Why Is Animal Testing Wrong

Improved Essays
Many examples in the history of medicine not performing the way it is planned is due to the barrier between animals and humans. In the 1950’s an epidemic had hit the United States after an animal tested product was being distributed in stores. These sleeping pills carried a drug that if not moderated can affect the lives of unborn babies. These tests were done on pregnant animals such as rats, guinea pigs, and even cats. With no effects occurring it was pushed to the human trials. Consequently, it was shown that around ten-thousand babies were born with birth defects. This is a clear indication that these tests cannot always be trusted. Another example of unsafety that happened was the drug Vioxx, a drug to help with arthritis an inflammation in the joints. After the animal testing phase twenty-seven thousand heart attacks and many deaths occurred caused by cardiac arrest were caused. These are just two of the many examples brought up when talking about animal …show more content…
Thus, avoiding the truth that animals can feel just as much pain as humans. Animals used in these experiments do not have the cognitive ability to state how they feel, and give verbal consent for the experiment. This causes the suffering of animals and can put their lives in extreme danger. Many on the opposite side of the fight, use the point it is better to use an animal than a human, but what if the roles were switched? This is where the test of morality is really touched upon. Later in her article, Jennifer Klein says, The harm of animals caused by cosmetic and other companies brings us to the adoption of other methods ending the live-animal test and changing the situation to the more safe and morally correct standing (Klein 2012). Therefore, we should be starting a change for the future and limiting animal testing. With less animal testing and more alternatives, the world can focus more on what is right, then what is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Every year, more than 100 million animals are being tested with products to help cure an illness, or are helping to better the life of humans. If these products work, then it is a success, but if they do not work it hurts the animal’s and it puts them in danger. Many may say it is a good thing because the products are being tested before handing them to a human. Animal testing is that it is wrong and dangerous and especially for the safety of medications for human consumption.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some doctors and scientists believe animal testing is not the best method for medical advances for many reasons and examples. In multiple cases, certain drugs have proven effective on animals but are not effective on humans. This occurs most often when testing drugs for stroke. Others include the following examples: a therapeutic dose of aspirin in a human is poisonous, but it has no negative effects to different animals; benzene causes leukemia in humans but not in mice; insulin produces birth defects in humans but not in animals; morphine calms people but excites some animals; chloramphenicol produces aplastic anemia in some humans but saves animals; fenclozic acid causes liver toxicity in people but not in some animals; penicillin is highly poisonous to a few animals but helps humans (Gorman 49).…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any cosmetic or medical companies will tell consumers that their products are the best since it has been tested on animals for safety, but the truth behind animal testing will make buyers think twice about their merchandise. Nowadays, more and more people are teaming up against animal testing. Laboratory testing is done on substances that make up medication and cosmetics, such as perfume, lotion, soap, etc. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, and check the safety of products destined for human use. Substances are injected into animal’s bodies to prove that products are harmless to people, and the environment.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal testing is an inhumane, ineffective method of research. One reason is that these tests do not transition successfully into human trials. There is a low percentile of human diseases that are seen in animals. Over 98% of these illnesses never affect animals. Smoking was originally thought to be non-carcinogenic; this was because the cancer which was caused by smoking was difficult to reproduce in laboratory animals.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, in the 1960 's the drug Thalidomide was put on the market before having been tested on animals. One function of this drug was to cure women from pregnant morning sickness and was known as the "wonder drug. " On the contrary, the drug ended up causing 10,000 newborns to have malformations and missing limbs(Animal Testing and Medicine). This could have possibly been avoided if there were studies on animals taking this drug before it was let out into the public. Biomedical research is rooted into animal testing.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Issue Summery The issue I identified is about inhumane animal research which is wrong because human treat animals as less important than mankind. In the paper, Dylan start paper with questioning about human right verses animal right. Animal research has been done for human’s benefits. Human treat animals as second species, which looks animal lower than human kind.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In discussions of animal testing, one controversial issue has been whether animals can feel emotions as humans do, and furthermore, if they can then is the use of animals in research morally wrong? On the one hand, scientists that use animals as test subjects, such as Helosia Sabin and her late husband, argue that it is crucial for any medical progress because much testing is required before releasing a new drug into the public. On the other hand, people like Peggy Carlson, a scientist herself, and Peter Singer, a philosopher and bioethicist, contend that animal testing is irrelevant since an animal’s genetic makeup differs greatly from a human’s and the practice is unjust since animals suffer. My own view is that Carlson and Singer are correct since animals do have feelings and are capable of suffering similar to the way humans do; therefore, animal testing is cruel as well as unnecessary considering all of the animals used are not biologically similar enough to humans to produce accurate results in research.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate about animal testing being right or wrong has been going on for years now. Although animal testing has improved new medication over the years, as well as it has found the cure for many illnesses, this topic deal with sensitive issues; one of them being, is animal testing morally right? Thanks to animal testing, the wellness, and health of humans have improved significantly, on the other hand, however, by doing the “greater good” innocent animals are being tortured/killed every day. Just like with any other issue we have those in favor and those against animal testing. Those in favor generally follow the scientific findings and medical improvements, and also do not pay attention to the harm being done to these animals.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overall the testing on animals is cruel and unfair it causes them fear, stress, and pain that is forced upon them without consent. It's useless because animal anatomy is different from human anatomy. Most likely the results will not end in a good way in order to help humans with their problems. There are different ways to find the solution to the experiments that scientist are doing and it would lead them to a better outcome. Animals would be able to live safe normal lives if these alternatives were taken into consideration.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unethical Animal Testing

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the subject of animal testing has long been a controversial topic due to its harmful nature over sentient beings, it has been proven many times to be a “necessary evil” in the biomedical industry. As animal testing is performed in many fields for varying purposes, the legitimacy of purpose for inflicting pain on animals and the ethics of the industry is often in question. The practice of animal testing in the biomedical and pharmaceutical fields however, has long been a common practice in developing and improving biotechnology and has had much to show for it in the form of new drugs and new life saving procedures. Furthermore, the safety testing of drugs on animals before marketing (required by the 1938 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) has evidently proved to be a necessary step in preventing tragic incidents such as the “1937 ‘Elixir Sulfanilamide’” incident and the thalidomide accident from the late 1950’s to early 1960’s. These incidents exemplified that the wellbeing of humans were being marginalized when their products were not tested before being marketed.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Wrong

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Despite the claim that animal research has strengthened the world of medicine and technology, relying on inaccurate tests that prove to be questionable solutions for human products is dangerous and is considered flawed science. Some argue that there are benefits yielded from animal testing, such as the vaccine for smallpox, derived “from the cowpox virus used by Edward Jenner... that farm workers who contracted cowpox were protected against smallpox” (BENEFITS). Contrary to popular belief that animals prove to be accurate testing for medical products, the FDA notes that “92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they [do not] work or are dangerous” (Animal Testing is Bad Science). Animal testing does not promise a guarantee of safety and accuracy because all species have different variations. Even…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that animal testing is cruel and does not help with finding cures for human disease, but there are incidents that show that animal testing may be crucial to life. In 1937, a pharmaceutical company in the USA created a preparation sulfanilamide, using diethylene glycol (DEG) as a solvent (Hajar, 2011). The doctors unknowingly gave this medication to hundreds of patients causing mass deaths of humans. This is not the only incident that has caused deaths because there was no testing before giving medications to humans. In the late 1950’s and…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In her research paper titled “Animal Testing and Medicine”, (Hajar 2011) explains that animals have been tested all the way through the history of biomedical research. Although in recent years the practice of animal testing for biomedical research is under severe condemnation by animal rights activists because they are fighting for it to be more humane. (Hajar 2011) As a result laws have been passed in several countries to make the practice more kind and humane. (Hajar 2011) Discussions on the morals of animal testing have been brought up since the seventeenth century.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many countries use animals to examine the safety of drugs, for example, in the U.S. all new drugs have to be tested on animals because the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires so. Since drugs are tested on animals, scientists and pharmacists can insure that these drugs are safe for testing on humans, and then giving it to patients (Fellenze, 2005). However, people are split into two parties for this particular issue, and one party supports using animals, but the other party against using animals in any way, yet using animals is important for humans, but there should be restricted regulations to use them. Animal…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dangers of using animals to test products being made for human uses is a high risk. Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. Billions have been killed in the process. ("Questions and Answers About Biomedical Research.” )…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays