The Importance Of Negligence

Great Essays
Introduction

Negligence by definition can be described as an act of carelessness dictated by the law for the protection of other people against foreseeable risk of harm that may occur from the act. A person can be held responsible for negligence when they have acted carelessly outside of a reasonable man conduct. This assignment is designed with aims to explain the circumstances and elements of how a negligent may be established, the consequences of decisions using relevant cases to highlight the importance of the negligent and its elements.
There are 3 elements of negligence that has to be observed when one is to decide whether a negligent has occurred and they are:
i. A duty of care is owed ii. Duty of care is breached iii. Losses due to
…show more content…
Citing the case of Donoghue v. Stevenson, an important case which sets the legal basis for negligence, the manufacturer of the ginger beer, Stevenson was held responsible for the injury inflicted on to Donoghue due to his negligent in preparation of his ginger beers. The facts of this case is that Donoghue whom has drank a bottle of ginger beer purchased by a friend, has became ill after discovering a snail carcass in the ginger beer. Stevenson in this was told that he ought to take care of his production in order to injure his neighbour; a person who are close and could directly be affected by his action. (E-Law Resources, …show more content…
The statements which turned out to be false stated that the company, Fidelity Plc had made a profit of 1.3Million Pounds when in fact, it has recorded a loss of 400,000 Pounds. Acting on this statement, Caparo had purchased shares in the company which he incurred losses after the company went bankrupt. Caparo sued claiming negligent but the court give judgment to the defendant on the reason that there was no duty of care owed. As it stands at the time, the auditors didn’t even know of Caparo which means that there was no sufficient proximity between the two parties. What came out of the case is what’s known as the Caparo Test which sets to distinct that the harm that may occurs is foreseeable and there has to be a proximity relationship which in this case, should have been Caparo seeking advice from the auditors instead of reacting on rumours. Finally, the duty of care imposed on a party must be just and fair. (e-law Resources,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The second element is a breach of the duty of care. A person or entity (such as a business or government agency) breaches the duty of care by not exercising reasonable care in fulfilling the duty. The third element is causation. The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two typed components of legal causation which are the actual cause and proximate cause.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Act Case Study

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Part - A Negligence Act Introduction: Lead that falls beneath the norms of conduct built up by law for the insurance of others against irrational risk of hurt. A man has acted carelessly in the event that he or she has withdrawn from the lead expected of a sensibly reasonable person acting under comparable conditions. With a specific end goal to set up carelessness as a Cause of Action under the law of TORTS, an offended party must demonstrate that the litigant had a duty to the offended party, the respondent ruptured that obligation by neglecting to comply with the required standard of lead, the defendant's careless direct was the reason for the mischief to the offended…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Essay

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What is tort Tort in law means a wrong or injury which has certain characters, from the most important of which is that it is redressable in an action for damages at instance of the person wronged or injured Torts are civil wrong resulting in personal injury or harm that constitutes grounds for a law suit.Thus, tort law addresses conflicts between conflicts between private individuals or entities According to Prof.Winfeild ,Tortuous liability arises from breach of a duty primarily fixed by law; this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressable by an action for unliquidated damages Sir John Salmond defines Tort as a civil wrong for which the remedy is common law action for unliquidated damages and which is not exclusively…

    • 1932 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case 2: Tort Of Negligence

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As a rule a straightforward utilization of the 'however for' test will resolve the subject of causation in tort law. Ie 'yet for' the respondent's activities, would the inquirer have endured the misfortune? In the event that yes, the litigant is not subject. On the off chance that no, the litigant is at risk. Causation may be risky where there exists more than one conceivable bring about.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The harm principle ensures that self-ruling and self-governance is implemented in society to the extent that it does not damage people in the process. In order to better understand the harm principle, we must take a deeper look into Mill’s theoretical approach of the concept. He first beings with distinguishing a difference between what is harm and a mere offence (Brink 2007, ch.3.6, para. 2). Harm is an action that is “injurious or set[s] back important interest[s] of particular people, interests in which they have rights,” whereas a mere offence is something that Mill’s does not see as a defence under the harm principle (Brink 2007, ch.3.6, para.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Omission

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Applying the ‘but for’ test seems to imply that omissions cannot in law cause a result. ‘But for’ an omission it is by definition true that the result would still have happened in exactly the same way. One response is to redefine the question and suggest that ‘but for’ the failure of the defendant to act, the harm would not have occurred. The second disadvantage relates to the burden of proof. This has been given topicality by the proposal in the Draft Code to replace the rule in Morby by a rule requiring it merely to prove that the omission “might” prevent the occurrence of the harm.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When discussing Negligence, it is imperative that we first explorer the law of Tort. This is a wrongful act whether it was intentional or accidental, leading to one being injured (cited from Law.com). To demonstrate that the defendant has committed an act or omission it may be necessary to prove that both a standard duty of care and damage has resulted in negligent behaviour. A person in a professional occupation such as a chartered surveyor has a higher duty of care because their field of work requires a particular skill. Therefore they have a greater responsibility to ensure that their actions do not cause damage.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lastly, the courts must see if it is just and reasonable to establish a duty of care. In this case, we can argue that it is indeed just and reasonable as a special relationship does exist and if the statements were not negligently prepared, damages could be avoided. Therefore, in conclusion of the three-stage test it can establish that a duty is…

    • 2534 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Research Paper

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper gives a short introduction of tort law and mainly focus on the standard of care, how the courts determining what is the ‘reasonable person’ and whether there are some exceptions to the courts. The law of tort is the law of civil liability for wrongfully injury which provides remedies to individuals harmed by the wrongful conduct of others in order to protect an individual’s private rights. There are two major categories of torts: intentional tort and negligent tort. The general principle of negligence is concerned with compensating people who have injured or damaged and thus a defendant will be negligent if he or she falling below the standard of the ordinary reasonable man in the same situation. A person will be liable for their…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, non-disclosure would only infringe on the people’s rights (Global Campaign for Free Expression, 1999, p. 3). It would be ethical to disclose information in such instances. Furthermore, in case non-disclosure involves hiding criminal acts and misuse of power, ethical practices dictates that one is obligated to report such offences. However, one must be careful not to threaten national security or incite conflict in the process of disclosure. It would be unethical if the disclosure was to negatively impact on the…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays