Defendant Insanity Case Study

Improved Essays
Defendant’s plea Insanity Insanity is identified as a defense for criminals and they use it as an excuse defense because they claim that when they are committing that certain crime they are not using their minds correctly or they were not thinking, a lot of different excuses for pleading insanity. The process criminals have to go through if the criminals plea insanity is the psychiatric testimony has to try and prove if the defendant understood what they did wrong and they decide if the defendant was sane enough or if they are mentally disable. Defendants should not be able to use insanity as an excuse defense. (Larry J. Siegel, P. 139).

Why should an Insanity Defense not be an excuse? Pleading for Insanity should not be used
…show more content…
There are many different types of ways a defendant can claim that the reason they did a certain crime was because of one of these four sources.
There are a specific types of rules when someone wants to use the insanity defense. One rule of the Insanity Defense is The M’naghten Rule, this means that the person who committed this crime could not tell what they were doing or what was going on, they could not tell what was right or what was wrong. This is used in most states. Another rule that you have to follow is called The Irresistible Impulse, this rule is used mostly, it means that the person who did what they did, did not know that this was illegal and they could not control what was going on because of the mental illness that they have. They sometimes claim that it was an
…show more content…
A long time ago, 1981, someone named John Hinckley fell in love with Jodie Foster. Since he was in love with her, he decided that he wanted to get her attention in some way, he decided try and shoot Ronald Raegan. Ronald Raegan was shot underneath his arm, but he did not get killed. John Hinckley only shot him because he wanted to get notice by the girl he fell in love with. In his trial, he was found not guilty because he plead insanity. After that happened, the Insanity plea was not allowed as an excuse in a lot of states and it became even more strict.
It became stricter by different states saying that they are limiting the amount of times that you get to defend yourself about what you did wrong or what mental illness caused you to do that certain crime. Ever since then, the Insanity plea does not get used as much as it used too, even when a defendant uses it, most of the times it is likely that they will still be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To the contrary, the legal definition shows that it is a very serious mental illness and cannot just be thrown around. This change in definition helps the reader to better understand the verdicts and helps them to see the legal system in a logical way. In this particular case, the lawyers that Dr. Lunde was testifying against were trying to use the insanity plea in order to protect their client when in reality it was just hurting them and making them appear desperate. Dr. Lunde’s words on the topic unveil some of the cheats used in the legal…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Serial Killers Essay

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited

    According to law, a person is “not guilty by reason of insanity” if they do not have the capacity to know right from wrong, therefore;…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 6 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This Court will have to allow this defense because in Arizona 's limited insanity defense in Clark v. Arizona, and denied certiorari in Delling v. Idaho, a case alleging that Idaho 's replacement of the insanity defense with a "Guilty but mentally ill" verdict constitutes a due process violation. Because of the weighty implications of the decision to plead insanity, the defendant must be the one to decide whether to use the insanity…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some people are up against the concept of insanity defense where they believe everyone who commits crime must take the criminal responsibility for their deviant behavior. On the other hand, there are group of people who believe the NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system, in order to sustain the equality for mentally ill person. Thus, the question of whether NCRMD is necessary in our criminal justice system is not a black or white question where there is a clear answer. However, the truth is that the NCRMD defense has created in our criminal justice system with a good purpose of providing equal rights for the mentally disordered people. This criminal defense does not exists and works as the sink hole for the accused to easily escape or avoid his or her criminal responsibility.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mrs. Andrea Yates past life showed that she has had a history of mental illness. Mrs. Andrea Yates had been brought to the hospital many times for strings of mental cases that she had received treatment for because she had harsh depression and the depression came due to psychosis. One time when Yates was in the hospital, she was described as an intensely psychotic woman. Yates has tried many times to commit suicide; for instance one time she tried to overdose by using antidepressants and even after that did not work she attempted to murder herself by stabbing herself. Yates has been through unfavorable paranoia.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Competency to stand trial is different from insanity defense when it comes down to the…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “You must plead insanity. You must give the jury a way out. You must show them a way to find him not guilty if they are so inclined. If they’re sympathetic, if they want to acquit, you must provide them with a defense they can use to do it. It makes no difference if they believe the insanity crap.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many experts that have explored the idea of how the Insanity Defense could be “fixed” for the public to agree with. Richard Bonnie, a professor of public policy, law and medicine at the University of Virginia, has came to the theory that the insanity defense should not be abolished but should be narrowed. He came to the conclusion that the criteria of what qualifies for “Insanity”, by narrowing the criteria, it will help persuade the public that the insanity defense is not harmful for the overall public, but it is a healthier outcome. Another way to help the public agree is to inform the public what actually happens in these court cases, and help sort out the…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity plea is a necessary modality for the legal system to possess; however there are many holes in the current defense that have caused criminals to find an escape, and because of this, there should be stricter stipulations in place on the…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Here’s an example; A man went to a party to get revenge on someone and was going to shoot them, but other party goers stepped in the way to protect the person he was trying to shoot. The man had shot them and they died, he might then think “no witnesses” and kill everyone else at the party. When this case is taken to court, this man could be charged for manslaughter. If he pleads innocent on the account that he wasn’t thinking straight and couldn’t tell right from wrong due to a mental illness, he may be given less time in prison and psychological treatment, but no one would want a mass murderer to get a shorter sentence, for all they know he might have only pleaded insanity to escape a longer sentence. The…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not Guilty by reason of insanity” This could be used in a plea in a court of a person charged with a crime who admits the act, but whose attorney says that they were too mentally ill at the time to determine whether it was right or wrong. In the short story, “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allan Poe it describes a crazy man who kills another man. The story takes place in an old house in the old man’s bedroom. The main character explains to the reader about his obsession of the old man. His obsession is concerning the old man’s “vulture looking” eye.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity defense has been around for centuries and has always been the center of debate. According to Zachary D. Torry and Stephen B. Billick (2007), a crime must have two key attributes evil intent (mens rea)…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics