Romer Vs Evans Case Study

Improved Essays
Romer v. Evans is a case brought to the Supreme Court by Richard G. Evans (Respondent), a gay employee of the mayor of Denver against then Governor Roy Romers, The Attorney General of Colorado, and the State of Colorado (Petitioner). The case was centered around an amendment to the state constitution that prohibited “the state of Colorado… at any level of state or local government from adopting or enforcing any law or policy which provides that homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation, conduct, or relationships constitutes or entitles a person to claim any minority or protected status, quota preferences, or discrimination”. The amendment was drafted in response to changes in the municipal codes of Denver, Aspen, and Boulder which passed …show more content…
In Justice Kennedy’s estimation, this amendment does nothing but “withdraws from homosexuals, but no others, specific legal protection from the injuries caused by discrimination, and it forbids reinstatement of these laws and policies”. Justice Kennedy supports this claim by stating that “enumeration is the essential device used to make the duty not to discriminate concrete and to provide guidance for those who must comply”. This implicates that the various city ordinances were properly combating discrimination against those of varying sexual orientations by enumerating their protection and that the revocation of this enumeration, as purported by Amendment 2, would be counterintuitive to maintaining equal protection of the law. Additionally, Justice Kennedy lists the various protections that gays and lesbians will lose under the enforcement of Amendment 2 such as an 1990 Colorado Executive order which bans employment discrimination based on sexual orientation as well as the nullification of various legal protections against unjust discrimination in housing, real estate, and welfare services. An example that hits home is how the amendment even went as far as removing rules in state colleges which prohibit discrimination on campuses, allowing for intolerance to spread like wildfire with no legal redress for …show more content…
If that idea prevailed, then it would be impossible for Gay marriage and further civil rights victories that stemmed from Evans to ever come to fruition. In my estimation, such a decision would lead to a LGBTQ community that wouldn’t only be marginalized but demonized by legislatures across the country and would lead to government sanctioned gay conversion therapy on a good day and mass incarceration on a bad one. It’s disturbing to entertain this dissenting opinion becoming the actual opinion of the court not just for the obvious implications on the gay community, but also for the doors it would open for reversing legal victories for other minority

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As I look at each side of the story I can see good point brought up on both sides of the story. For pros, you can’t deny the Constitution, and its rights that it allows people, but on the cons side, many people feel very strongly about their religion and wouldn’t want to go against it. I previously stated in the introduction that I felt that homosexuals should have the same rights that we do. I agree with Frank McEnulty, the President of Our Castle Homes though on the fact that homosexuals should have rights, but not “gay rights”, everyone should have the same rights. McEnulty stated…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plaintiffs challenge a November 2008 voter-enacted amendment to the California Constitution ("Proposition 8" or "Prop 8"). Cal. Const. Art. I, § 7.5.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    State V. Evans Case Study

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of State v. Evans, 671 N.W.2d 720, (2003). , we see the distress of the victim that suffered from both harassment and stalking from her predator for a period that span more than three years (Brody and Acker, 2010). The harassment aspect that Hubert Evans summited the victim, Rebecca Arnold, to started out at a very slow rate with it become more intense and leading to stalking over years leading to the arrest of Mr. Evans and criminal conviction for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010). The criminal charges were heard by a judge and jury where Mr. Evans gained a criminal conviction for the charges that he faced in the trial. The criminal conviction of Mr. Evans lead to his appeal to the State of Iowa Appeals court to evaluate the case as it relates to the state statute for harassment and stalking (Brody and Acker, 2010).…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case was appealed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lesbians, gays, bisexual, transgender, and genderqueer individuals are denied services and access to facilities. Some have even been fired from their jobs because of their sexual or gender identity. That is why it is necessary to ratify a new amendment…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 2000, a case came to the floor of the Supreme Court dealing with interpretation of the First Amendment. In a country of the free, we are plagued by discrimination daily. The targets have shifted over the years. Religion and race seem to be the ever-present discriminatory subjects. Though religious groups also cause hate of those who are different in sexual orientation.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme court relied on the Substantive Due Process clause to overturn the previous courts ruling and argued that the ruling violated the S. Due Process Clause, as opposed to the Equal Protections Clause. However, Justice Sandra Day O ' Connor argued in favor of the Equal Protections Clause to overturn the state laws against sodomy. The Court recognized that the privacy rights of consenting adults cannot be violated as this violates the Constitution. You would first file a complaint with the court and deliver a copy to the defendant. The…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Texas Equality

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The struggle for equality and citizen’s equal rights has been an issue and continues to be one to this day. Texas has waged many battles in the struggle for women, African Texans, Latinos, Gays, and Lesbians to all achieve the social and political equality that they all deserve. The major developments that have occurred in order for their equality are extremely significant and hold an important role in today’s society. Luckily, even after the opposition that has happened, we all came together as one and progressed forward creating equality for everyone. Women in the Republic of Texas have struggled for years in the battle of equality, until the Women’s Suffrage Movement began, which was led by Minnie Fischer Cunningham.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They ruled that legally married same-sex couples are entitled to receive equal treatment under the federal law. The ruling required that the federal benefits for legally married opposite-couples, for example Social Security, certain tax breaks and insurance benefits. These then would be extended to legally married same-sex couples. In the Defense of Marriage Act it stated a federal definition of marriage as one man and one women also to defend marriage from being redefined or expanded. In the court’s ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy and four other justices thought the DOMA went against the fifth amendment in the constitution.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays