Jackson Removal Thesis

Improved Essays
Jackson defended his stand by asserting that removal was the only course of action that could save the Native Americans from extinction. Jackson's attitude toward Native Americans was patronizing, describing them as children in need of guidance and believed the removal policy was beneficial to them. To congressional leaders, he assured them that his policies would enable the federal government to place the Indians in a region where they would be free of white encroachment and jurisdictional disputes between the states and the federal government. He asked congressional approval of his removal policy. Some of the people that were sitting in the government didn’t like the idea of Jackson and didn’t want to move the tribes from their lands, by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jon Meacham, a three-time New York best seller, a native of Nashville, and a recipient of the Pulitzer Prize for American Lion, Meacham is an accomplished writer. He received a degree in English literature and had been editor for numerous organizations. While his notorieties should be praised, his background must be noted that he did not earn a degree in History. His writing was vivid and engaging; it was easy to get engrossed by his book. While the literature was impeccable, it should still be noted the historiography is slightly lacking.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Man on the Twenty Dollar Bill The past and its people are often romanticized. One such character of early American history that was romanticized was Andrew Jackson. Yet author James C. Curtis does not romanticize Jackson’s actual achievements, and also tells of his faults and flaws in his book Andrew Jackson and the Search for Vindication.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the text, ”An angry Jackson disagreed. Groups that refused to move west voluntarily were met with military force, usually with tragic results.” (source #3). Because of the ruling of Jackson many Native Americans were killed, many lost their families. He didn’t care about…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this subject was quite controversial because people agreed that he was looking out for the safety of the people, but some say that he never once considered the well being of the Indian People. In a letter to congress Jackson writes, “Humanity and national honor demand that every efforts should be made to avert so great a calamity.” Before Jackson wrote this he wrote about how the Indians were forced to move around a lot and about how some of the tribes were being over run anyway, so in this statement I think Jackson was trying the convey that to stop any disaster, or calamity, from happening, every effort should be made to remove the indians. In another document the Natives talk about the negatives of the Trail of Tears and one statement they make is, “But if we are compelled to leave our country, we see nothing but ruin before us.” That being said this is significant because it shows that the indians did this unwillingly and that when the decision was made about their removal no one including Jackson thought or seemed to cared about what truly lied ahead for them.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He shall go his face no show Should Andrew Jackson be removed off of the 20 dollar bill? I believe Andrew Jackson should be removed off of the 20 dollar because he was cruel towards the American Indians and He only supported the white males. He also supported the Indian removal act and He acted like a king. Although he did some positive things such as creating the spoils system, and contributing to the democracy by allowing more people to vote. Andrew Jackson doesn’t deserve to represent us as americans.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a large and populous country with over 300 million people spread out among the states, but it wasn’t always that way. In the 1830s the U.S government was struggling to expand its nation into the frontier. As a result, many people including Andrew Jackson and even Indians like Elias Boudinot found it necessary to move and push the Native Americans west. Jackson strongly believed that the Native Americans should move further west because it will save them from annihilation and will allow white settlers to use and find new land expanding America’s growth (Doc A). This shows how Jackson supported the native American removal because it benefited both people, the Native Americans and white settlers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson listened to them and created the Indian Removal Act. He presented it to congress and they debated it. Eventually they approved of it and Jackson enforced it. Jackson thought this would be the best way to preserve their cultures and keep peace among the Americans and the Indians. In 1832 he was reelected.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jackson Democrats committed themselves to western expansion, which in turn forced more than 120,000 Native Americans that have lived within their respective territories for hundreds of years to move west through the passing of the Indians removal act (textbook). Jackson forced thousands of Native Americans to embark on the Trail of Tears to their new territories, a journey that killed thousands of them. These actions come in direct contrast to the 1831 Supreme Court ruling that allowed for Cherokee Indians to have self rule and for the United States government not to interfere with it (textbook). No person should be able to force the mass movement of a community, especially of one that they do not have specific jurisdiction and rule over, displaying his satisfaction in creating societal turmoil without considering the people that his actions are…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unlike any other presidents the United States had seen before, Jackson was not a politician and he was not well educated unlike his predecessors and running opponents. Although controversial, Jackon’ s Indian Removal Act of 1830, relocated thousands of Indians from their lands that they had lived on for hundreds of generations. This did however, allow the US to gain a substantial amount of land. As a military leader, Jackson successfully led his Tennessee troops against the Red Sticks People in the Creek War. He also ended the creek war with the victory at the Battle of Horseshoe Bend.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Jackson went against Supreme Court decision with the Indian Removal Act and the South Carolina Resolutions, showing opposing actions to what many believed. Jacksonians went against the Supreme Court decisions in the Worchester vs. Georgia ruling. He enforced the Indian Removal Act in which Indians were forced to move westward for the benefit of the white man. (G) The…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Jackson supported The Indian Removal Act. The Act forced the Indians to move west of the Mississippi. The Indians believed they should not be removed from their home land, and the Cherokee sued the government. The Cherokee have won in court, and earned the right to stay at their homeland. This isn’t the case to Jackson; he still forced the Indians out to the west.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He commented "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government, steadily pursued for nearly thirty years, in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (Library of Congress, Jackson, 1830). At that time however only two tribes agreed to leave their land, the others were not in agreement with the Indian Removal Act. In response, the American Indians fought back on a political level, Chief John Ross who represented the majority of the American Indians who did not want to leave their lands tried to diplomatically and legally maintain autonomy with the United States…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was said that President Andrew Jackson was looking in the best interest of U.S. citizens and moved the indians to help keep from conflicts that could possibly lead to war from arising yet again between the United States and the Native Americans or that some Native tribes were just too violent and were seen as a threat by U.S. citizens. It seemed like Americans and Native Americans could not blend and live together peacefully and that is also a said reason why the Trail of Tears…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But this was ignored and whites continued to move into Indian Territory. It is reported that U.S president Andrew Jackson responded by saying “Well John Marshall his decision. Now let him enforce it!” Andrew Jackson did nothing to help the Indians or make things better for them. He believed the best thing for them was to move them…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays