Why Is Privacy Greater Than National Security

Improved Essays
Apple believes privacy is greater than the national security needing that information to help stop a extremist. Is privacy greater than national security when the people are under attack by a extremist. National security should have the right to know your information if you have done a crime. It will help the police or FBI track you down and take you to jail. Syed Farcok and his wife have killed 14 people in a mass shooting last December. “His actions have set back the FBI’s efforts to stop the actions of extremist by at least three months” (article 2). If apple would have done what the FBI told them they could have caught them faster instead of being set back. If the national security already had their information they could have stopped the shooting before it happened or made it to where there wasn't as much deaths. …show more content…
However privacy is important but when you have extremist groups out there, do you feel safe and protected. Plus would you rather have the goverment have your information or a hacker or a stalker or a creep with your information. If the government had everyone’s information they can take away a lot of those hackers and creeps and criminals that could harm or kill you. “This refusal is hard to defend when America and it’s Allies are under attack from extremist groups” (article 2). You don't know the struggle the government go through to try to stop a attack before it happens with very little information about a person. I know you're giving up your privacy but would you rather have a bunch of criminals running around or the government deal with them better and be a lot less of them so you can feel

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Article #1: Sinha, G. Alex. " NSA surveillance since 9/11 and the human right to privacy." Loyola Law ReviewWinter 2013: 861+. Academic OneFile. Web.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple Vs Fbi Essay

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue of “Apple V.S The FBI” is should Apple create a program that can break into a terrorist phone. This is an issue because this could solve many terrorist problems but could also compromise the personal info and safety of Apple customers. From the reading “Apple VS The FBI” that “People's phones are a record of their most intimate thoughts and personal information”(Smith 7). This means that people's phones can hold personal information including financial records, friends, addresses, location data, personal photos and more”(Smith 7).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to James Jay Carafano, PhD and Jessica Zuckerman, “ Since 9/11, today the terror attacks have gone up from 19 attacks to 40 attacks” (Carafano Phd and Zuckerman). Given these points, this means that the NSA, FBI, and government aren’t doing a good job with security and should have looked into the terrorists plans before they could be carried out. So the government needs to improve on ways to keep people safe and at the same time to respect their privacy. Many people believe that the government need to step up the security to keep their information safe by the government could easily leak the information or give it to another country. The government need to stop collecting massive amounts of data from some of the 7 billion people on this earth or the people could get all of their money stolen along with stuff that is need for important things such as taxes and things like that.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Post 9/11 Privacy

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Post 9/11 Privacy Prior the terrorist events that took place on September 11 (9/11), privacy was of minimal concern to most people. Of course they were concerned about identity theft and credit scores, but that paled in comparison to the fear that was generated by events on 9/11, which opened the gateway for new levels of privacy encroachments and examination that many are not comfortable with in their day-to-day lives. Ultimately, the argument comes down to whether people are for or against privacy loss in the wake of an ever-increasing terror threat. As Solove (2008) describes it in his article many individuals have chosen to accept an infringement on their privacy rights in order to be secure in the threat to terrorist activities.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Cons

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Terrorists posed as American citizens roam our streets every day, acting like normal Americans while plotting their next attack on our soil. The only way to find and stop these terrorists is to allow the NSA to track emails, phone records, text messages and pictures that travel in and out of the United States. The ethically correct thing to do in this scenario is to let the government track these items in order to ensure our safety in order to solidify our nation from attack and to help put these terrorist behind bars. The Patriot Act gives this power to the NSA and repealing the Patriot act would be detrimental to US safety and security because it would takeaway the government’s power to track these dangerous individuals. Opponents to the…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    9/11 Security Issues

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We live in a society now that is more inter-connected than any other in history. There are cameras in every phone and on every street corner, microphones in all 'smart' devices and a seemingly infectious apathy towards these windows in to our private lives. Post 9/11 saw the world, primarily the United States, crack down on its security by instituting legislation like the Patriot Act, which was a law basically stripping away the basic rights granted to an American citizen if the government deemed you a threat. Now that the innate fear of terrorism has fallen since then, a massive discussion has arisen regarding what information the government can ethically obtain through digital means and what is really ‘too far’ and should not be breached…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Research Paper

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Natural rights, privacy, and security are all superior within the Patriot Act. America, now-a-days, are terrorized by foreigners and out-of-state citizens for the control and power over the United States. By reading the primary source documents and commentary texts, it helped to show how the Patriot Act has a relationship to the Bill of Rights because of the reasoning to find a proper balance between national security and individual rights, explaining how the Patriot Act and privacy goes hand in hand with each other, and trying to find a solution to the debate over the Patriot Act. The Reason to finding a proper balance between national security and individual rights is so that the government doesn’t infringe on American rights. On September…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to research and know how much power the government has under acts such as the USA Patriot Act and what must be done in order to ensure that the rights of private citizens will be protected. Privacy is a large concern for people not only the United States, but also throughout the world. Using terrorism as an excuse to infringe on the privacy and rights of innocent citizens should not be allowed. Without any checks on the government, government agencies would be allowed to go…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Privacy is not an option, and it shouldn't be the price we accept for just getting on the Internet,” stated Gary Kovacs the president of several software companies (Kovacs). However, since the implementation of the Patriot Act in 2001, the loss of American privacy is one of the many results of the new set of revised laws that have been rewritten to give the government more freedom in observing our electronic fingerprint (“Surveillance Under the Patriot Act”). In their hurry to act on the tragedy of 9/11, Congress passed the Act a mere 45 days of the event, with little to no debate. The result of it’s ratification, was a drastic change in the surveillance laws and restrictions of the federal government (“End Mass Surveillance Under the Patriot…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the United Nations, privacy is basic human right that should be protected by law. The United States Constitution also implies a right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment. Recent laws passed by the government have raised questions about whether the government’s actions infringe upon a citizen’s right to privacy. The USA Patriot Act was the first of many laws that increased the powers of government organizations such as the NSA and the FBI. The law allowed these agencies to access private records of US citizens without the need of a warrant or judge’s consent.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Domestic Wiretapping and Surveillance without a court order. Civilized human beings tend to discuss personal private information with each other everyday. Whether they want the information to be known or not by other people is out of their control. People conduct phone calls and texts messages with each other day in and day out. People assume that these are private one-on-one conversations with each other, but little do they know that there is a third party monitoring their conversations.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On June 6th, 2013 The Guardian and the Washington Post revealed the fact that the NSA had access to customer information on Apple, Microsoft, and Google computer products. The information obtained by the NSA was allegedly used to prevent any terrorist actions. However, the NSA has “[built] up a store of information on millions of US citizens, regardless of whether or not they are ‘persons of interest’ to the agency” (Brown). Although terrorist plots are a legitimate threat to America, the U.S government has overstepped its boundaries by violating the citizen’s of America’s fourth amendment right to privacy.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many disputes debating on whether the Patriot Act should be legal or not. The Patriot Act’s purpose is to “[make] it easier for the government to obtain the orders and allowed for greater coordination among intelligence agencies and law enforcement”(Philadelphia, par 14). But at what point is obtaining information from the American citizens too far? The issue for this debate is does the Patriot Act violate the people's rights. This debate has been going on since 2001 as some view the Patriot Act as unconstitutional while others believe it’s protecting the safety of the people.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    National security vs personal privacy has been a hot topic post-9/11. President Obama gave a speech on January 17, 2014 where he stated “in our rush to respond …. , the risk of government overreach – the possibility that we lose some of our core liberties in pursuit of security – also became more pronounced.” (Office of the Press Secretary) Due to the tragic event on September 11th, 2001, our government was placed under extraordinary pressures to find the terrorists and bring them to justice using whatever means possible. This brings around questions regarding ethical dilemmas as they relate to security and our right to privacy.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Fourteenth amendment to US Constitution guarantees the right to privacy along with other fundamental human rights. On the other hand, the Constitution does not review privacy as an explicit human right. The purpose of right to privacy is to protect the privacy of homes, beliefs, the private lives of individuals and their professions. The right defends US citizens from governmental interference into their private lives and ensures confidentiality of personal data. It is also an element of numerous legal traditions that may restrict a government or a private party from carrying out certain actions that threaten the privacy of an individual.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays