An Impeachable Offense Analysis

Improved Essays
The president and other civil officers can be removed from office for treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. The problem is that there are several different interpretations of those words. There are four main interpretations of those words. The first interpretation is that it is up to congress to decide what it means. Congressmen Gerald Ford said “What, then, is an impeachable offense? The only honest answer is that an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history; conviction results from whatever offense or offenses two-thirds of the other body considers to be sufficiently serious to require removal of the accused from office…” (High Crimes and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    An unclear law of treason also becomes complicated when an…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before we get into the legal reasoning for his impeachment, we have to understand his conflicts and oppositions he had with congress and the radical republicans who deeply opposed his views on issues regarding enforcing laws in the south and ensuring former slaves get the freedom that they deserve. One way that the two sides differed was about…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1974, the House of Representatives Charges President Richard M. Nixon with the first of three articles of impeachment for obstruction of justice after he refused to release White House tape recordings that contained crucial information regarding the Watergate scandal. Under the impeachment, Nixon was in result to Article One for obstruction of justice, Article Two for abuse of power, and Article Three contempt of Congress.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 17, 1972, following Richard Nixon’s election members of his staff were caught stealing from the Democratic National Committee office located in the Watergate Hotel in Washington D.C.. This case went to court because the prosecutor wanted to prove that Nixon knew about the scandal and was covering up the incident. They hoped to gain the tapes and documents from the Oval Office. The question the United States Supreme Court was tasked with answering was if the President’s right to safeguard certain information, using his “Executive Privilege” confidentiality power, make them entirely immune from judicial review.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Foner makes it well known that President Nixon did not get along with workers and some known reporters. In the section called, “Watergate” Eric Foner states, “He viewed every critic as a threat to national security and developed an enemies list, that included reporters.” When a President has foes and considers them enemies his job will become very hard and Americans can claim him as bias. Also, by having the mind set as a critic could really make world affairs a rough situation for Nixon. When America found out that the President was trying to ruin one political side it showed Nixon was not a good leader, and he was bias.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As many people know, the impeachment process of a president is not a good thing. Out of all of our presidents of the United States, two have been impeached. Both William Clinton and Andrew Johnson were impeached from the oval office. Andrew Johnson served in the oval office from 1865 to 1869 before he was impeached. William Clinton served as president from 1992 to 2000 before he was impeached from the oval office.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clinton's presidency was a seemingly long hard road. During his second term as President, He was impeached due to charges of lying under oath to a grand jury and obstruction of justice. However, the real underlying reason for the impeachment was Clinton’s denial of the Lewinsky Affair. The public opinion of the Lewinsky Affair allowed the Republican party to create a political strategy to use against Clinton. “Contending that Clinton had committed perjury, Republican leaders made the affair the centerpiece of their quest to defeat Democrats in the 1998 congressional elections” (Jansson, 2012,p.398).…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Impeach Clinton Lies

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A majority of the public though, continued to side with the democrats, believing that although he most definitely lied about his oath, they felt as if the lies did not matter as much because the situation did not directly affect the Nation’s well being. But how can serious lies and meaningless lies exist? Shouldn’t a lie just be a lie? Those questions were the center of the Republican’s argument. Clinton had lied under oath plain and simple and that was an impeachable offense no matter what the lie was about.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Elastic Clause

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Article 2, Section 4 states, “The President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” This means that Congress can take action to terminate a political leader’s term in office. If said political leader is suspected of committing “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,” the House of Representatives has the power to bring he or she up on impeachment. Once tried, the Senate then decides to either convict or acquit the person in power. Thus the whole process is handled only by Congress.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Watergate, an office complex located near the Potomac in Washington never seemed to serve as such an important place as it did on the evening of June 17. 1972. On that evening a burglary took place that not only would shape the rest of current President Nixon’s term in office, but would also shape how the American people see their President, and how the American people sees their government. Nevertheless, the story of the robbery came to Woodward on a Saturday, quite confused by the location of the robbery because two years earlier the building had been a place where thousands on Anit-Nixon Protesters shouted slurs to the Republican party that had been in the Watergate complex (APM 14) Quickly following a few phone calls Woodward realized that…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 10 of Examining Wrongful Convictions: Stepping Back, Moving Forward our authors Take a look into our plea-bargaining systems role into wrongful convictions. According to our authors plea- bargaining dispose of roughly 95 % of adjudicated criminal cases (Maguire, Tbls. 5.24.2008, 5.46.2006). Over my years of taking criminal justice course I have learned to so many innocent people actually plead guilty to crimes they did not commit. DNA evidence which lead to an exoneration is evidence of just that. Wrongful convictions produce out of our Plea Bargaining are much less likely to result in an exoneration due to the defendants own admittance.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Act was later repealed, at the time when the act was still in place, Johnson disobeyed it. Johnson tried to veto the Tenure of Office Act, but it was passed over to the Radical Republicans in Congress. The act was placed to prevent and restrict presidents from gaining power by removing past members of the office without consent from the Senate and replacing them with people who agreed with them. However, going against this act, Johnson fired Edwin M. Stanton. This is a clear violation of the law, whether it happened once or more, a president should not be able to make excuses when it comes to breaking the law.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The sedition Act was a bit of a hypocritical act. So this act overall makes it a crime to criticize any officer of the government. So basically it was illegal to talk or make the government seem horrible or terrifying in any sort of way. I say it’s a bit hypocritical because it attacked the writer of the Jeffersonian paper and other writers locking them up in prison for writing truths about the government. Their wives continued to work the newspapers, but these men suffered.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Watergate Scandal Essay

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Richard Nixon was in one of the most controversial issues that the United States has ever seen. The Watergate Scandal is now well known throughout history today. This issue led to Nixon resigning only 2 years in his 2nd term. Did President Nixon make the right decisions? Can anyone really trust the government after a situation like this?…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 8 – Local vs. National Authority In Chapter 8 of Thirteen American Arguments, Fineman discusses the tensions between local and national authority. (a) List five issues that Fineman deals with directly in the book and briefly describe how each of those issues create tension between local and national authority. Hurricane Katrina revealed a fault in American politics. Although they had predicted the dangers, neither the federal government nor the state government was in command.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays