• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/43

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

43 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
a coherent body of knowledge composed of research findings and tested theories for a specific discipline; both a product (end point) and a process (means by which you reach an end point)
science
- Objective reality, independent of human observation
- Control of the environment
- Data are empirical, rooted in objectivity
- Deductive process
Positivist Paradigm
Karl Popper
Positivist Paradigm
- Reality is multiple and subjective
- Emphasis on human or “lived” experience
- Data are words – narratives, subjective
- Inductive process
Naturalist Paradigm
(Thomas Kuhn, Max Weber)
Naturalist Paradigm
based on logical positivism; data are numeric/objective/empiric; process is deductive
- Build body of knowledge that describes, explains, predicts, prescribes
- Formal, objective, systematic process
- Data objective (5 senses)
- Findings statistically analyzed
- Emphasis on control/randomization
- Humans are a composite of many body systems
Quantitative Methods
based on naturalism; data are words; subjective; process is inductive
- Describe and promote understanding of human experiences
- Formal, subjective, system, process
- Data are words – narratives
- Narratives analyzed for common themes
- Often provide starting point
- Lay groundwork for quantitative
Qualitative Methods
Limitations of Quantitative Methods
- Human beings are complex, and are more than the sum of their parts
- Not all questions in nursing can be empirically tested
Limitations of Qualitative Methods
- Small sample sizes
- Concern about generalizability
Continuum of Research (levels)
- Description (qualitative and quantitative) lowest level
- Explanation (quantitative)
- Prediction (quantitative)
- Prescription (quantitative) highest level
most sophisticated method in nursing for acquiring knowledge; accepted process for obtaining knowledge
Research or scientific inquiry
Ways of Acquiring Knowledge in Nursing:
Tradition
Borrowing
Trial & error
Personal experience
Authority
Research or scientific inquiry:
– the broader study of nurses and the nursing profession, including historic, ethical, and political studies
research in nursing
Theory supported by research findings (evidence) becomes the foundation of theory-based clinical practice in nursing
- Theories must be tested to determine accuracy
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
“the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of theory-derived, research-based information in making decisions about care delivery to individuals or groups. . .and in consideration of individual needs and preferences” Ingersoll (2000)
EBP
EBP: Three components
- research-based information
- clinical expertise of the nurse
- patient preferences
5 phases of Stetler Model
Preparation
Validation
Decision making
Apply the evidence
Evaluate the the outcomes
EBP models
Stetler, ARCC, mentorship
Focuses on: individual or group of practitioners
Stetler model
- Advance practice nurse with skill in EBP facilitates improvements in care via EBP
- Has been expanded by Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt
mentorship model
- Clarify the purpose
- Identify the sources of research evidence
- Initiative the search for the relevant research evidence
preparation phase
- Analyze the evidence
- Sufficient
- Credible
validation phase
- Organize the evidence
- Determine the meaning for practice
- Decide what evidence to implement
decision making
- Implement the change
- Not as easy as it sounds
applying the evidence
- Evaluate the outcome
- Degree to which it was implemented
- Were the desired outcomes met
evaluate the outcomes
what does ARCC stand for?
Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration
steps in the EBP process
- Ask the burning clinical question
- Collect the most relevant and best evidence
- Critically appraise the evidence
- Integrate all evidence with one’s clinical expertise, patient preferences, and values in making a practice decision or change
- Evaluate the practice decision or change
Systematic reviews/meta-analysis of all RCTs
Level I of EBP Hierarchy of evidence
Evidence obtained from at least 1 RCT
Level II of EBP hierarchy of evidence
Evidence from CT without randomization
Level III of EBP hierarchy of evidence
Evidence from case-control & cohort studies
Level IV of EBP hierarchy of evidence
Evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive/qualitative studies
Level V of EBP hierarchy of evidence
Evidence from 1 descriptive/qual study
Level VI of EBP hierarchy of evidence
Evidence from the opinion of authorities or expert committees
Level VII of EBP hierarchy of evidence
generates new knowledge
research question
make decisions about patient care based on the best current evidence gathered using a systematic problem-solving approach
EBP question
what does PICO stand for?
P: patient population or patient condition
I: intervention
C: comparison
O: outcome
Barriers to the use of research
- Research findings not disseminated
- Some clinicians don’t read research or know how to evaluate it
- Some don’t value research or don’t think they have the time
- Some are aware of findings but don’t feel they have power or authority to make a change
- Bringing change is not easy
Specific practice recommendations that are based on a rigorous review of the best
evidence on a specific topic
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Why is research important to nursing?
- It is evidence upon which we base our practice
- Keeps practice current
Characteristics of a Good Problem Statement Will identify what?
1.Variables to be studied

2. Population to be studied
the question to be answered in the study
Research Question/problem statement
lays out how the researcher intends to go about answering the question
Purpose statement