• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Involuntary Manslaughter




By unlawful or dangerous act ->Constr Mans


~unlawful or dangerous act which results in death


~generally involves assault

R v. Larkin 1943


~waved blade with intent to frighten not kill - woman falls on blade cuts throat and dies


~guilty -> 'sober and reasonable person' would have realised the danger

The People v. Crosbie & Meehan 1966


~fight at the docks


~victim died from knife wound


~was used to intimidate, not self defense



D.P.P v. Wayne O'Donoghue 2006

~assaulted minor resulting in death


~Guilty of unlawful and dangerous manslaughter

1. The unlawful act must be dangerous


''The unlawful act must such as all sober and reasonable people would inevitably recognise the risk of harm'' Lord Justice Davis

R v. Church 1965


~couldn't perform sexually


~taunted -> unconscious


~believed death -> body in river


~COD = drowning


~convicted of manslaughter but should have been murder



R v. Dawson 1985


~3 men, attempted to rob petrol station


~60yr old clerk died of heart attack


~manslaughter conviction quashed on appeal as a reasonable person could not have known he had heart condition

R v. Watson 1989

~broke into home of 87 year old man


~heart attack


~on appeal, conviction quashed -> could not be establish the break in caused the heart attack

DPP v. Horgan 2007


~Horgan was convicted of rape and murder as 16yr old


~reduced to manslaughter


~ Kearnes J stated, 'dangerous' is to be judged objectively

.....

2. The unlawful act need not be directed at the victim

R v. Mitchell 1983


~Skip de-do-da the queue at post office.


~old man challenged him


~punched and pushed old man -> fell on elderly woman who broke her leg and subsequently died


~Found guilty of manslaughter


''Egg shell skull rule''

3. The act must be a criminal one

Andrews v DPP 1937


~drove van above the speed limit and overtook a car


~killed pedestrian


~convicted of manslaughter as reckless driving is a criminal offence

A.G. v. Maher 1937


~killed a man while driving without a valid license


~not a sufficient unlawful act


~''must be an act not an omission''

.....

4. The Act must cause death

R v. Cato 1976


~Cato bought heroin


~shared with friends


~his friend anthony farmer found dead next day


~Cato guilty of Manslaughter

5. One punch manslaughter

R v. Holzer 1968


~Holzer started fight with man


~Hit mans friend who fell and hit his head -> died as result


~Guilty of manslaughter


Justice Smith stated ''a person is guilty of manslaughter if the person dies from the infliction of force''

6. Action Short Physical Assault

DPP v Daley and McGhie 1980


~chased victim while throwing stones


~while trying to escape, tripped and fell -> found dead


~guilty of manslaughter


''his fear of being hurt was reasonable and was caused by the conduct of the defendants

R v. JM & SM 2012


~bro's fighting with doorman


~anurysm


~later collapsed


~no evidence of physical harm


->requirements are the unlawful act must be dangerous and would subject the victim to a form of physical harm

Creamer 1966




Results ''which are neither foreseen nor intended. can be the accident of death, which makes one guilty''

Gross negligent manslaughter


~defendant feels they are acting lawfully


~defendant causes death but did not intend to and therefore lacks mens rea



People(A.G.) v Dunleavy 1948


~taxi driver driving on wrong side with no lights on, hits and kills cyclist


~court of criminal appeal quashed his manslaughter conviction as they held that the negligence would have to be of a very high degree to warrant manslaughter conviction


~established The Dunleavy Test

The Dunleavy Test




~Was the accused negligent


~Did the negligence cause the death of the victim


~Was the negligence of a very high degree


~Did the negligence involve a high degree of risk

People(DPP) v. Cullagh 1999


~woman killed when thrown from chairoplane


~accused found guilty of gross negligent manslaughter as he was aware of the rides state of disuse and disrepair when he purchased it

English View:


~only risk of death will suffice for manslaughter conviction


~in ireland, risk of death or serious injury

R v. Adomako 1994


~anaesthetist failed to realise oxygen pipe became disconnected


~guilty of gross negligent manslaughter

R v. Wacker 2009


~Lorry driver


~60 Chinese illegal immigrants in container from rotterdam to uk


~58 sufficated


~held that although involved in illegal activity with accepted degree of risk on victim part -> accused owed duty of care


~convicted of gross negligent manslaughter

R v. Evans 2009


~supplied 17 year old sister with drugs and saw her overdose


~did not seek medical help for fear of the police


~her and her mother found guilty of gross negligent manslaughter

Omissions


Generally, criminal law does not punish a failure to act. Eg, if James sees Denise drowning and watches. James is not guilty of a crime.


However there is exceptions.

1 Duty of parent toward children

2 Duty voluntarily assumed

R v. Stone & Dobson 1977


~low intellect man living with girlfriend


~elderly sister lodger -> refused to eat


~wanted to call her doctor but she wouldnt tell them who her doctor was.


~She died -> guilty of manslaughter as had voluntarily assumed responsibility for the deceased

3. Creation of danger

R. Miller 1983


~homeless man sets fire to matress by dropping cigarette


~failed to put out fire


~guilty of manslaughter




R v. Evans 2009 -> summary on prev card

4. Duty under contract

R v. Pittwood 1902


~gatekeeper failed to close gate which resulted in death-> guilty of manslaughter




R v. Dytham 1979


~policeman failed to intervene in a fight


~man kicked to death


~found guilty of misconduct