Thomas Hobbes's View Of Nature Shape His Political Theory

Superior Essays
How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up. In Leviathan, Hobbes makes a few key assumptions about human behavior in the natural world – namely that all men are equal, desire for what is best for oneself, and have the right to do all things in the preservation and improvement of life – in the “the state of nature”. Upon this, he builds his subtractive …show more content…
This is the “creature” formed by the following covenant: “I Authorise and give up my Right of Governing my selfe, to this Man, or to this Assembly of men, on this condition, that thou give up thy Right to him, and Authorise all his Actions in like manner.” The ruler can take three forms. It can be a DEMOCRACY, under the rule of all; an ARISTOCRACY, under the rule of a part; or a MONARCHY, under the rule of one. Of these, the superior choice is the MONARCHY, as the monarch’s best interest is the same as the nation, can operate in any manner conducive to running a commonwealth, unfairly rewards fewer people, and have less trouble with succession. The creation of the LEVIATHAN is the last piece of Hobbes’s puzzle of contracts: the way to enforce the fulfillment of the contract. With knowledge of the LEVIATHAN’s absolute power (granted to him by God), the act of following through with the contract becomes more conducive to gain and safety than breaking it could. In that manner, the tragedy of the commons becomes

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Liberty Document Analysis -- AP Government Name: Ryan Cohen Make a copy of this before you type into it. Title of the DOCUMENT 1: Context Who wrote this document? How much do you know about him/her/them? (give a couple of important facts, not EVERYTHING you know!)…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, strongly supporting a sovereign government to control political and social order, debates the evils of man’s free…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The views of Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan are exemplified in his views that obedience is key to human salvation, and that war and violence are merely the cause of the nature of man. The contrasting views on freedom show the difference in philosophy, and the contrasting views of violence and nonviolence show the difference in how to achieve such…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The state of nature ties to his view regarding one’s vulnerability to be subject to harmful actions. One cannot fulfill the security of the first rule without a second derivative law. He writes, “…there can be no security to any man, how strong or wise soever he be…” (560 Landau). Given the nature of men, Hobbes argues that, any one man can’t live in peace in a state of nature (what is sometimes eluded to when he discusses relevant members being at war). An individual may maintain an advantage over another.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes argues that without authority humans would not be able to function as rational beings. He claims that we become enemies with another when they have something that we desire . We have nothing to fear except another’s savage tendencies and what they will do to get what they want; stating that when one person has an advantage everyone else will try to take that away because it causes them distress . He points out that because of this natural human tendency to have competition with one another, if there is no power existing to keep us in control, our natural state would be of war, of constant battle with each other . This is what he calls the state of nature .…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘For Hobbes, the purpose of politics is to escape war. As such, he insists that in order to establish a democratic political order, all individuals need to hand over their will to a single point of ultimate authority’ (Field, 2015). Due to their beliefs on human nature, Hobbes and Machiavelli shared comparable principles with regards to the need of a sovereign ruler, and the requirement for a functioning supreme power in order to control the people. In the enlightenment period in which Hobbes wrote in his book the Leviathan about the human nature of people, he, similarly to Machiavelli, described that they were selfish and war-prone. Hobbes believed that people are not born with the understanding of what was right…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Hobbes perceives human nature to be egocentric and apolitical, Kropotkin perceives a prominent ideology of human nature to be a way for societies to collaborate for the benefit of others. In this paper, I will refute Hobbes’ argument against social preservation by showing that SOMETHING Hobbes’ view on human nature is pessimistically illustrated as “… war of every man against every man …” (page 14). He argues that, in the state of nature, man is selfishly motivated; only interested in promoting their own self-interests by acquiring greater power. Hobbes denotes that the nature of man accommodates violent tendancies, for a constant battle for power and wealth. I find this claim untenable as I believe violence is a nurtured behavior, not…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes, on the other hand, thinks that people only care about power and appetite. We want certain things and we want to get power to get those things. Hobbes’ view is that there is no such thing as responsibility. Moreover, we look at the state of nature. Locke stated that the state of nature is the state of no government; law that obliges everyone and reason.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leviathan Vs Hobbes

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Though the term Leviathan was first introduced as the giant twisted sea monster in ancient myths from the old testament, the English Philosopher Thomas Hobbe however, took the opportunity to named a series of his analytic essays with the same title, referring his concerns over his current state and shared his perspectives on the complex formation and motive behind human nature and illustrated his vision of a perfect world by offering his suggestions on social political orders and his hope for the betterment of a peaceful society. For Hobbe, he believe strongly that disregard the amount of available resources that could be distribute to support one’s survival, men will always act as the power hungry and rational entities that continuously add fuel to the ongoing existing conflict within their own community to fight for self satisfactions. Thus, it is in Hobbe’s opinion that monarchy is the ultimate solution for anarchy, since democracy creates nothing but…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes reduces the state of nature to a list of laws based on the individual’s desire to seek peace, which would conflict with the scenario Hobbes presents. However, one could view the state of nature as an example of collective rationality prescribing individual rationality. In the end, peace may be the goal, but it can only be achieved if others are united in seeking this goal.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, it is necessary to leave the state of nature once established the foundation of human life, that is, there's only independent individuals, it is necessary to build a consistent political society with such budgets. To make this work, Hobbes uses the concept of state of nature. He claims the existence of state of nature that are actually laws to achieve peace. natural law contained very basic and obvious moral precepts, of which no one doubted obligation. Instead, Hobbes conceives rather as technical rules that serve to an end, but not oblige because an obligation has to have some unconditioned…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays