This is the “creature” formed by the following covenant: “I Authorise and give up my Right of Governing my selfe, to this Man, or to this Assembly of men, on this condition, that thou give up thy Right to him, and Authorise all his Actions in like manner.” The ruler can take three forms. It can be a DEMOCRACY, under the rule of all; an ARISTOCRACY, under the rule of a part; or a MONARCHY, under the rule of one. Of these, the superior choice is the MONARCHY, as the monarch’s best interest is the same as the nation, can operate in any manner conducive to running a commonwealth, unfairly rewards fewer people, and have less trouble with succession. The creation of the LEVIATHAN is the last piece of Hobbes’s puzzle of contracts: the way to enforce the fulfillment of the contract. With knowledge of the LEVIATHAN’s absolute power (granted to him by God), the act of following through with the contract becomes more conducive to gain and safety than breaking it could. In that manner, the tragedy of the commons becomes
This is the “creature” formed by the following covenant: “I Authorise and give up my Right of Governing my selfe, to this Man, or to this Assembly of men, on this condition, that thou give up thy Right to him, and Authorise all his Actions in like manner.” The ruler can take three forms. It can be a DEMOCRACY, under the rule of all; an ARISTOCRACY, under the rule of a part; or a MONARCHY, under the rule of one. Of these, the superior choice is the MONARCHY, as the monarch’s best interest is the same as the nation, can operate in any manner conducive to running a commonwealth, unfairly rewards fewer people, and have less trouble with succession. The creation of the LEVIATHAN is the last piece of Hobbes’s puzzle of contracts: the way to enforce the fulfillment of the contract. With knowledge of the LEVIATHAN’s absolute power (granted to him by God), the act of following through with the contract becomes more conducive to gain and safety than breaking it could. In that manner, the tragedy of the commons becomes