The Elastic Clause

Improved Essays
Show More
As a result of the Articles of Confederation completely failing the framers of the United States quickly got to work on drafting a new document. This new document would be named the Constitution. Once the new Constitution was revised and finished it was sent to all the states for ratification. This left every state with at least two questions: Does the Constitution benefit the central government or the individual states? And more importantly, which party do I want it to benefit? The new U.S. Constitution does more to satisfy those that advocate for a strong central government because of the Elastic Clause and the process of impeachment. The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, does more to satisfy those who advocated for a strong central government. Article 1, Section 8.18 states, “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for …show more content…
Article 2, Section 4 states, “The President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United States shall be removed on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” This means that Congress can take action to terminate a political leader’s term in office. If said political leader is suspected of committing “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors,” the House of Representatives has the power to bring he or she up on impeachment. Once tried, the Senate then decides to either convict or acquit the person in power. Thus the whole process is handled only by Congress. This can be classified as an act of supremacy because it shows the government thinks the members of Congress are the only people intelligent enough to decide on what is best for the country. Once again the individuals find themselves unable to input their opinions. Although the Constitution grants the federal government a lot of power, it does not fail in protecting the rights of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq
    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    When the United States had just declared their independence, it was clear that governmental structure needed to be established. In 1777, the Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, which all states would ratify by 1781. The Articles of Confederation would prove to be a weak constitution, giving too much power to the states and not having a strong enough central government. This realization led to several changes being made until a new framework was implemented. The Constitution established a better relationship between central and state governments, while making sure that no form of government would become too powerful.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    How Did Alexander Hamilton Ratify The Constitution?
    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Alexander Hamilton Ratify The Constitution?

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Uncle Tom's Cabin Dbq Essay
    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Uncle Tom's Cabin Dbq Essay

    The Constitution was created to replace the Articles of Confederation, since the Articles of Confederation granted too little power to the federal government, which caused Shay’s rebellion. Within the Constitution, there are laws that both limit and give power to the federal government and other laws that protected citizen’s natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness or property. The Constitution that was once the cause of national unity caused the Union to split into two separate sides: the abolitionist North, and the slave-holding South. The reasoning of this is mainly due to the Constitution’s ability to adapt to changes according the circumstances.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay
    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    (112)American History Questions: 1a. The Articles of Confederation were concerned with the issue of state representation, land claims for states, and the role of a federal government. During the revolution, the states were still sovereign, which created massive conflict between states with greater financial and economic power and those with lesser power. More so, the debates over the role of a greater union between the states was important perceived threat to larger states, such as New York, that did not want a federal government regulating state sovereignty. In this manner, the Articles of Confederation reigned in state territorial claims and it solidified some aspects of a “confederation” that set the stages for a federal government after the Revolutionary War (Berkin et al. 153).…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Pluralism In 1787
    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Examples Of Pluralism In 1787

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Essay
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Essay

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

    From their conception and drafting in 1776, the Articles of Confederation were nothing but a reaction to the English government. When possible, the colonists continually strived to do the exact opposite of what the English government would. This effort to avoid tyranny resulted in a decentralized, weak, inefficient, and financially poor government, one that was also nigh impossible to change and amend. Not only did this later spur reform, but it also gave impetus to “those who favored a strong central government” (persons such as Alexander Hamilton).…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Constitution
    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Constitution

    Thus, the document was intentionally weakened and setup for failure by its writers, who soon came to realize that a strong central government was necessary for national unity. The weaknesses that the Articles of Confederation introduced into the United States were largely repaired by the Constitution, and one can see the difference in the documents’ longevity through their life-spans: The Articles of Confederation lasted 7 years and the Constitution has continued to thrive for over 227 years! The stability and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution reflect a document created out of years of trial-and-error, one that signifies the very nature of…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dual Federalism Vs New Federalism
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dual Federalism Vs New Federalism

    At the Philadelphia Convention, the federalist constitution was opposed by some representatives of the state because they felt it limited the power of the states. They believed that it gave too much power to the central government. Some arguments that were made for in favor of the federalist constitution was that a central government would better protect the rights of the American people. The Supremacy clause stated “that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government’s claims” (Morone & Kersh 118) was self evident in proving the fact that the central government, although permitting states reserved powers, would have more power than the states. The changes from Dual Federalism to New Federalism…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq
    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    As the Revolution came near the end, Americans decided there needed to be a set of laws in place, for the independence that will be gained if they win the war. The first set of rules to be drafted is known as the Articles of Confederation. Seeing that it was America’s first attempt at a government, it is quite obvious that there were many issues with the rules and provisions created, which caused problems in the new nation and stress among political leaders. The Articles of Confederation caused economic, legislative and leadership problems, along with unrest in the Anti-Federalist Party as shown in Documents A, spoken by Melancton Smith and Document B written by Brutus 1.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did The President Have Limited Power
    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did The President Have Limited Power

    According to Federalist #51, “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates,” meaning congress is the most powerful branch of the government, but the founding fathers believed the president should serve as an additional check on power. A perfect example of why they wanted the check on congress’s power is what Madison stated in federalist #51, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” This means that if congress becomes too powerful then the president can check congressional power and vice versa. The president can convene congress and has veto power. The president can call Congress into a special session, as described by the constitution, on “extraordinary occasions.”…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists The feud between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party was based on the ratification of the Constitution. Even though both groups believed that the principal purpose of government is to secure individual rights and that the best instrument for that purpose is some form of limited republican government. They also agreed that the individual has the right to do anything that the government has no power to keep him from doing.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Arguments
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti Federalists Arguments

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ratifying The Constitution Persuasive Essay
    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ratifying The Constitution Persuasive Essay

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Revolutionary War
    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Revolutionary War

    King George III and the British accumulated a massive debt after the French and Indian war. British assets were depleting at an exponential rate, so Parliament decided to tax the colonists in order to offset their expenses from the war. By reducing the debt from the seven-year war King George’s could reign over the colonies for many years to come. Consequently, Colonists in the 13 states suffered higher expenditures, even imported tea would cost more than usual. All 13 colonies gave consent on paying higher taxes to the British crown, however Boston didn’t consent because they weren’t provided representation so their response was no, but parliament subjected them anyways.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings