Vedder argues that with fewer subsidies for higher education, the problem might disappear; however, this is not a good solution because if public subsidies were taken away, education would be more expensive and only certain people would get it, thereby reducing the total number of graduates. A better solution to this could be that a college education should not be so expensive to the point people are in debt when graduating.
Vedder’s essay analyzed and criticized many points of Carnevale’s essay, but Vedder failed to realize that he also had flaws in his own essay. Vedder pronounced in paragraphs seven and eight, “The BLS dataset is robust enough to account for underemployment, albeit perhaps imperfectly.” Carnevale’s feedback of the BLS information is nothing, contrasted with that of Cliff Adelman of the Institute of Higher Education