Jury Room In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Nelson Mandela once said that he believes “The death sentence is a barbaric act… It is the reflection of the animal instinct still in human beings.” Nelson Mandela was the president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999 and he always argued that the death penalty was an animal act. The death sentence was a large part of the play Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose. Although the jury room has been seen as one single aspect of a courtroom, there are really four elements that make the jury room.
The first element that works in a jury room is the evidence as remembered and interpreted by each individual juror. The way that one person views facts can be the complete opposite of how the next person views them. The importance of one piece of evidence can be significantly different from person to person. For example, after the 4th juror said, “ The boy admitted going out of his house at eight o'clock on the night of the murder after
…show more content…
In the beginning of the play juror seven says “Y’know, it’s hot”(10). This statement made by juror seven shows that he does not want to stay in the jury room too long. He is quick to jump to conclusions and change his mind because he just wants to leave. He has places to be so he is easily persuaded to change his mind.
Twelve Angry Men was written to show what really happens in a jury room. The four aspects that make up the courtroom are very different, yet they all attribute to the overall motion of a jury. Everything said and unsaid, affects the life of the defendant. The decision of the jury is not something to be taken lightly, and it has the power to change someone's life. The jurors are what hold our judicial system together, and that is not a simple task. The complexity of the jury room is why it works so well. Nothing great can ever be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is an important point” (241). His quiet, yet well-rounded personality generates sympathy and admiration among readers; thus, creating pathos. Juror 11’s history proves beneficial to the case, for he understands racial prejudice as much as the boy on trial does; thus, contributing to the overal ethos and logos, as well. For these reasons, readers congratulate Reginald Rose for his syntactical expertise and ability to reveal ethos, pathos, and logos with mere grammatical configurations. Twelve Angry Men is a simple play, yet its many components make it beneficial to education and memorable.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses reasonable doubt that is often portrayed in many real life juries mostly because of facts or opinions and consideration. In the play "Twelve Angry Men", Juror number Eight, is standing…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Juror 8 In 12 Angry Men

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For example, Juror #8 stood alone until the very and he managed to get every other juror. You don’t need to be like everyone else it’s okay to stand alone and just be you don’t worry or stress about how you have to have people on side in order to get things done because you really don’t need people who only try to make you into something you’re…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juxtaposing, Juror 3 shows courage in the play 12 Angry Men when one by one the other jurors are swayed to vote innocent. He stands by his verdict and strongly defends himself. Even though he was unconsciously judges the defendant based on prior experiences with children, he still stands firm in his decision that the boy…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the deliberation, Juror 8 is one of the few members of the jury feel sympathy because of his difficult childhood and his father’s continuous abuse and believes “That’s not a very good start” and thinks “maybe [the jury] owe him a few words” (13). Because feels sympathy towards the defendant and is passionate about giving him a fair trial. The first time the jury voted whether they believe the defendant is guilty or not guilty, all jurors except Juror 8 agreed to a guilty verdict. But before they voted a second time, Juror 8 said believes “there’s enough doubt to make us wonder whether he was there at all during the time the murder took place” (40) and as a result, two more jurors changed their vote to not guilty. Juror 8 is able to convince the other jurors to put aside their biases and prejudices opinions, and base their vote on the evidence presented during the…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proof is important when trying to persuade someone, because without proof then there is no persuasion. Proof is supporting evidence that backs your argument. Providing proof to back his argument, juror eight was able to persuade and impact the decisions of the other…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through being kind, being open, and thoughtful conversation, Juror Number Eight helps to shape the final resolution in a difficult murder case. Juror Number Eight appears to be an intelligent man who seeks justice and the truth. He is dressed nicely and is well put together. He shows compassion and respect. In the first vote taken by the jury, the result is eleven votes guilty with one vote not guilty.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men, Juror Seven's facetious appeals to humor juxtaposed with satiric ad hominem arguments suggest that his personal detachment from the suspect depreciates the jurors' consensus.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Besides being a gripping, triumphant story told in a unique way 12 Angry Men is in many ways a tale of a Devil’s Advocate and how his leadership allows the jury of which he is a member to open themselves to new information, perspectives, and possibilities. Juror 8 is subtly implied to be the “good guy” by his dress; the only pure white suit among a dozen modes of dress, and initial script blocking; going straight to the window, the only initial source of light in the room and almost wistfully gazing out at the sky to the point of distraction. From the outset, he is portrayed almost as an Angel’s Advocate among devils. He then proceeds to voice the only dissenting opinion and to explore it rigorously enough to allow all the other jurors to…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays