Why Is Hiroshima Bombing Wrong

Improved Essays
The Bomb That Changed Everything
August 6, 1945 was a dark day in human history: the day that the United States dropped the first atomic bomb ever used on a civilian population over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. On that day, although sources vary, it is estimated at least 70,000 people were killed as a result of the initial blast. The total casualty count (including the effects of radiation sickness) was upwards of 150,000 according to inicom.com. Three days later, after the Japanese refused surrender, another bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki The effects of these bombs were obviously more catastrophic than any other bombs dropped throughout history, but was this act justified by Japanese vs. American conflict in World War II? Some historians say that these bombings prevented an invasion of Japan that would have cost more lives than the bombs did from both sides, while others argue that the bombings only caused mass-suffering and unnecessary destruction. Although it is possible to know for sure, and as unfortunate and tragic as these events were, I believe
…show more content…
was justified in that they quite possibly saved many more lives than they cost. I am by no means trying to say the bombings were a good thing, but rather a lesser of two evils. It is quite possible that the Japanese would have continued the Pacific War without the bombs, costing millions of lives in the process. The decision to make these attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is possibly one of the most controversial in U.S. history. In times of war, tough decisions must be made. These decisions always have their downsides. The effects of these bombings changed not only Japan, but the course of history, eventually leading to an arms race between the U.S. the Soviet Union. It is not possible to go back and change the decision that was made by President Truman, but what is possible is preventing such a horrific event from ever occurring

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Source C, the Japanese foreign minister, told the ambassador to Moscow that Japan was going to keep fighting as long as the United States was a threat to them. Source D, a pilot who led the attack on Pearl Harbor, spoke to the pilot who dropped the atomic bomb. Fuchida (Japanese pilot) told Tibbets (American pilot) that he “did the right thing” and that Japanese citizens intended to resist invasion “with sticks and stones if necessary.” The last reason that proves we were justified in dropping the bomb is the consequences if we did not. In Source G, a memoir of Henry L. Stimson, Stimson says that if we did not drop the bomb, the war probably would not have ended until “the latter part of 1946, at the earliest.”…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial decisions in American history was Harry S. Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs on Japan during World War II. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima and killed between 70,000 and 80,000 Japanese people. After three days, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki and killed 70,000 people immediately. Radiation from the bombs led to extensive damage as well. The Japanese then chose to surrender on September 2 which marked the end of the great war.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, in response to World War II and Japan’s vicious attacks on the U.S., the United States launched the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the city of Hiroshima, Japan. 80,000 people died, and sixty percent of the city was destroyed. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, in which killed 70,000 people instantaneously and many more in the following weeks. These atomic bombs resulted in pure destruction and chaos for Japan and its people. Although the atomic bombs destroyed part of Japan and took many lives with them, the dropping of the atomic bombs were justified because the U.S. aimed for the complete and utter destruction of Japan and Japan remained a major threat that needed to be eliminated.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with what you are saying. The lives of the Japanese people could have been saved and taken into more consideration. Dropping of the Atomic bomb was preventable, but I think when considering that it was to show power I can see why they did it. That doesn't make it right by any means, we need to consider all sides of situation before taking…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off, if you know nothing about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, then I will give you the history of how it all started, and then maybe you can have an easier time to decide if the US was justified. From the start of the first war in 1939 American scientist, and many of them were refugees from Europe, became highly concerned with nuclear weapons research by the Nazis. In 1940 the U.S. government made the decision to fund its own atomic weapon development program. This program also became the joint responsibility of the Office of Scientific Research and…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Considering the immediate and long- lasting effects of the Atomic Bomb, President Truman and the United States were justified in using the nuclear weapon to force the Japanese to surrender. To illustrate, the USA was justified for using the atomic bomb starting from the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, in which the US fleet were nearly wiped out. Moreover, 1700 people were wounded, 21 ships and 8 battleships were destroyed. Due to the attack from Japan, the USA was no longer an isolationist and now started to fight in the war. The next battle was the Battle at Midway, where the Japanese had been taking island after island between Asia and the US.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my opinion, United States were right on dropping the bombs. Although hundreds of innocent Japanese lives were lost, millions of American and Japanese lives could have been killed. An article on www.militarythistorynow.com before the decision to drop the bombs, there was Operation Downfall. Operation Downfall was the mission where US soldier would storm onto Japanese homeland but never happened. The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tens of thousands were killed in the bombing, naming it inhumane. The bomb’s purpose was not to harm innocent people, its purpose was to first get the Japanese government to surrender, if didn’t surrender then attack cities that help create war material. Innocent lives could have been saved if they evacuated the cities as warned. The dropping of the two atomic bombs saved millions of lives of Americans and the lives of Japaneses. The Japanese government plan was to invade America in a land invasion, causing up to 5 to 10 million casualties of Japanese fighters.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays