Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
43 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
a coherent body of knowledge composed of research findings and tested theories for a specific discipline; both a product (end point) and a process (means by which you reach an end point)
|
science
|
|
- Objective reality, independent of human observation
- Control of the environment - Data are empirical, rooted in objectivity - Deductive process |
Positivist Paradigm
|
|
Karl Popper
|
Positivist Paradigm
|
|
- Reality is multiple and subjective
- Emphasis on human or “lived” experience - Data are words – narratives, subjective - Inductive process |
Naturalist Paradigm
|
|
(Thomas Kuhn, Max Weber)
|
Naturalist Paradigm
|
|
based on logical positivism; data are numeric/objective/empiric; process is deductive
- Build body of knowledge that describes, explains, predicts, prescribes - Formal, objective, systematic process - Data objective (5 senses) - Findings statistically analyzed - Emphasis on control/randomization - Humans are a composite of many body systems |
Quantitative Methods
|
|
based on naturalism; data are words; subjective; process is inductive
- Describe and promote understanding of human experiences - Formal, subjective, system, process - Data are words – narratives - Narratives analyzed for common themes - Often provide starting point - Lay groundwork for quantitative |
Qualitative Methods
|
|
Limitations of Quantitative Methods
|
- Human beings are complex, and are more than the sum of their parts
- Not all questions in nursing can be empirically tested |
|
Limitations of Qualitative Methods
|
- Small sample sizes
- Concern about generalizability |
|
Continuum of Research (levels)
|
- Description (qualitative and quantitative) lowest level
- Explanation (quantitative) - Prediction (quantitative) - Prescription (quantitative) highest level |
|
most sophisticated method in nursing for acquiring knowledge; accepted process for obtaining knowledge
|
Research or scientific inquiry
|
|
Ways of Acquiring Knowledge in Nursing:
|
Tradition
Borrowing Trial & error Personal experience Authority Research or scientific inquiry: |
|
– the broader study of nurses and the nursing profession, including historic, ethical, and political studies
|
research in nursing
|
|
Theory supported by research findings (evidence) becomes the foundation of theory-based clinical practice in nursing
- Theories must be tested to determine accuracy |
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
|
|
“the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of theory-derived, research-based information in making decisions about care delivery to individuals or groups. . .and in consideration of individual needs and preferences” Ingersoll (2000)
|
EBP
|
|
EBP: Three components
|
- research-based information
- clinical expertise of the nurse - patient preferences |
|
5 phases of Stetler Model
|
Preparation
Validation Decision making Apply the evidence Evaluate the the outcomes |
|
EBP models
|
Stetler, ARCC, mentorship
|
|
Focuses on: individual or group of practitioners
|
Stetler model
|
|
- Advance practice nurse with skill in EBP facilitates improvements in care via EBP
- Has been expanded by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt |
mentorship model
|
|
- Clarify the purpose
- Identify the sources of research evidence - Initiative the search for the relevant research evidence |
preparation phase
|
|
- Analyze the evidence
- Sufficient - Credible |
validation phase
|
|
- Organize the evidence
- Determine the meaning for practice - Decide what evidence to implement |
decision making
|
|
- Implement the change
- Not as easy as it sounds |
applying the evidence
|
|
- Evaluate the outcome
- Degree to which it was implemented - Were the desired outcomes met |
evaluate the outcomes
|
|
what does ARCC stand for?
|
Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration
|
|
steps in the EBP process
|
- Ask the burning clinical question
- Collect the most relevant and best evidence - Critically appraise the evidence - Integrate all evidence with one’s clinical expertise, patient preferences, and values in making a practice decision or change - Evaluate the practice decision or change |
|
Systematic reviews/meta-analysis of all RCTs
|
Level I of EBP Hierarchy of evidence
|
|
Evidence obtained from at least 1 RCT
|
Level II of EBP hierarchy of evidence
|
|
Evidence from CT without randomization
|
Level III of EBP hierarchy of evidence
|
|
Evidence from case-control & cohort studies
|
Level IV of EBP hierarchy of evidence
|
|
Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive/qualitative studies
|
Level V of EBP hierarchy of evidence
|
|
Evidence from 1 descriptive/qual study
|
Level VI of EBP hierarchy of evidence
|
|
Evidence from the opinion of authorities or expert committees
|
Level VII of EBP hierarchy of evidence
|
|
generates new knowledge
|
research question
|
|
make decisions about patient care based on the best current evidence gathered using a systematic problem-solving approach
|
EBP question
|
|
what does PICO stand for?
|
P: patient population or patient condition
I: intervention C: comparison O: outcome |
|
Barriers to the use of research
|
- Research findings not disseminated
- Some clinicians don’t read research or know how to evaluate it - Some don’t value research or don’t think they have the time - Some are aware of findings but don’t feel they have power or authority to make a change - Bringing change is not easy |
|
Specific practice recommendations that are based on a rigorous review of the best
evidence on a specific topic |
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
|
Why is research important to nursing?
|
- It is evidence upon which we base our practice
- Keeps practice current |
|
Characteristics of a Good Problem Statement Will identify what?
|
1.Variables to be studied
2. Population to be studied |
|
the question to be answered in the study
|
Research Question/problem statement
|
|
lays out how the researcher intends to go about answering the question
|
Purpose statement
|