Mary George's View Of Abortion Analysis

Superior Essays
Register to read the introduction… George believes that abortion should not be legalized. That it should be restricted. He states “A pro-life advocate sees abortion as a sin against God who infuses life at the moment of conception; a pro-choice advocate sees abortion as a decision to be made in accordance with the best scientific opinion as to when the beginning of life, as we know it, occurs.” (182) I believe that in the bible it does state that abortion is wrong, so Mr. George made a good point there. Mr. George, however, makes a careless statement, “Frequently, people who are not religious, or who are only weakly so, begin to have doubts about the moral defensibility of deliberate feticide.” (187) Too me he is saying that just because a person isn’t religious they are more frequent to get an abortion than someone who is? Mary Gordon, on the other hand, believes that abortion should be legalized or that it shouldn’t be restricted. Gordon states, “It is essential that we remember that an abortion is performed on a living woman who has a life in which a terminated pregnancy is only a small part.” (188) I think that is a great point. That abortion is a small thing in this roller coaster we call life. Gordon makes another going point “It seems to me that the question of late …show more content…
Abortion is one of those topics you don’t just bring up at the dinner table. Abortion shouldn’t be done at free will. There should be boundaries set into place when dealing with this issue. If someone is dying while carrying the child they should have the option to abort. If a person was forced to have sex, without consent, and they got pregnant, they should be allowed to abort the baby if they choose too. These cases are cases that are very reasonable and I believe in Pro-life or Pro-choice would agree

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    She suggests that a parent becomes morally obligated to the fetus when they decide to not have an abortion and do not try to prevent a pregnancy and therefore allow the baby to be born without efforts of adoption. When they take the baby home, they assume responsibility for the child and cannot withdraw support from the child. She believes that just because of biological relationships, there is no special obligation to it. They can choose to assume responsibility or they can choose to not take responsibility. Until they accept responsibility, it is morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the majority opinion, it is written, “Men and women of good conscience can disagree…about the profound moral and spiritual implications of terminating a pregnancy, even in its earliest stage. Some of us as individuals find abortion offensive to our most basic principles of morality, but that cannot control our decision. Our obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate our own moral…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Roe Vs Hyde Malapropism

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Observe that by ascribing rights to the unborn, i.e., the nonliving, the anti-abortionists obliterate the rights of the living” (Ayn Rand). I have no qualms saying that I am firmly pro-choice. The government has no right making a woman’s health-related choices – my body, my choice. Also, just because abortion is legal, does not mean everyone will undergo one. Nor is abortion a decision lightly made by most women.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren believes that the moral status of abortion can be determined based on our intuition that a fetus is not a person and is therefore not properly deserving of full moral rights. Unlike other pro-choice arguments, Warren does not attempt to justify abortion based on the claim that a woman's right to control her own body includes removing unwanted property such as a fetus. Warren rejects this justification, reasoning that we do not have the moral right to expel innocent people from our property when doing so results in their death. Warren believes that the standard anti-abortion argument is vague in its use of the term, “human being” because that same word is used in two different senses and in two different premises.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson Abortion Analysis

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For Judith Jarvis Thomson abortion is something that should be a negative right, provided that it has certain guidelines. One in which abortions are neither a right that should be given nor taken away. Thomson begins by arguing that there is no right time to mark the point in which a person should begin to be considered a person. She then gives an example of an oak tree and how it is not called an oak tree at the beginning, but goes through stages to become an oak tree. Nevertheless, Thomson does agree that a fetus becomes a person at some point before it’s born, even though there is no indication to when this occurs.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Planned Parenthood has overextended its hand to millions of desperate women. Knowing that they can easily get free birth control and abortions, women have lost the sense of gravity and morality that life should be treated with. To lessen the number of abortions carried out annually—a daunting 50 million—women must face reality, they are condoning the killing of their baby, not an "it. " People can't “abort children,”—they can either keep them alive or kill them. A person should not be disposable.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where Thomson addresses John Paul II’s missed premise about the content to the right to life, leads his argument to be an invalid conclusion. She also touches upon and disagrees that the fetus’s rights outweigh that of the mother whereas Paul II believes otherwise. Warren chooses to elaborate Thomson's objections with the argument of what constitutes as person, and personhood, with the five traits that a fetus does not satisfy. Thus, according to these counterarguments the traditional argument loses its validity; leading to my own conclusion that the argument is invalid. References: Thomson, J. (1971).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Also the woman gynecologist in the article did not perform abortions the first twelve years of her career even though her work allowed her too because she came from a traditional background where it was morally wrong but she then recognized that abortions were a need in parent’s lives. She has many different stories of women who would come in seeking abortions that were unplanned, unwanted, or wanted but lethally-flawed pregnancies. For example, “Approximately one in three women in the U.S. will terminate a pregnancy in their lifetime.” (Parker 2012, p.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the case of the violinist she neglects to address the age difference between a fetus and the violinist, fails to make the fetus equal with that which represents it in story, and does not take into account the different emotional connections that take place with a stranger versus a fetus. Thomson’s case about Henry ford did not accurately represent the choices that the mother makes in an abortion oversimplifying, and adding details that lead the reader to be less sympathetic towards one side. Although she did not cover all bases on those tow arguments the chocolate box argument was a great example to support her idea that the right to life is not just about being killed, but contrarily in the right to not be killed in an unjust…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Warren agrees with this in her conclusion of these questions, believing that “even a fully developed fetus is not personlike enough” (Warren 40) to be given the rights that the moral community has or a right to…

    • 2102 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion has been a great topic of debate for many years, both in terms of law/rights and in morality/religion. The constant debate has split people into two sides: Pro-Choice and Pro-Life. Those who are Pro-Choice believe that women have a right to decide the fate of their body, health, and life. They personally may not get an abortion, but they feel that it is still the right of the mother to choose. Abortion prevents unsafe pregnancies, protects women 's right to choose, liberates women from patriarchal control over women 's sexual and reproductive lives, and allows the mother to choose whether, when, and how often to have a child.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s societies around the world, there is currently two factions of the highly controversial topic of abortion and whether it should be allowed or outlawed. These two factions on opposite sides are pro-choice and pro-life. Pro-choice supporters in essence believes a woman has the right to an abortion if she decides to do so. On the other hand, pro-life supporters believe the fetus is its own human being and has the right to live, thus an abortion cannot be performed on the woman. Judith Jarvis Thomson, a philosophy professor supports the right to an abortion in her paper, “A defense of Abortion” (186).…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    philosophers Mary Anne Warren and Don Marquis have different views on the morality of abortion. Warren believes abortion is not immoral and Marquis argues that it is. Pro-choice activists believe that the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays