Anthony Kennedy's Argument Against Homosexuals

Improved Essays
On October 6, 1998 two men took Matthew Shepard, a gay college student, about a mile outside of Laramie, Wyoming, after being lured away from a bar. These men took him out to a split-rail fence, bust his skull open with a .375 Magnum, then left him for dead. He was found later the next day by two bikers, only eighteen hours after the being brutally assaulted just because of his sexuality. When the bikers first saw Matthew tied to the fence, they thought that he was a scarecrow, but sooner realized that it was a person. Senator Craig Thomas called the attack "the most violent, barbaric thing I've ever heard happening in Wyoming.” Matthew remained in a coma until October 12, then died later that day at 12:53 a.m. Though the citizens of Wyoming …show more content…
The purpose of the amendment was to deny homosexuals special rights, throughout any of Colorado's state branches or departments or any of its agencies. When this amendment was passed civil liberties groups and gay rights groups across the nation started boycott of Colorado. Due to these actions, the state lost around 40 million dollars in convention and tourist business. In 1994 the Colorado Supreme Court declared that the state's anti-gay rights measure was unconstitutional. Justice Anthony Kennedy stated, "We must conclude that the second amendment classifies homosexuals,not to further a proper legislative end but to make them unequal to everyone else. This Colorado cannot do. A State cannot so deem a class of persons a stranger to its laws". Discrimination in our country is unconstitutional under the First, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The Fifth, Fourteenth, and Ninth Amendments all state something about the right to privacy, and prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender, religion, and disability. The First Amendment states freedom of speech and association. People argue that homosexuals behavior is what should stop them from being protected. A major argument is that gays spread aids, which is sooner or later can cause death. It's not just homosexuals that carry this STD. Aids can be carried by any man, woman, or child, no matter race or …show more content…
People should be judged on how well they work, not by their sexuality. Employers fear homosexuals will drive people away or they will molest people. Statistics show that the majority of molesters are heterosexual men that are usually related to the victim. However straight men are still allowed jobs. Other rights that are ignored is that a homosexual can't see a sick or dying partner in the hospital. Also, they can't claim partner's property after death, they can’t get custody rights, and in two states they can't adopt children. Exactly what is the purpose of denying homosexuals these simple rights? Denying these rights isn't going to make homosexuals to change their sexual preference. It is funny how history is repeating itself. Years ago African-American existence was denied, their history ignored, bashing existed and discrimination took a big part of their life. It is happening all over again, but with a different crowd. Treating people fair seems to be a common goal of our constitution. Instead, America is relying on social beliefs, not laws, to ensure that people are treated fairly. Now no one can see eye to eye between the heterosexuals and homosexuals and why it is so difficult and may never happen. However that is not the main concern. Being treated fairly and not worrying about discrimination is the group's main concern. Most people will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Romer Vs Evans Case Study

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Romer v. Evans is a case brought to the Supreme Court by Richard G. Evans (Respondent), a gay employee of the mayor of Denver against then Governor Roy Romers, The Attorney General of Colorado, and the State of Colorado (Petitioner). The case was centered around an amendment to the state constitution that prohibited “the state of Colorado… at any level of state or local government from adopting or enforcing any law or policy which provides that homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation, conduct, or relationships constitutes or entitles a person to claim any minority or protected status, quota preferences, or discrimination”. The amendment was drafted in response to changes in the municipal codes of Denver, Aspen, and Boulder which passed…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most Americans remember the tragic murder of Matt Shepard in 1998; however, many would not be able to tell you about Matt Shepard as a person, only from beliefs ripped from the headlines. This documentary discusses Matt Shepard’s life, making him a person and not just a figure in the headlines. The documentary starts off with home videos of Shepard when he was a boy, they show a geeky, young, outgoing child who had a love for theatre and performing. During Shepard's adolescence his father acquired a job in Saudi Arabia causing the family to move to Saudi Arabia, and thus Matt was sent to boarding school in Switzerland. As the documentary moves on and discusses Shepard's teenage years one discovers his murder was not the only misfortune in his life, on an abroad school trip to Morocco Shepard was attacked by a gang of 6 men and raped.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So I am really glad that chapter 9 branched out of the states of New York and California. I think it is really interesting that CFV had so much sway for a group of people that were basing their hatred on stereotypes and hearsay. When the Amendment 2 unexpectedly pass, a team of lawyers were ready to fight. Amendment 2 left the gay community in an awkward state. They were already abandoned by the federal government in the ruling of Bowers that said that sodomy laws could be kept intact and overturning Amendment didn't seem that promising.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v Hodges Winning side: The petitioners was two gay men whose same-sex partner had died along with other court cases that brought their cases to their respective District Courts that were challenging the denial of their right to marry or to have the right to have their marriages performed out of the state they reside in (Obergefell et al. v. Hodges). Each petitioner sought certiorari, which is the review of the decision the Court of Appeals have made. The petitioners argued that the actions of the relevant respondent was in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment by denying the legal recognition of their marriage that was legally performed in a state outside of the one they resided in, or either denying them the right to marry (Obergefell et al.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since intenational law trumps domestic ideas the courts would obviously decline a motion to dismiss under statutes of constitutional right. This is shown through the Kiobel case where liability lands in the scope of international law. I see the reason for Lively’s motion to dismiss, because of the American ideas of freedom of speech and religion. As a united State citizen, Lively has a basic right under first amendment due to engaging in not violent political speech anywhere in the world. The court describes that “The freedoms of speech, press, religion, and assembly, and the right not to be subject to an establishment of religion, are protected against infringement in the exercise of foreign relations power as in domestic affairs”().…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a world of injustice and hatred, one would believe that people would at least have the audacity to respect others playing the cruel game of life. Homosexuals have faced many hardships and discriminatory laws that have suggested that they differ from heterosexuals and do not deserve equality. The unjust treatment towards homosexuals lacks mutual respect to marriage laws, adoption policies, and job opportunities. Homosexual couples may not fit the generic standards of what is considered normal in society but are humans, a part of our own species, and just as equally worthy of all rights that heterosexual couples have. On the other hand, there is a number of people who believe that homosexuality is a sin and against their religion, and others…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Politics of Negotiating Public Tragedy: Media Framing of the Matthew Shepard Murder,” authors Brian L. Ott and Eric Aoki analyze the Matthew Shepard case, discussing how the media was able to alleviate the blame from the public surrounding the case and clear the public of any guilt. Additionally, the pair address the stigmatization of the LGBTQ+ community, and how this stigmatization delays efforts to prevent similar situations. Within the article, the authors provide insight that is surprising, puzzling, useful, new, and interesting. Within the article, Ott and Aoki discuss how the narrative of the story was shifted to relieve the public of any guilt or blame and isolate the pair responsible for the murder of Matthew Shepard, Aaron…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a country where freedom is not guaranteed. In this dystopia, there is no protection from the “right” of everyone else to discriminate against anyone they disagree with. Therefore, people hide their true identity so they do not feel the wrath of their neighbors. But this is not just affecting their personal lives, it is harming their finances.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A big thing is that the couple gets their marital benefits. When a couple gets married they get many great benefits that a single person wouldn’t get, so a homosexual would say this was fair to them. Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. (1) People want to believe that they can love the people that they want to love, not the people that they legally have too.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vampire Diaries depicted young teenagers having premarital sex. True Blood was the first HBO program that I was exposed to. At first the explicit content was a shock, but after a while I got used to it. Media has had a huge effect on the way that I view sexuality. While I do not think it has completely shaped my views, I am aware that it has made me more comfortable and open to the idea of sex.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But, on the other hand, telling a couple they can’t marry because of it, and making it illegal for gays to marry, is striping homosexuals of their natural rights. We as the United States can’t be known as the country who treats everyone equal, because we don’t. Especially against homosexual males and females. To sum it all up, denying them their natural rights is wrong, and society shouldn’t be dictating who can marry who. They will marry whoever they want, it’s not hurting anyone in particular, so why is it illegal?…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hatred towards homosexuals has transpired throughout multiple groups of society. Whether it be religious groups, regular people, or high school bullies, they have constantly been frowned upon. A significant amount of people believe that being gay is a choice, but those who are gay, bisexual, or transgender know that if they did have a choice, they would choose a life without being hated for who they truly are. Issues and problems as simple as hating someone because of their sexual orientation could be dealt with in a civil way, but people choose to deny them of their inalienable rights for the sake of themselves. “Being gay is a sin.”…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination. Works Cited Bull, Chris. Scene of the Crime.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are laws that a for the LGBT community and there are laws against the LGBT community. When one law is made there is always a new one to repel the old ones. Some laws such as the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 lets the government treat same sex couples like they are not even married. Other laws make same sex couples pay heavy taxes and same sex couples are not allowed to have marriage benefits like opposite sex couples. An example of these taxes is about “Windsor [who] got bitter news later in the form of federal and New York estate tax bills totaling $600,000 that would not have been levied on an opposite-sex couple” (Jost).…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays