Acquittal Case Study

Decent Essays
For the second time in less than two months, a US judge declared a mistrial in the case against an Alabama police officer charged with slamming an Indian grandfather to the ground last February and severely injuring him.

US District Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala declared a mistrial Wednesday in the case against Madison Police Officer Eric Parker, 27, for assaulting Sureshbhai Patel after the jury told her that it was deadlocked despite 'intense discussions', according to Al.com.

Parker's first criminal trial at the federal courthouse in Huntsville ended Sep 11 with a jury hung 10-2 in favour of acquittal, leading to the retrial.

The retrial began Oct 26. The new jury spent more than three days deliberating after receiving the case on Friday
…show more content…
"They put their hands on me and I was just standing and did not move."

Federal prosecutors argued Patel, 57, is a "small, old man" who does not speak English, had just arrived from India a week earlier and did not pose any threat to the pair of officers who confronted him.

Defence attorney Robert Tuten told the jury that lack of English does not excuse Patel: "When you come to the US we expect you to follow our laws and speak our language."

He also argued that Patel's actions led to the takedown, that Patel was not allowed to walk away from police or pull his hand away.

Assistant US Attorney Robert Posey, according to Al.com said Tuten had moved the judge for acquittal after the mistrial. The judge must rule on that before the prosecution can decide whether to bring the case back for a third trial.

Posey said: "I feel strongly about the case. It's something we're going to discuss...this is a strong case that needed to be brought. And it would be nice to get a resolution."

Parker also faces a state charge of misdemeanour assault. That case has been on hold pending the outcome of the federal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathson Fields Case Study

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nathson Fields was in a street gang in Chicago known as El Rukn. He was convicted of two murders at the age of 29 in 1986. Fields was arrested and charged for first degree murder. After he got convicted he requested a jury sentencing hearing. The jury concluded that Nathson Fields was eligible for the death penalty.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. ¬¬___ (2012). Parties: United States, Plaintiff / Appellant Antoine Jones, Defendant / Appellee Facts: Antoine Jones was a nightclub owner in the District of Columbia that was arrested in 2005 for drug possession after the police attached a GPS tracker to his vehicle. The tracker was attached to the vehicle because Jones was under suspicion of narcotics trafficking. The GPS tracker was authorized for use on the vehicle belonging to Jones’ wife although Jones was the primary driver. However, the police failed to comply with the warrant’s deadline and installed the GPS tracker on the vehicle anyway.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Calder Case Summary

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Calder V. British Columbia Attorney General [1973] SCR 313 Calder case is a pacesetter for aboriginal jurisprudence in Canadian supreme court. It is the first to recognize that aboriginal title to land exist as a sui generis type of right in Canada at the time of time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763 and does not devolve from the colonial, Crown law, treaty or statute. The main issue for determination in this case was whether Crown authority lawfully extinguished the aboriginal title to the ancestral land occupied by the Nisga’a tribe that pre-existed at the time of the Royal Proclamation Order of 1763. The case was ended as a deadlock, the court split three to three in favor and against the appeal, while the seventh judge dismissed…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the Respondent Gerald Scarpelli was a convicted criminal who originally pleaded guilty to armed robbery in Wisconsin. The presiding judge, in this case, sentenced him to 15 years incarceration for the robbery offense but suspended the imprisonment and placed him on probation, which is a community transition program, for 7 years (Gagnon v. Scarpelli 411 US 778 - Supreme Court 1973). I think the judge had the expectation of Scarpelli fulfilling the terms of his probation and the other stipulations that were required during his time since it was certainly less than the originally stated 15 years. Scarpelli was given permission to live in Illinois under the Adult Probation Department of Cook County but was later…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roth V. Balhumane Case

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ryan Roth and Markell Thomas posted an ad on Craigslist for a Samsung cellphone and lured Rene Balbuena and his son to a location under the guise of making a fair deal for the cellphone. Ryan and Markell had intended to rob the person that showed up and had done so several times before. Markell made a deal in exchange for his testimony while Ryan pleaded not guilty to charges of murder, attempted murder and four counts of robbery. During the trial Ryan used the alibi defense, stating he was at work during the robbery and murder of Rene Balbuena and thus could not have possibly murdered Mr. Balbuena.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A lawyer named James Donovan, whose specialty is in insurance settlements agrees to take on the case of a KGB spy, Rudolph Abel, after federal agents find incriminating documents in his room. No one thinks, not even Donovan's own wife or an, that Donovan will try very hard to get the spy acquitted; even though Donovan takes his work seriously. When he tries to give Abel a fair trial, it's met with hate mail and a attempt on Donovan's life. He still pushes on to give Abel a fair defense.…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He never got to make a verdict; he was fired a week later from his manger position in Hawley. His owner there learned about his job decision. This left him with one choice, he was now the owner of Park Rapids…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Double Jeopardy, in the Fifth Amendment, claims that one cannot be tried twice for the same crime. Once a trial has ended the government cannot choose to include new evidence and put a person on trial again. The right of Double Jeopardy is extremely important because it hinders the government from having the power to continuously try a person for the same crime. To be put on trial multiple times can get expensive, therefore it would make the most sense to only put a person on trial once. Although people should be tried if they have sincerely done something wrong, Double Jeopardy protects the defendants from having to constantly fear that they will be imprisoned.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jodi Arias Case Analysis

    • 1546 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I decided to do option #2 major case observation and analysis. The online case I decided to do my research on was the Jodi Arias case. I believe the reason I picked this case over the others was this case was very interesting to me. Sure the O.J. Simpson case was a big one, but we all know he got away with murder. The George Zimmerman’s case didn’t last that long, and I felt that I would just find the same information in my research.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I headed into the courtroom of Judge Thomas Marcelain to observe my first courtroom trial. The trial involved a 31-year-old man named, Daniel Bohanna, of Pataskala. Mr. Bohanna decided to represent himself in his trial for fear of misrepresentation. He was charged with rape, kidnapping, and felonious assault. I have seen footage on T.V. from famous trials and of course seen reenactments from Hollywood, but I have never been to one in person until now.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I went to Kings County Supreme Court. Its located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn NY at September 21 at 2:30 pm to 4:40 pm under Honor Francois A. Rivera from Part 52. The case type was civil and type of the proceedings is a trial. There were 8 jurors in the stand. Mostly male and about 2 females juror.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sacco And Vanzetti Essay

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “It took them only a short time to reach their verdict. “Guilty of murder in the first degree,” said the foreman of the jury” (David 15). The jury disregarded all of the reasonable doubt shown, and declared them guilty without even much deliberation. Despite this verdict, the defense had expected this and were ready to appeal the verdict. New evidence arose after the trial, and this evidence should have cleared the two of all guilt.…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays