicious food which makes me crave for the food. What will my zombie twin be doing? She will also be thinking same what I might be thinking and would also feel the same way what I felt when thought about food. But my zombie twin will lack consciousness and yet be thinking same she will not be able to experience what I will experience and feel. Therefore, consciousness is

Related Documents