Why Is Capital Punishment Wrong

Improved Essays
Capital punishment or the death penalty is killing or executing a person, by the government, who was found guilty of a serious crime. Capital crimes are crimes that can result in being sentenced to the death penalty. Because there is no repeal from death, executions are considered the ultimate punishment for a crime. The clear alternative to capital punishment is life in prison without parole, however multiple nations still perform the death penalty. This is because the debate whether capital punishment is ethically and justifiable is still widely disputed. Prison for life is often believed to be a possible alternative to executing a person. The sentence is cheaper to tax-payers and keeps violent offenders off the streets for good. However, …show more content…
“We’re only human, we all make mistakes,” is a commonly used phrase, but it’s tried and true. Some people were being executed based on random choice or personal desire, rather than any reason or system. “The justices of the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling, decided that the death penalty was indeed being applied in arbitrary, inconsistent ways, clearly a situation in which racism could prevail unchecked.”(Stewart 59) According to Amnesty International, “The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims.” The drastic measure of capital punishment should not be taken. It does not allow the opportunity for the accused to be proven innocent, a violation of the Fifth Amendment which guarantees due process of law. Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They argue that "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators never have an opportunity to cause a future tragedy. “350 people were not wrongly executed. Of those 350 cases, only 200 of the alleged wrongful convictions involved first-degree murders for which the death penalty was actually an option. Of those 200, only 139 were actually sentenced to death. Of those 139, only 23 were actually executed.”(Stewart 72-73) The death penalty violates religious beliefs about killing, remains unfair to minorities and is unconstitutional, and is inhumane and barbaric. Some people disagree that the death penalty is the defense to crime and worry that innocent people may be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To quote Gandhi, “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” This quote holds some key evidence for the death penalty. Taking one man’s life to justify the murder of another is preposterous! Executing someone does not restore balance. At the start of researching the death penalty, my view was initially in favor of the death penalty, but after all the research and facts, my conclusive view is against the death penalty. I found that my views changed and even though I might have been for the death penalty at the beginning, after my research I found that the death penalty is nothing more than the government reminding everyone that in the end, they have the final say.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again. We need to consider our safety and stop these killers from committing more murders. Many people who are against the death penalty, of course, may want to question whether there is an alternative way to protect society without the use of capital punishment. Such as, putting the criminals in prison for life. Though I concede that putting away the felons can help, I still insist that murderers get the death penalty because it is the only way to 100% guarantee that they will never kill again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty, often known as capital punishment, is the punishment of execution given to a person who has been legally convicted of a crime. It has been a highly controversial issue, and there are many American citizens who support this system, and many who do not. Some argue that the criminals who have been sentenced to death deserve to die, to pay for the harm that they have done to others. They also view execution as a deterrent for crime. However, the system has not been successful in reducing crime in our society, and I do not see how it will do so in the future.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypocritical Death Penalty

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just to think that prison is like hell on earth due to the matter prisoners are faced with being gang-raped, castrated, beaten to death, stabbed, and sometimes even beheaded before correctional officers whom may turn a blind eye to what’s going on in there. [4] Capital punishment Is capital punishment the best answer? If murders have the power to take a victim’s right to live away, then the criminal justice system should have the same power to correct the deficiency by taking the criminal’s life. [4] Human life has no price tag on it. Some critics whom are against capital punishment believe that life is so precious that even the worst criminal’s life should not be taken.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, in Stephen Nathanson’s writing “An for an Eye”, he suggests the second stage is the death penalty in practice. Nathanson believes the death penalty is completely justified, but in most cases it could be unjustified in practice. Legal judiciaries that impose the death penalty are not the ones leading to the execution of innocent humans. Nathanson also suggested the death penalty is inconsistent with the value of justice in society specifically. Nathanson’s argument is inconsistent with the value of justice, because the death penalty was imposed due to the extent of the specific crimes committed.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Black men in 2010 was 44347 inmates per 100,000 and the rate of white men rate was 678 per 100,000 prisoners on death row. Finally, the death penalty is used for revenge. Death penalty is all unacceptable practice that sows vengeance and does not bring justice to victims of crimes. No matter how serious the crime, to kill a convicted person is an offense to the inviolability of life and to the dignity of the human person, The death penalty can be used but only if this the only possible way for punishment. It also stresses the importance of not removing the possibility of redemption from a person convicted.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, what must be looked at his how many cases that weren’t affirmed and dispirit the capital felons mental state they were put to death anyway. In these articles the scholars make perfect sense as to why they death penalty is pointless. This punishment is simply inhumane and it contradicts everything this constitutions states. In many cases the eighth amendment becomes a major factor: cruel and unusual punishment. This ac is also in violation of the right to life under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many death row cases are based on eyewitness information, because the case lacks leads from other sources, which leaves the prosecutors to relay on the eyewitness, as described in the innocent execution of Carlos Luna (10 Convicts Presumed Innocent After Execution, 2010). Senator Raymond Lesniak explains in his speech at the International Human Rights Competition that revenge will only open the door to evil and redemption will bring out the peace by forgiveness, the following quote is from his speech, “The need for revenge leads to hate and violence. Redemption opens the door to healing and peace. Revenge slams it shut” (Lesniak). It is undeniably hard to imagine why people are for the death…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indisputably, the death penalty is only warranted for limited reasons such as mass murderers, serial killers, and the killers of children and the elderly. The first type of murderer who deserves to be on death row is the killer of numerous people all at one time. It is hard to fathom that such a person would do something so terrible to innocent lives. Edward Koch, former mayor of New York, states, “when we protect guilty lives, we give up innocent lives in exchange” (487). Koch’s point could not be more true because, if we fail to put someone on death row for mass murder the we do not avenge the innocent lives that were taken.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that the government is perfect does not exist, and if the courts will convict an individual incorrectly in the beginning, it is probable that the incorrect individual will be executed. The danger of this happening is immense as it could also leave the actual criminal out on the streets to continue their crimes while ending the life of an innocent man. This has happened to Carlos DeLuna, Larry Griffin, David Spence and many more, all who were convicted of crimes and executed or put on death row until later discovered the trial…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics