14 Year Old Children To Die In Jail Analysis

Decent Essays
No, probably not if they are nonviolent. A 13 or 14 year doesn’t have the maturity to make all the decision an adult makes well. They still have some morals, and probably should have known better than to do a crime worthy of lifelong imprisonment. However, at a young age, it doesn’t seem like many minors have a true understanding of what that sort of heavy punishment means. Even I don’t understand what it would feel like be in jail, much less for a time longer than I’ve already been alive.
However, according a different article on the EJI website, “Cruel and Unusual: Sentencing 13- and 14-Year-Old Children to Die in Prison,” in many of the cases where children are tried as adults, the judges do not chose to try children as adults. It was a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile crime is overwhelming throughout the country and most states have enacted laws allowing convicted juveniles to be tried as an adult and sentenced to death for serious crimes. This case addresses the issue of whether sentencing a youth to death for a crime he or she committed during the age of sixteen and seventeen is cruel and unusual punishment in violation On evening of January 7, 1981, in Jefferson County, Kentucky, Kevin Stanford, age 17 years and 4 months committed the murder of Barbel Poore. Stanford along with his accomplice constantly raped and sodomized Poore during and after their commission of a robbery at Checkers gasoline station located on Can Run Road. Afterwards Poore was driven to a secluded area where…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the evening of July 15, 2003, Cole Cannon went to the home of Evan Miller to make a drug deal with Millers mother (Miller v. Alabama, 2012). Evan Miller and his co-defendant Colby Smith followed Cannon back to his own trailer where all three of them smoked marijuana and played drinking games. After a while Cannon passed out and Miller stole Cannon’s wallet. Miller and Smith split $300.00 between them (Miller v. Alabama, 2012).…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the documentary 15 to Life, Kenneth Young was 14 years old when the first crime happened, he attempted robbery and attempted robbery another 3 times. Kenneth was charged with 4 consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole for all robberies at age 14/15, while Jacque Bethea a 24-year-old man was tried and sentence to 1 concurrent life sentence; which is a lesser sentence than the juvenile. Kenneth was able to get a resentencing under Graham v Florida, which states that children are different from adults. Even though the offenders do everything possible to rehabilitated while in prison the court/judge doesn’t believe that is enough to resentence Kenneth.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled, “Capital punishment must be limited to offenders who commit a narrow category of the most serious crimes and extreme culpability makes them deserving of execution.” www.casebriefs.com This is due to the fact that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. They are also more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures. The courts also noted that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as an adult.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children are usually seen as innocent, as they play around with others and are just balls of energy. Often seen as simply kids who have no experience in the outside world until they grow older. However, sometimes a child’s play can go wrong and can affect another’s life. When these incidents happen where a death is involved, it’s often easy for society to look at the offender as a murder who should be in prison for the rest of their life despite what age the offender may be. While juveniles committing heinous crimes should be punished, they should also be given the chance to rejoin society at an appropriate age; therefore juveniles who redeem themselves should be able to get released earlier and be able to put their life together.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Sentence

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since adolescents are the easiest to persuade into doing bad things, they are punished harsher than adults. It’s a sort of scare tactic but it’s victimizing all children who have been convicted for a crime. The court system are assigning or giving children harsher penalties due to their age. Adults may receive only one life sentence without parole, where on the other hand a minor may receive up to four life sentences. In the documentary (Children in Prison for Life Sentence)…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is claimed by the Supreme Court in Pequenza’s documentary 15 to Life that, “kids are different” (Pequenza). Juveniles are different then adults their brain is not as mature as a adults brain is hence why the opposition's argument/ ideal is disagreeable. Juveniles should receive mandatory life sentences because it is wrong and cruel for someone so young to receive a punishment so drastic. If a juvenile stole from a store for a candy bar because their family had no money for food. Does that child deserve to spend life in prison?…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Children ranging from the ages of thirteen and up have been tried in court as adults and are faced with harsh sentences to die in prison without the slightest consideration of their circumstances and age for the offense penalized against them. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, determined that “requiring that all children convicted of homicide receive lifetime incarceration without possibility of parole, regardless of their age and age-related characteristics and the nature of their crimes” is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Cost of Mass Incarceration). According to Stevenson, “The U.S. is also the only country with life sentences without parole for 13 year-olds…. kids don’t have the judgment, the maturity, the impulse control and insight necessary to make complicated lifelong decisions. They can’t make the same kind of long-term judgments.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The 8th Amendment

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Too Young or Just Right? Through history, the way society has dealt with consequences to previous unjust actions have evolved over the years, especially with children. In the 18th century kids were being sent to jail or killed for innocent crimes. Cyriaque Lamar, an expert on this time period states “During the Victorian era kinds as young as 11 received adult sentences for minor crimes”.…

    • 2053 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many children are sentenced life in prison without parole because of the…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile Incarceration

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Children as young as nine years old are being tried as an adult in trial. Is it fair to hold these children and teens to the same mentality of adults? Children and teens should not be tried as adults, instead the judicial system should focus on…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They have the same choice in making the decision to commit the crime so why would they not get the same amount of time as an adult? If they make adult decisions then they should get the adult consequences. There will always be someone bias in the jury but as they do get convicted of the crime, juveniles still get less time than adults. When the crime is murder, however, juveniles do get sentenced to life without parole depending on the extent. “Difference in responsibility measures indicated that those in the twenty five year old group were significantly more inclined to take responsibility for their own actions and view behaviors in long term” (Bryan-Hancock and Casey 66).…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays