The Importance Of The Insanity Defense

Improved Essays
Why the Insanity Defense should not be Abolished Is it possible to absolutely, without a doubt measure the capacity of insanity? The Insanity defense has been a very controversial topic of conversation for as long as it has been around, although it is the least used criminal defense. There are many reasons why the Insanity defense becomes the topic of conversation is the fact that many people are misinformed about the basis of the insanity defense and what actually happens in these cases. There are many misconception about the insanity defense such as: many people think that it is very easy to fabricate in the court room, they think that it is the easy way out for people who think they do not deserve to go to prison, and also they think that …show more content…
In the court cases that the Insanity Defense and is successful, 90% of the defendants that plead insanity have been previously diagnosed with a mental illness. (Lithwick).The Insanity Defense was first created it was used more as an argument for the defendant to pardon themselves from a sentence. Defendants that are found not fit to stand trial and plead insanity; will then in most cases be committed to a mental institution. The mental institutions that the defendants are sent to after the trials are in some cases worse than prisons. In the mental intuitions there is no allocated time period that the defendant will be in the intuitions, in some cases the offender will be committed for the rest of their lives. The most notable case that involved the Insanity defense was the case of John Hinckley Jr., this case painted the Insanity Defense in a negative light because many people believed that he should have been imprisoned for the rest of his life or …show more content…
There are many experts that have explored the idea of how the Insanity Defense could be “fixed” for the public to agree with. Richard Bonnie, a professor of public policy, law and medicine at the University of Virginia, has came to the theory that the insanity defense should not be abolished but should be narrowed. He came to the conclusion that the criteria of what qualifies for “Insanity”, by narrowing the criteria, it will help persuade the public that the insanity defense is not harmful for the overall public, but it is a healthier outcome. Another way to help the public agree is to inform the public what actually happens in these court cases, and help sort out the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Sane Enough to Die Imagine a state of paranoia so great that it starts to seem as if one’s own thoughts are not their own, or auditory and visual hallucinations that continuously speak of the inferiority of the masses, creating an intense sense of superiority in oneself. Such experiences are just a few of the possible symptoms of schizophrenia, a fairly well recognized psychological disorder present in today’s society. Psychological disorders are an incredibly real issue in the modern world that do not receive nearly enough consideration and understanding. It is this issue of mental illness that creates much controversy and indecisiveness in establishing legal guidelines for determining mental competence in the eyes of the law. Specifically, the Supreme Court case of Ford versus (v) Wainwright attempted to establish the constitutionality of executing someone deemed psychologically unfit after the trial process, as well as adequate procedures for doing so.…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malingering (Faking) the Insanity Defense The story at the beginning of this paper illustrates this issue well, even though, it is quite uncommon. Studies have shown that about 82% of insanity defendants have been diagnosed with major medical illnesses. So, what about the 18% that were not diagnosed with a mental illness? Could it be that they were faking it the whole time?…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the mental disorder or defect causes impairment in the person’s ability to appreciate or control their behavior, which then results in the criminal offense. It is important to recognize that the mere coexistence of a mental disorder and a criminal offense does not prove insanity; you have to be able to show the direct connection of how the disorder or defect influenced or caused the criminal…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Their proof must show that the accused has criminal liability, accountability, or culpability (Pg. 255). In the absence of one or both of the attributes the insanity may be used. To begin with, as stated by Torry and Billick, the insanity defense was used as far back as 1581 when there was a legal note in place for those who could distinguish the difference between right and wrong and those who could not (Pg. 256). By the Eighteenth Century the insanity defense was distinguished by, if the accused could only understand the ramifications of what he had done like an infant or even a wild animal would, then he would not be held responsible for said crime. Today, however, the law uses several different rules, including the M’Naghten rule, to determine if person’s mental state during the act of committing the crime was such that he will use the insanity defense.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The insanity defense states that a criminal defendant should not be found guilty due to the defendant inability to know what he or she was doing was against the law. What the insanity defense is stating is that a person who is insane lacks the intent required to perform a criminal act because the person either does not know that the act is wrong or cannot control his or her actions even when the person understands that the act is wrong. Insanity is hard to define, and the circumstances in which insanity can be used to excuse criminal responsibility are difficult to characterize. It is hard to really know if a person is actually insane or if they are using that excuse to get away with a crime.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, Judge Awotwi, presided over the mock trial State Prosecution vs. Macbeth, and it is my duty to uphold the rule of law and instruct true justice upon this issue. The defendant entered a plea of insanity due to delusional compulsion before this court on October 24, 2017, after committing beyond a doubt one count of murder and two counts of felony murder. The question is not whether Macbeth committed these crimes, or if he is judged to be found guilty; it is to judge if the defendant “did not have [the] mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong”, and that is the responsibility of the court (16-3-2). Due to the facts presented in court I have come to a verdict. The defense’s unique argument and main points overwhelmed the predominant…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The insanity defense has nothing to do with a defendants current mental status to be found not guilty by reason of insanity” According to Insanity Defense FAQs in paragraph two. A judge or jury will evaluate the defendant to determine their…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mrs. Andrea Yates past life showed that she has had a history of mental illness. Mrs. Andrea Yates had been brought to the hospital many times for strings of mental cases that she had received treatment for because she had harsh depression and the depression came due to psychosis. One time when Yates was in the hospital, she was described as an intensely psychotic woman. Yates has tried many times to commit suicide; for instance one time she tried to overdose by using antidepressants and even after that did not work she attempted to murder herself by stabbing herself. Yates has been through unfavorable paranoia.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Sociopathy Vs Psychopathy

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The problem associated with this is that fact that because of this the standards to claim insanity were easier to do with the DSM than by the PCL-R. The DSM is what is more commonly used in Frye Jurisdictions. This evidence shows the unequal advantage of how the simplicity of what jurisdiction and individual is in can show significant impact on…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tests for insanity include M’Naghten Rule and the American Law Institute Model Penal Code. The M’Naghten Rule focuses on whether defendant knew nature of the crime or understood right from wrong at the time the crime was committed. Under the American Law Institute (ALI) a defendant may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if lacking either cognitive or volitional (irresistible impulse) capacity. The ALI test provides “A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to the appreciate the criminality (wrongfulness) of his conduct or to conform this conduct to the requirements of the law” (Goldstein. Morse, & Packer, 2013, p.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That’s not important in the jury room (Grishman 107)”. The insanity plea is used for a wide variety of cases. Part of the outcome is that the accused convicts of the cases believed that they were legally insane while committing the crime. Furthermore, a majority of the insanity pleas is rejected which makes it extremely rare to follow through. Through such cases, the insanity plea is commonly used as an excuse to prevent themselves from going to prison.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The presence of this plea option has led to controversy in the law world; some think that the plea should be diminished while others notice its necessity. Nevertheless, there are people with mental illness in our society that commit crimes just as those without mental illness do. There should be a system that protects the rights of those with mental illness, but there is a lot of grey area with the current system in place because it is difficult to tell if the person was not in a sane state at the time the crime took place when the trial often occurs months later. Those who plea guilty by reason of insanity are required to go through an extensive psychological…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Insanity Defense History

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, criminals have been categorized as insane, but does that justify their crime? The majority of higher profile criminals file for the insanity plea which then affects their punishment and life, causing us to consider if ours is safe. The insanity defense should not be admissible in court because of the interest for the public, increases in legal costs, and manipulation of the legal system. The insanity defense’s history plays into our everyday legal actions and in order to understand the problem, you need to understand the defense.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state will imprison but also treat the defendant for their mental illness if they were declared “guilty but mentally ill”. There is an approval of the defense because the mentally ill defendant couldn’t understand that the criminal act they were committing was illegal. When the defendants are declared “not guilty by reason of insanity” then they will go free of prosecution and might be treated for their mental illness. People agree with the Insanity Defense because they think that the “insane” were not in the right mind at the time of the criminal action and could not decipher right from wrong or they didn’t know that their actions were criminal. These people think that the Insanity Defense is fair because, when the defendant is declared mentally insane than they may be incarcerated and treated; which will punish for the criminal act and treat them for their illness or they may only be treated which is believed to show that treatment is the goal and the way that is wanted to use to help the mentally ill instead of punishing them.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Bartol and Bartol (2011, p. 244) if an individual pleads not guilty by the circumstance of insanity, then the psychiatric evaluation should be focused on the individual 's mental state at the time of the crime. This basis is very much in line with the recommendation of Dr. Siegel in his letter to the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays