Roper Vs. Simmons Case Study

Improved Essays
In the case of Roper versus Simmons, the question at hand is whether the execution of a human being who was17 years old when he committed a murder violated the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). These Amendments forbid the obligation of the death penalty for those who suffered from a mental disability and who were insane should be prohibited from a sentence of capital punishment (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). According to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it was lawful to execute a juvenile delinquent who was 15 years older but younger than 18 when he committed a capital crime (Elrod and Ryder, 2014). Roper versus Simmons paved the way in the judicial …show more content…
Simmons conspired with John Tessmer and Charles Benjamin to burglarize, murder, tie up and toss the body of a victim off of a bridge (Legal Information Institute, 2017). Tessmer later refused to engage in the crime. Simmons and Benjamin still carried out the conspiracy. Afterward, Simmons proudly bragged about the killing (Legal Information Institute, 2017). Simmons was apprehended and later confessed to the crime. A videotaped was recorded of the reenactment at the crime scene. Testifying against Simmons, Tessmer's testimony justified premeditation. Simmons was exonerated as an adult, convicted, and sentenced to the death penalty (Legal Information Institute, 2017). He was convicted as a minor for a crime that was classified on an adult level. After turning 18, Simmons’ sentence was upgraded to the death penalty. His attorney filed a subsequent petition and direct appeal for state and federal post-conviction relief (Legal Information Institute, 2017). These appeals were rejected. On behalf of The Missouri Supreme Court, Simmons received a stay (Legal Information Institute, …show more content…
In reference to Atkins versus Georgia, The Supreme Court eventually ruled that by executing the mental challenge did violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments pertaining to cruel and unusual punishment (Legal Information Institute, 2017). Simmons’s counsel argued that the Constitution forbids the execution of a juvenile who is under the age of 18 when a crime was committed. Simmons filed a new petition for a state post-conviction relief, arguing that Atkins’ established reasoning that the Constitution forbids the execution of a youth who was under the age of 18 when they committed a crime (FindLaw, 2017). Nine years later, the Missouri Supreme Court finally reviewed Simmons’ case in 2003 (Legal Information Institute, 2017). The Missouri Supreme Court acknowledged and reversed Simmons’ death sentence to life imprisonment without the eligibility of parole (FinbLaw, 2017). Simmon's death sentence was overturned on grounds that the opinions of the public and national learned organizations reflect a consensus that would not support such executions (FindLaw, 2017). They acknowledged that the execution of juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment against cruel and unusual punishment based on the standards of decency test. The state of Missouri appealed the ruling upholding that the death penalty for crimes committed by 16

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Simmons obtained new counsel because of ineffective assistance of counsel, but was denied the motion for post conviction relief. Issue Presented: Whether it is lawful under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution to execute a juvenile offender who was older than 15 but younger than 18 when he committed a capital…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cole Cannon Case Summary

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court would judge the case on whether sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life in prison without parole violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). Miller’s counsel argued that sentencing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole without considering certain factors such as his age violates the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments’ ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Carrizales & Schultz, n.d.). The state of Alabama argued that punishing a fourteen-year-old to life without parole does not violate the Eight or Fourteenth Amendment, but serves a justifiable penological goal when the crime is aggravated murder (Carrizales & Schultz,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile crime is overwhelming throughout the country and most states have enacted laws allowing convicted juveniles to be tried as an adult and sentenced to death for serious crimes. This case addresses the issue of whether sentencing a youth to death for a crime he or she committed during the age of sixteen and seventeen is cruel and unusual punishment in violation On evening of January 7, 1981, in Jefferson County, Kentucky, Kevin Stanford, age 17 years and 4 months committed the murder of Barbel Poore. Stanford along with his accomplice constantly raped and sodomized Poore during and after their commission of a robbery at Checkers gasoline station located on Can Run Road. Afterwards Poore was driven to a secluded area where…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was sentenced to death in 1993, when he was only 17. Christopher challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that the execution of minors violates the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment found in the 8th and 14th amendment. The Missouri state court ruled the death penalty for murder. A series of appeals followed the case to the state and federal courts that lasted until 2002, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided that the execution of the mentally ill and minors violated the 8th and 14th amendment. With the 5 to 4 vote, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Simmons and set aside Simmons’ death sentence in favor of life in prison without eligibility for release.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Stanford v. Kentucky, the Supreme Court held that the implementation of the death penalty on criminals over the age of sixteen at the time of their crime did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban against cruel and unusual punishment. The Court ruled that the definition of cruel or unusual punishment hinged on said society's description of "evolving standards of decency." In Stanford vs. Kentucky, the Court found that the standards of decency did not reveal a clear national consensus against the use of the death penalty on capital offenders for crimes committed while the offender was over the age of sixteen. Thus, the belief that individual states maintained jurisdiction over the appropriate implementation of the death penalty was held…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Essay

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kentucky as the basis for sentencing juveniles to death for murder. Prior to Roper v. Simmons Courts could issue juveniles under 18 but older than 15 death sentences for murder ("Juveniles and the Death Penalty," n.a., p. 1). Roper v. Simmons overruled Standard v. Kentucky thus making the sentencing anyone under the age of 18 when the crime was committed unconstitutional. In my opinion, in a case like Simmons, adult court is where the trial and sentencing needed to be held.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case changed my outlook far as execution of juveniles. This case involved Simmons a young man that had a murder charge. I feel at age 17 you should be aware of our actions and with the fact that he bragged about the killing was an eye-opener to think of the possibility that this individual could have had mental issues or suffered some type of abuse as a youngster, that may have caused him to carry out this act of violence. I don’t feel he should have been executed due to these possibilities; however, a tough sentence should have been enacted. This case changed the development of sentencing anyone under the age of 18 to death it was ruled cruel and usual punishment.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Has the court sentenced the minor due to the evidence presented and the extent of the case? (Aggravated Murder). Miller argues, these amendments have been violated because of his age, while the state argues, the crime was determined aggravated murder, and so sentencing is justifiable and appropriate. Throughout the trail similar cases such as Roper v. Simmons (2005), and Graham v. Florida (2010), worked in Miller’s favor by using the information in the trail. Roper v. Simmons was a cased based on, if juveniles were able to be sentenced to the death penalty due to a murder.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On 8th Amendment

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Due Process There are several Amendments within the United States Constitution twenty-seven to be exact, that have a noticeable impact on the way criminal offenders are processed through the criminal justice system in America. There are few of the rights guaranteed to criminal defendants by the U.S. Constitution that have a more tangible impact on the handling of offenders throughout the criminal justice system in the United States. These Amendments are the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and the 14th Amendments of the US Constitution (Ingram L. J., 2009). The 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and the 14th Amendments of the US Constitution guarantees criminal defendants rights against unreasonable “searches and seizures”, protects against unfair treatment in legal processes, the right to have legal counsel present, right against “cruel and unusual punishments”, and the right to rights and equal protection of the laws. Why are the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and the 14th amendments so impactful to the way criminal are processed through the criminal justice system in the United States?…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finch Sharpe Trial

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The victim was only 25 years old, cause of death was due to an acute poison in the victim’s drink. We had to prove the defendant committed the heinous act, and I was feeling pretty confident as I walked into the room and stood in front of the pleasant mahogany desks. The defendant did do it, all the evidence pointed to it. Pretty straightforward, or so it would seem from an outsider’s point of view. But I knew better, Sharpe knew better, Finch knew better.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life Sentence

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kenneth Young was 14 when he was convicted and received four life sentences. While the brains of the operation, a 24 year-old black male was only sentenced for only a single life sentence. Yes both roughly the same length but it’s apparent that the adolescents are treated unfairly in the court systems. The worst part of the injustice system is that one of the biggest, most biased factors that play a role in deciding the final discipline is…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They thus held that the death penalty did not constitute as cruel and unusual punishment for offenders 16 or older, following society’s standard of…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the article Death Penalty for Teens, Frank W. Heft JR thinks that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment for teens. While David Smith thinks that the death penalty for teens is not cruel and unusual punishment, they both have different views points about this matter and they do not agree. Heft and Smith disagree on juvenile capital punishment in three different areas, physical maturity which includes age, state law versus federal law, and emotional maturity that refers to the ability to understand, and manage their emotions and the ability to respond to the environment in the appropriate manner. Because of their disagreement on age maturity, and emotional maturity, federal law and states law, it leaves the reader undecided…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marin Sinzer Case Study

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    While the “criminal is a child” approach to the juvenile justice system is appealing due to its forgiving nature and emphasis on rehabilitation rather than punishment, there are some cases in which this decision is not so cut-and-dry. One of these instances of a legal “gray area” is the case of Marin Sinzer, who was charged for the murder of Tammy Shevin, 25 years after the crime was committed. The now 38 year old is petitioning to be tried as a juvenile, since he was only 13 at the time of the crime, a year younger than the waiver age at the time. While many proponents of the “criminal is a child” approach take that stance because of the physical and psychological dangers posed to juveniles who are placed in adult prisons, in this unique…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Justice Frontline’s video, “Second Chance Kids,” takes its viewers through a controversial topic: life in prison for those who committed crimes as teens. Before the mid 2000s, teenagers who murdered someone get sentenced to life without parole. The arguments that teenagers grow up and change convinced courts to reconsider giving parole to those who were convicted for their crimes made as a teen. In one case, Anthony Rolon was 17 years old when he committed a crime. He was helping his father with selling drugs but a party next doors got really loud.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays