10 Arguments Against Death Penalty

Superior Essays
The death penalty is a very controversial matter. Many people are against it, but there are also many people for it. The death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Capital punishment is inhumane, violates the constitution, it is biased, many innocent people die, it does not make the crime rate decrease, costs a lot, and is morally wrong in many religions. To begin with, it is inhumane and against the constitution. For example, Kill the Death Penalty: 10 Arguments Against Capital Punishment by Dan Brook, states that killing people makes us like the murders. Dan Brook also goes on to say “It’s bad enough that we are victimized by crime in our society; we don’t need to be further victimized by becoming perpetrators and enacting …show more content…
The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) has conducted a research of over a decade from 1991-2011, it concludes that the states without the death penalty have a lower murder rate than those with the death penalty. In 2005 the murder rate for states with capital punishment was 5.87 while the rate in those without it was 4.03, which is a forty-six percent difference (DPIC). Additionally criminals on death row are often times waiting over a decade to die which means they do not make the connection between their crimes and the punishment (Brook). Dan Brook states that the death penalty causes the brutalization effect. This means that when violence is condoned through the death penalty more violence happens (Brook). Some criminals are given publicity because of big trials and as soon as they are convicted with the death sentence or killed more violence follows. Texas leads in the amount of executions accounting for one third of the United States’ executions and this state still has a high murder and crime rate. The death penalty does not lower the criminal activity at all in any state. On top of it being wrong the death penalty costs the United States a lot of money. Jeffrey A. Fagan states in his essay that about two and half million to five million dollars is the cost per case that is spent on each execution. It costs about one million dollars for each killer convicted to life in prison without parole (Fagan). All that money spent on executions could be used in a wiser way such as hiring more officers or better law enforcement uses. If we had improved law enforcements then we would not need to spend so much money on killing criminals each

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Second Thought Of A ‘Hanging Judge’” David McCartin says “Rodney James Alcala, whom I sentenced to die more than 30 years ago… was again just sentenced last year for [5 more killings]” unfortunately since judge McCartin already sentence Alcala to death more than 30 years ago, the newly found victims families did not get to see Rodney get his justice. The death penalty cost these families their rights to find out who killed their victims, why they did it and see them be punished for it. The death penalty needs to end because it does not solve the problem and is cruel, it seems like the easy way out and it is expensive to kill someone.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in a civic view, it does not rely on anybody the right to take other people’s lives. Several countries and states throughout the United Sates, which have abolished capital punishment, noticed a subsequent decrease on what is called murder. In other words, the intention of capital punishment is to lower the murder rates, however, what it truly does is increasing it, leading capital punishment laws to a failure law enforcement. For example, in 1976, before capital punishment was abolished, three homicides were committed per 100,000 people in Canada. After the death penalty was abolished, 1.85 murders per 100,000 people in 2003.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 6, 2003, a man, known as the Vincent E. Brothers killed his entire family after church one Sunday morning. At church, he heard a rumor that his wife Joanie Harper wanted a divorce when he received this news he became furious. When they came home from he was nowhere to be found by his family. His family then went on to do what they did every Sunday and that was to take a nap. After they fell asleep an armed man with a .22 caliber pistol intruded the house and went to the back room, then shot the grandmother at point blank range.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty does not deter crime. It is viewed as inhumane and barbaric. Some argue that all human life is sacred. Some argue that the death penalty goes against every organized…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My opinion is people are scared of death, making the death penalty a great deterrence for murder. Life if jail just provides murderers with a place with shelter, food, and sometimes socialization, but is just a more confined way of living. Someone who lives on the street or in the cold for example may find this…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For those whom like to act as if they were God and take a life intentionally deserves to be punished. In fact, other than God whom can punish someone are the jails and prison that house these types of individuals. There are some cold blooded killers out in the world, along with some individuals whom are not mentally able to make conscious delinquent actions. In fact these types of people become inmates inside of correctional institutions that are housed in supermax sanctions have prompted arguments regarding people are for or against the death penalty, the bans on executions on the mentally retarded and juveniles are also addressed. Giving that this world is filled with a very mixed cultural background of all kinds of human beings.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Texas Death Penalty

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Death Penalty The death penalty has always been a very controversial topic to speak about because everyone has their own personal beliefs. The death penalty is to some as a way to severely punish people who have done awful things, now to others it is a kind of cruel and unusual punishment, something that in this country should not happen according to the United States Constitution. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court stopped the states from carrying out the death penalty for being racially biased etc. Texas then resumed executions in 1982 and is one of thirty-two states that imposes capital punishment, being by far the most active in killing convicted criminals.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ‘Killing people is wrong’, a statement everyone can stand behind, however, in some arguments, would depend on who did the killing (Koch 483). The death penalty has been under the watchful eye of the United States population for some time now, and has developed an audience on both sides of the argument. Many believe the death penalty is morally wrong, alluding to scriptures from the Bible. Others would argue the death penalty is a way of justice for the murderers and ultimately for the victims. The light shed from opposing views could help reach a resolve and put the issue at rest, however, in the meantime, one must pull from both sides to decide for themselves.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the Death penalty be allowed in the US Although there haven't been many executions since 1999, however, there were over 90 executions in the year 1999 according to CNN. In addition to this, the united states government hasn't executed anyone in over 60 years. Also, Texas has executed over 550 people in the last 40 years, according to the Washington Post. The death penalty should not be in effect in the united states of America.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty In Texas

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty does not act as a deterrent any better than other punishments. If it did, death penalty states would have lower rates of murder than non-death penalty states. This is not the case. The death penalty is hugely expensive.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By turning people into examples, it discourages others from making their mistakes. That, however, is not what happens. In reality, for those states that abolished the death penalty, the murder rate was on average 1.66 (per hundred thousand) lower than those who retained it in 2008-2012 (“Murder Rates”). There is a simple explanation for that phenomenon- consequences are the last thing on the mind of a killer. Most murderers end up being caught, yet that does not deter them from murdering.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty costs 2.16 million dollars per execution than the imprisonment of convicted murders for a lifetime (Jacqueline Brux). ii. Philip J Cook a Duke professor states that if the death penalty was repealed it would save the state 21 million dollars of cases in just the trial phase. II. Time a. Colorado i. In Colorado a study of the death penalty efficiency and functionality showed that it took six times the amount of days to pass one death penalty case than it did to pass one life-without-parole case.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People live in a society that is surrounded by violent behavior for that reason the justice uses the death penalty to send out a positive message for those who tend to commit capital offence. Capital punishment is not an act we wish to place on a single soul, but it is the best way to keep the killer out of society and prevent any further murders. There is no concrete evidence of either positive or negative effect, but this does not mean it would not help lower the crime rate. People need to understand that the best way to prevent any possible murders in the future is not let the killer walk free. The death penalty allows us to see the seriousness of a crime and the value of life.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays