Thomas Hobbes As An Atheist

Improved Essays
There is a debate among scholars of Hobbes whether Hobbes was an atheist, or even whether his philosophy was atheist. There are fewer critics today of Hobbes that make the claim he is an atheist and that his philosophy is itself atheist. It should not be understood to be so. We have to remember that though his views opposed most of the standard views of his time, Hobbes affirmed his faith in Christianity. Also, the term “atheist” had a different connotation prior to modernity. This is to say that Hobbes’s beliefs contrasted with the norm at the time. The question also to be posed is to whether a philosophy or thought can be extricated from the thinker’s bias. Even if Hobbes himself was a devout orthodox Christian, there is an understanding …show more content…
The norm was a philosophy of theism. Across disciplines, theoreticians would underwrite their ideas with references to Christian teachings. This is observable from Meditations on First Philosophy by Descartes, to Liebnez’s Discourse on Metaphysics that explains the perfect nature of God and the consequences this entails. Some arguments run back and forth about the nature of Thomas Hobbes’s personal beliefs, about whether he was a disguised atheist. Different writers will point to different texts and come to conclusions about the nature of Mr. Hobbes’s beliefs. Hobbes should be taken at his word, based on his writing from Elements of Law: When it happeneth that a man signifieth unto us two contradictory opinions whereof the one is clearly and directly signified, and the other either drawn from that by consequence, or not known to be contradictory to it; then (when he is not present to explicate himself better) we are to take the former of his opinions; for that is clearly signified to be his, and directly, whereas the other might proceed from error in the deduction, or ignorance of the repugnancy. (69) Hobbes never wavered in public about what his personal beliefs were. It is from this premise that all public statements that Thomas Hobbes professed about his Christian theology must be accepted at face …show more content…
The theory of governance then presupposes the unity is based on command given by God. The question then becomes: if a political sphere that came together under contract, what are the ramifications for the encountering of two spheres that have different basis for a contract. Would the sphere of the Hobbesian contract consider this outside group as just another "man" in the state of nature, or this other entity just part of the state of nature itself? This then raises the question whether this “other” becomes

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Thomas Hobbes established his own ideas about people and politics. For example, Hobbes believed that humans were selfish and did anything to better their position. Also, he believed that nations were selfishly motivated and only battled for power and wealth…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    European philosophers as early as the seventeenth century begin debating how to run government. As different forms of democracy come about, wars breakout amongst European nations. Ideas on human nature and how man runs government spread throughout the world, determining for years the ways of society. The first philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, promotes the strict monarchy of commonwealth, the second, John Locke, promotes the liberal monarchy, and the last, Jean-Jacques Rousseau promotes liberal republicanism. Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, born in 1588 of Malmesbury, is most known for his work in modern political philosophy.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many of Hobbes’ ideas are derived from the basic assumption that all humans are intrinsically selfish. We are all born relatively equal in our physical and intellectual capacities and so we are constantly striving to be better than others. This comes with being an autonomous individual. We are all responsible for ourselves, so the next logical step is to serve ourselves. He is a materialist, so he does not believe in any form of a higher, divine being.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are two interesting facts about him? Hobbes believed that humans were all naturally selfish and wicked after seeing the English Civil War. He believed in absolutism, the belief that all power should be vested into one ruler, which many people didn’t agree with. He was also the tutor of the exiled prince of Whales.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is the “creature” formed by the following covenant: “I Authorise and give up my Right of Governing my selfe, to this Man, or to this Assembly of men, on this condition, that thou give up thy Right to him, and Authorise all his Actions in like manner.” The ruler can take three forms. It can be a DEMOCRACY, under the rule of all; an ARISTOCRACY, under the rule of a part; or a MONARCHY, under the rule of one. Of these, the superior choice is the MONARCHY, as the monarch’s best interest is the same as the nation, can operate in any manner conducive to running a commonwealth, unfairly rewards fewer people, and have less trouble with succession. The creation of the LEVIATHAN is the last piece of Hobbes’s puzzle of contracts: the way to enforce the fulfillment of the contract.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes states that “in order to live a more contented life… men must give up their freedom to the State” (Document 2). He believed that people were naturally cruel and needed protection from themselves. Hobbes wanted rule by absolute monarchs. He thought it was the only way to keep people in check. His beliefs closely supported how many people thought back then.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many ways, the psyche of Malcolm X and Hobbes are very contrastive. But, there were many clear similarities between the two respective philosophers. Political Legitimacy is elaborated upon by each philosopher immensely in each piece of writing. The main differing idea on political legitimacy between the two philosophers was their opinion regarding the government. Malcolm, who grew up experiencing institutional and personal racism, had many critiques of the government.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes arrived at the idea that all people were created equal because he felt that in a natural world without government that everyone was created equal. He also believed that this was part of the problem – the reason that people chose to rebel and combat each other to fulfill their interests because that meant that no person could rise above…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant On Morality

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay is solely based on the German philosopher Kant Immanuel and British philosopher Thomas Hobbes in relation to their study on morals. Both philosophers have their own understanding on the topic of morality in which both perceive ideas in their own way. Kant leans toward more of a rationalistic view of morality, emphasizing the mandatory need to ground the prior principle. Meanwhile, Hobbes has taken more of an empirical view of the fact that we ought to do what we believe in is in relation to self interest but both occur in order to take a subjective point. In other words, they viewed the issue of morality from a person-centered approach.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To Hobbes, it did not matter what realm man was in – public or private, man would be living in solitude. Also, in stark contrast to Aristotle, Hobbes believed that being a human did not necessitate participating in politics since everyone was born equal. Whereas Aristotle was more concerned with people finding ways to contribute to the greater good and realizing their “duties”, someone following a Hobbesian way of life would wonder what they could get from the state, instead of what they could give to…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, Hobbes states that prior to society morals do not exist. Humans in their state of nature are unable to make a moral distinction between good and evil. Good is simply what they desire, and evil is what they want to…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes has been coined for planting the first seed of liberalism, but even though he has been credited for it, it is important to notice the aspects of conservatism found in his philosophy. There are four functions that all ideologies follow, including Hobbes’ Leviathan. The first function is the explanation for a political phenomenon. Since it is known that Hobbes wrote at the time of the English Civil War, it was no surprise that he was trying to explain the reason for the war. Hobbes believed, “that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays