The Pros And Cons Of Same Sex Marriage

Better Essays
Register to read the introduction… Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination. While love is blind, justice should be blindfolded to gender. Since legal marriage is a creation of the state, same-sex marriage should fall under the same guidelines of non-discrimination that the state holds for all other circumstances (Baird …show more content…
It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination.

Works Cited

Bull, Chris. Scene of the Crime. The Advocate. October 27, 1998.

Cloud, John. For Better or Worse. Time Magazine. October 26, 1998. page 43.

Eskridge, William N., Jr. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: The Free Press, 1996.

Foley, Daniel R. The State of Gay Marriage. Family Advocate v20 n1 p39. Summer 1997

Kramer, Larry.Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008

Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997. pp. 50-52

United States. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on the Judiciary. Defense of Marriage Act : report together with dissenting views (to accompany H.R. 3396).U.S. DOCS. NO. Y

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They say gay marriage confuses the children about gender roles and the expectations of society and that only a male and female can pro-create. According to opponents of same-sex marriages, having a dad and mom is better than having two moms or two dads( “Should Same-Sex Marriage Be Legal?”). There are some main arguments that people use against legalizing gay marriage. Many people bring up the fact that homosexuals can’t produce. Another huge argument is that same-sex marriage is against the Bible and a huge sin.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gay rights would make the world a better place. while accepting other people’s differences. Nobody can put themselves in their shoes, because they can’t choose whether they choose to be straight or gay, but discriminating them and stripping them from their civil rights, is just wrong and cruel of us as the United States, whom is also known as the county for freedom and our rights. We are hypocritical for saying how we have so many rights and we are such a free country, but when society dictates who can marry who, and people are being discriminated against and beaten on, that isn’t a practice of rights. Now, expressing you feel that homosexuality is a sin, is a religious right.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Defense Of Marriage Act

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first section is to tell us that the act may be referred to as the Defense of Marriage Act. The second section is to tell us that none of the states are required to recognize and treat same-sex marriages the same to heterosexual marriages. The reason why the second section needed to be established is because of the Full Faith and Credit Clause, all states and territories of America must honor other state’s laws and decision. Lastly, the third section defines what marriage is federally, which is a legal union between a man and a woman (Defense of Marriage Act). Meaning, for homosexual couples, even if legally married, benefits of heterosexual couples such as social security, filing of joint taxes, and insurance would not be accessible to…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To understand all sides of the argument it’s essential to be aware of others beliefs. Those in favor of same sex marriage believe that “an individual’s sexual orientation- like a person’s race or gender- does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights”(ethics book). Most of the allies of gay marriage, are…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He alleged that the Boy Scouts violated the New Jersey statute prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation in places of public accommodation. In response, the Boy Scouts held that allowing homosexuals to have a membership was inconsistent with the values they were trying to instill in young boys. The court ruled in favor of the Boy Scouts, saying that the accommodations law was inapplicable because the Boy Scouts was not a place of public accommodation. They also concluded that the Boy Scouts’ stance on homosexuality was clear and held that the First Amendment freedom of expressive association prevented the government from forcing the Boy Scouts to accept Dale as a member. However, the New Jersey Superior Court’s Appellate Division held that New Jersey’s public accommodation law did apply to the Boy Scouts, and that they had violated it.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion, Jordan wanted the state to restrict same-sex marriage but allow private homosexual acts between consenting adults (April Elliot). David Boonin does not believe that Jeffrey Jordan’s argument is sound here. Boonin’s thoughts on same-sex marriages are that governments should sanction them and that people should have the right to marry whomever they want. Boonin adds that Jordan’s second claim is problematic because he does not do a good job of distinguishing the public disagreement. Jordan speaks of the public dilemma as two distinct subjects of disagreement (Rachels).…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    (2013, October). Retrieved from: http://www.censorshiplebanon.org/documents/censorshipmonitor/MARCH_CensorshipMonitor[s1].pdf Dabaghi, L., Ms, Mack, A., Mrs, & Jaalouk, D. (2008, October 21). A Case Study of the First Legal, Above-Ground LGBT Organization in the MENA Region (Rep.). Retrieved http://www.moph.gov.lb/userfiles/files/Prevention/NationalAIDSControlProgram/Helem.pdf Film Censorship. (n.d.).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Directed by Toby Macdonald . National Geographic Channel, 6 March 2005, USA: Time Warner Home Video Lazar, P. R. (2012). Considerations regarding the legal status of embryo and fetus from the perspective of the right to life. Contemporary Readings In Law & Social Justice, 4(1), 371-382. Lewis, T. T. (2015).…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believe same sex marriage is a sin and that homosexual couples should be punished. They don 't think it 's right for two people of the same gender to get married because they believe marriage was created for man and woman. They also believe same sex marriage deprives children from having both a mother and father role in their lives. According to them, same sex marriage "offends" god. Same sex marriage should be legal because it 's a civil right.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    References Ash, M., & Badgett, M. (2006 December). SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL: THE EFFECT OF UNEQUAL ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT-BASED HEALTH INSURANCE ON SAME-SEX AND UNMARRIED DIFFERENT-SEX COUPLES. Contemporary Econcomic Policy, 24(4), 582-599. Retrieved July 27, 2009 from EBSCOHOST database. Briggs, S. (1994, December).…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays