Aristotle's Argument For The Legalization Of Gay Marriage

It is known by all that historically the homosexual community has been socially discriminated by its condition. This has been found for many years in a permanent controversy since it has not been possible to determine whether the origin of homosexuality is conditioned on the genetic inheritance of people. Whether your condition is properly a decision, or a consequence of your individual experiences, whether in childhood or adolescence. While this is not clarifying, the attack on his condition could be a very wrong posture. For this reason, I decided to write a letter about the historical context about marriage between people of the same gender or sex, context current and factor in favor or against it. Same-sex marriage (also known as homosexual marriage, equal marriage or gay marriage) recognizes legally or socially a marriage formed by parties of the same biological or legally recognized sex. The first …show more content…
Today we live in a society where same-sex marriage is a serious thing and cannot be, but why can't it be? There are a wide variety of opinions about this topic, several points of view, some against others in favor. Aristotle said: "The only stable state is the one in which all citizens are equal before the law," that Aristotle's phrase has a lot to do with what they do with marriages between people of the same sex. Currently, gender differentiation is not an indispensable requirement for emotional and sexual human relationships. The debate on the legality and scope of same-sex marriage is one of the most agitated and dynamic in the world. Allowing homosexual marriage does not remove rights but grants rights to someone who did not. To deny marriage to homosexuals is to discriminate against