Why Is Capital Punishment Unjust

Better Essays
Capital punishment also known as the death penalty, in the simplest terms, is the act of executing a person for crimes that they have committed. As far back as we can go humans have killed each other. We have systematically killed each other for centuries, whether is it was genocide or execution; humans have ended life at the discretion of their peers. One might ask why we still hold these terrifying traditions to this day. The death penalty is unjust because it is a horrendous thing to do to a human, it is more expensive then imprisoning them and it does not always bring satisfaction or relief to family members of the victim.

The death penalty can be administered in many different ways. The most common way is through lethal
…show more content…
Some feel it provides justice or scares criminals from committing crimes. Others say they would rather not pay for the criminal to be in jail, or that they don’t feel they deserve to be let off easy. They say that if the prisoners were to escape they would be a threat to society. They feel that there is no way to save these people from their dark and evil ways. An article written by the LA times states, “Every legal argument against the death penalty begins with the 8th or 5th Amendment. The 8th bars "cruel and unusual punishments," and the 5th guarantees "due process of law" before a person can be "deprived of life, liberty or property." But there is no serious constitutional argument against the death penalty.” They take the argument of it being constitutionally legal. According to the Supreme Court this is true. Although this is true, that does not mean that it is just. The Constitution may be the law of the land, but it is not the moral compass. It was written in a different time when slavery was legal and humans’ rights barely existed if at all. We live in a new day and age, one where we can make changes for the betterment of society. Some people simply do not see it that …show more content…
They would also say that there are interest groups based on victim’s families who didn’t want their aggressor to be executed. The second, which is the largest misconception, is that it is in fact cheaper to put someone in jail for life then to execute them. For example California could save over 1 billion dollars over a five-year period if it eliminated the death penalty. In an article released by USA Today they said, ‘"It 's 10 times more expensive to kill them than to keep them alive," though most Americans believe the opposite, said Donald McCartin, a former California jurist known as "The Hanging Judge of Orange County" for sending nine men to death row.”’ In California he average process takes over twenty years before and execution is carried out. That us twenty years of paying for the housing and feeding of these criminals and paying for the legal system to process all the appeals. This wastes millions of taxpayer dollars. The third is that some victim’s families feel that the execution does not bring them justice; it in fact brings them the feeling of the responsibility of the loss of more life and robs them of the chance of ever finding forgiveness in their heart, which is essential to the grieving process. Some argue that it is deterrence but many studies show that a criminal who does these awful acts rarely have any value of their own life. If they don’t

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because there are too many innocent people sentenced to death, death penalty trials are much more expensive than life imprisonment, there are botched executions, unfairness against the economically disadvantaged, and racism is present in the trials. Capital Punishment has been the forefront for debate for many…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, people who are up on the death penalty could be innocents that were falsely accused. Also, the death penalty cost the government a lot of money and is usually racially biased. The death penalty should be abolished because the government contributing unnecessary large amount of funding, it’s racially biased, and could be killing innocent and violates our rights. The government funds vast amount of money just to kill someone on death penalty. The amount of money required for the…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anyways, Capital Punishment is executing someone who committed a severe crime. The Death Penalty has been a very heavy issue over the years or even decades. People are either specifically for or against Capital Punishment. Executing these criminals is an inhumane punishment. The government needs to investigate more into the innocent…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unfair Death Penalty

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If a criminal has done awful things, do they really deserve to live? Do we really want to waste oxygen on these human beings that clearly have no regard for other human life? Many of the people on death row have been offered second chances, but squandered those chances. If they mess up more than once, then what is the point of locking them up and hoping that they learn their lesson. Well, killing them will not solve the problem, it would just push it away for a little while.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I want closure if something happened; I want them to be punished for that. I would feel like prison is not enough for that, even a life sentence. The death penalty is wrong but is it better to have them dead? I grew up on the basis that killing, even hurting someone is morally wrong. Not only that, the law even states that too.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished When people think about inhumaneness, do they think of the death penalty? Killing a human just like a dog being put down. The United States government is doing just that. The government has sentenced many more people to death row and they are facing an unjust punishment. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because of its inhumaneness and lack of moral values.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But it also could be quite costly. The death penalty is 10 times more expensive than a life sentence. One side might say that peace and safely are worth the cost and that it is for the sake of the people. It may give them peace of mind which could keep them focus on their lives. Some debate if the government justified to be able to choose whether someone lives or die.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government killing someone over a crime is absurd. The only thing that they are doing is adding to the problem. If someone is put to death because they murdered someone, you end up having two people dead instead of just one. There are plenty of other ways to punish criminals that are not so barbaric. We have things like life imprisonment without parole.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capital punishment is a very controversial topic in america right now because of moral reasons such as if they killed why should we kill them. Also why should we have a the right to take a life if the reason why we are killing is because the man took a life. The cost is another part of the controversy, because it costs more to kill the prisoner than it does to keep them in prison for life without parole. Prison is supposed to be punishment for the bad things people do so if prison is worse than outside life why do we have it. Finally people always wonder if capital punishment has something to do with racism because if it does than people want to get rid of it completely.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays