Communication Issues for Researchers Essay examples

1818 Words 8 Pages
Communication Issues for Researchers A scientific researcher faces many obstacles while trying to conduct a research project. The researcher’s inability to communicate clearly what he or she is trying to do can result in difficulties throughout the process. Grant applications to fund projects and scientific papers to document results are often as important as the work itself. Besides standard written documentation and applications, a researcher will develop oral presentations for various stakeholders as part of the process. PowerPoint slide decks and scientific posters will also be developed to support discussion with visual media. This paper will address some of the problems that researchers face in successfully communicating their …show more content…
Fanelli (2010) points out that a paper’s success often depends on its outcomes, and the success of a researcher’s career is measured in part by number of publications. For communicating with the public, Bucchi (2013) says that it is difficult to determine what methods are good, bad or average and that there has not been enough activity around supporting a culture of communication.
Scientific inaccuracies are the immediate result of communication problems. According to Zimmer (2012), an investigation by Dr. Ferric Fang and Dr. Arturo Casadevall reveals that the pressure to publish is making some scientists cut corners, make mistakes and sometimes behave unethically. Realistically, scientists must publish their work, as this is the method for sharing their discoveries. Researchers, however, appear to be losing focus on the purpose of their writing which is to convey research results in lieu of producing more papers and in publishing in prestigious journals. Like many of his peers, Fanelli (2010) also supports the idea that the publishing at all costs mentality creates an environment which limits objectivity and integrity. Similarly, in slide presentations done among their research peers, large amounts of data may be displayed in dramatic fashion while more important conclusions and relevant data are not communicated well, or not covered at all (Rubenson, 2013). In communicating research to the public, large numbers of retractions

Related Documents