Analysis Of Judith J. Thomson's A Defense Of Abortion

Improved Essays
What is abortion? it is a deliberate termination of a pregnancy. Removing the fetus from the mother before it is fully form. Is this something that we should consider as permissible. According to Judith J. Thomson in “A Defense of abortion”, she believes it is permissible. Throughout her whole argument she states points that people against abortion would say then she would argue against that but first, what is her argument? Thomson agrees with abortion, she feels that a mother as the right to get rid of the fetus if she wishes to or some would say, detach herself from a burden. She believes that a Fetus is not a person which she compares to an acorn. She states that “A newly fertilized ovum, a newly implanted clump of cells, is no more a person …show more content…
She introduced a scenario where a person was kidnapped because a famous unconscious violinist was found to have a fatal kidney ailment and the person blood was found to be the only one that could help the violinist. The violinist’s circularity system is then connected to the person to extract the poison from the violinist, but the person was told that if they unplugged, the violinist would die but if that person doesn’t, then it will only last 9 months until the violinist is fully recovered. Comparing this to a pregnancy is something totally different, a pregnancy is not something forced upon any one. Its avoidable and there are many ways to stop pregnancies and if a woman doesn’t take the right precautions to do so then you cat just take a life because of their mistake. A baby/ fetus didn’t just attach itself to the mother’s body, it was the choices of the mother that put it there and it’s her consequence to bear. The person who was kidnapped had nothing to do with the violinist, none of that person’s action was the cause of the kidney ailments so that person doesn’t have to help the violinist. In favor of abortion, this analogy may imply that abortion Is permissible in one sense. Let’s say that that woman who is pregnant was raped. This woman in my perspective would have all right to get rid of that baby. She did not choose to have that burden, it was as if forced onto

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Through this act, your kidney would help extract both of your body’s blood. To make the story more interesting, the violinist is only required to be attached to you for nine months until he can fully recover and unplug himself. This analogy is on par with situations where the pregnancy occurred involuntarily, such as in the case of a rape. Therefore, Thomson asks whether you have the right to unplug yourself from the violinist or if you have a duty to stay attached. She further argues that the mother…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this argument, the limitation placed on the right to life is taking resources from others. One example would be needing an organ transplant. Needing an organ to survive does not entitle you to take it from someone else, and it does not entitle you to certain other resources, like the best hospital or the soonest transplant time. Thomson follows this argument to its logical conclusion. If a fetus has a right to life, but the right to life has limitations on what resources you can take from other people, then the fetus has no right to the body of the woman carrying it.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She gives us the example of a famous violinist that has kidney failure and is hooked up to our body for nine months in order to survive. She continues to say that we did not volunteer to hook up our body. This was an interesting point to include as it relates to unplanned pregnancies and rape cases. This article focuses on the moral aspect of abortion. One of the big questions that Thomson argued was “who is more entitled to the right to life?”…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being pregnant implies that some lifestyle changes need to occur because we have a new responsibility to the fetus even if the baby isn’t born yet. If a woman becomes pregnant, she should not wait until she decides that she doesn’t want to have an abortion and doesn’t want to put it up for adoption to begin to take care of the child. Those precautions need to begin immediately or there will be large effects on the fetus. Even if the woman decides to put the baby up for adoption, she is responsible in making sure the baby…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The newly fertilized ovum is no more a person than an acorn is an oak tree. Suppose we assume, just for the sake of argument, that the fetus is a person with the right to life from the moment of conception. It does not follow; she argues that abortion is never justified. She appeals to a series of imaginary cases, such as being kidnapped and plugged into a famous violinist, being trapped in a tiny house with a growing child, and having people seeds growing in your carpet. Reflection on these cases shows that the right to life is only the right not to be killed unjustly; it does not entail the right to use your body or to live in your house.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A mother does not have many options when it comes to giving herself an abortion so we have to look at what a third party can do. Thompson asks us to imagine being in a very tiny house with a rapidly growing child. As the child begins to grow you smoosh closer and closer against the wall until you are finally crushed to death, whereas the child will be fine. Both you and the child are innocent and the child is unintentionally causing you harm. Now, this is what makes it hard for a bystander to help because they are unable to choose between your life and the child’s life.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dr. Tamis describes ‘the relationship of a woman having an abortion and helping her’ as important ‘because you know you’re saving the life of that living patient.’ However, when reflecting on his legal abortion provision, Dr. Tamis stated: It’s not an enjoyable thing to do. It’s a negative thing. I shouldn’t say negative, it’s partially negative because there is a fetus that’s not going to survive and be a part of the world here.…

    • 2429 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson depicts various scenarios in an effort to argue for the permissibility of abortion—in some cases—despite the consequential deprivation of someone else’s equal right to life. As part of her claim that every person has a right to life, she offers a scenario in which a famous violinist’s circulatory system has been plugged into an individual and is physically required to remain plugged in for 9 months. Thomson voices her claim by implying that although the fetus has a right to life as does the violinist, neither has the right to be maintained alive as the mother and the connected individual are not morally obliged to sit passively and remain plugged in. Notably, she defends her argument by recognizing that the scenario possibly…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George believes that abortion should not be legalized. That it should be restricted. He states “A pro-life advocate sees abortion as a sin against God who infuses life at the moment of conception; a pro-choice advocate sees abortion as a decision to be made in accordance with the best scientific opinion as to when the beginning of life, as we know it, occurs.” (182) I believe that in the bible it does state that abortion is wrong, so Mr. George made a good point there.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disregarding the mother’s perspective can be compared to getting an arm amputated and declaring the action is immoral from the arms point of view. Abortion differs in each case and no situation is the same, to equate a case to another is immoral and unfair to the parties involved. Marquis writes “Since we do believe that it is wrong to kill defenseless little babies, it is important that a theory of the wrongness of killing easily account for this” although he is using emotional blackmail, it does not stray me from pointing out that embryos are not babies and due to the account of miscarriages and health issues it is not determined they will have a future. Pregnancy is a dangerous time for the mother and fetus and most miscarriages happen between 7 and 12 weeks. Killing is the worst of crimes except in the cases of self-defense.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bailey Washington Mr. Reynolds Philosophy MWF 8:30 1 December 2016 Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The unwelcomed fetus has invaded the woman’s body and is “stealing” in a sense that it is taking nutrients from your body without consent (195). With this, it should not be declared morally wrong to have an…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The child 's mother whom is having the abortion does not know if that baby will make a change in the future, the possibilities are endless. First take a look at Marquis argument of why abortion is immortal. Marquis argument is that any living thing; human or animal, has their future taken away. He starts of the essay…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays