Flaws Of Animal Testing

Improved Essays
Despite the significant medical findings made through animal experiments, there are substantial flaws to animal experimentation as well. First, animal experiments can lead to deceptive results and incorrect conclusions. Animals are different from humans, therefore, they would make substandard test subjects. The anatomy, metabolism, and cellular make-up between animals and people are different making animals abominable models for products that are meant for human use. Animals testing also does not reliably predict results in human beings. Statistically, 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials (AFAAR). With animals being very different from humans, animal experiments can lead to false conclusions. For example, according to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, over 85 HIV vaccines failed in humans after working on animals, and over 100 stroke drugs that were effective when tested on animals have failed in humans. …show more content…
According to Humane Society International, the animals that are used in experiments are regularly subjected to force feeding and inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and/or other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and killed by carbon dioxide poisoning, decapitation, breaking their necks, or other forms of killing (Humane Society International). Animals can suffer like humans do, therefore it’s speciesism to experiment on them while we eschew experimenting on humans. All and any suffering is undesirable, whether it be directed towards humans or towards animals. Animals subjected during animal testing go through pain and suffering at the hands of researchers during testing. These animals are poked, burned, poisoned, and deprived of basic needs, infected with lethal diseases, addicted to drugs and brain damaged all in the name of scientific

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Dbq

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animals can feel pain, have the ability to learn new things, and can have different emotions. This is why animal testing is not okay. Animal experimentation is unnecessary, inhumane, and not accurate. Many different types of animals are used in a variety of experiments and tests.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other than examples of failures resulting from animal testing, there are other reasons doctors and scientists believe it is not effective. One of which being animals and humans have different genetic makeup. This means, because of the different DNA structures, some diseases are difficult to induce in animals since it does not naturally…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With so many other options available animals should not be used or hurt in experiments. Looking at the results of animal testing clearly shows that animals are poor test subjects because of the lack of comparison between them and…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though, it has been proven that results can be misleading and entirely inaccurate, why scientists prefer to test on animals is unimaginable. Researchers have been…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On average, about 26 million animals are taken and used as little test subjects for big corporations to test their possibly harmful, and occasionally lethal, products before they release them to the public's use. This testing on animals began in 500 B.C and many corporations that participate in it see no harm, and have absolutely no intentions of stopping it anytime soon. There are many people that think testing these possibly dangerous products on innocent animals is not a big deal, but this paper will inform the public with some statistics and also give you the writer's perspective on why animal testing is wrong. One thing that is very arguable when talking about whether testing on these creatures should be approved, and continue or…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This shows that not using animals can be just as effective as using animals most of the time. This quote can also go to show that most scientists are open to new ideas and ways of testing the products so things can still change here in the near future. The 92% statistic comes from an earlier report which showed only 8% of those drugs passing animal testing stages would go on successfully to be FDA approved (Understanding Animal Research) Is even just one life worth an 8% chance that a drug will pass and be approved by the FDA? With these other methods of testing the same products the passing rate may be higher or about the same. Either way taking the route of not using animals is best for now and for the long run.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There has been several tests that have gone wrong on humans but they when they tested the drug on the animal it went perfect. Élan Pharmaceuticals created a vaccine to fight Alzheimer, the vaccine worked perfect on mice, the vaccine cured the mice from Alzheimer. They used the same vaccine on humans but the results were different, their central nervous system inflamed (Alzheimer's Vaccine Trials Suspended). It is clear that testing drugs and substances on animals is not safe for humans. Another example to prove that animal testing is not a safe way to test drugs is the process of replacing hormones on women.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ineffectiveness of Animal Testing in the Medical Field Experimenting on animals for knowledge in the scientific field is not something newly developed. Aristotle in 300 BC was known for dissecting animals and then making hypotheses about what he discovered in their anatomy. Even in current modern society, learning is done through animal experimentation and dissection. Almost as if a rite of passage, most students in high school will dissect either a worm or cat to help with their learning process and to develop their skill in the scientific method. Some scientists still believe in using animal testing for new drugs, drugs that are put on the market for the general populace to consume.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thus, avoiding the truth that animals can feel just as much pain as humans. Animals used in these experiments do not have the cognitive ability to state how they feel, and give verbal consent for the experiment. This causes the suffering of animals and can put their lives in extreme danger. Many on the opposite side of the fight, use the point it is better to use an animal than a human, but what if the roles were switched? This is where the test of morality is really touched upon.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is the human act of using lively, conscious animals to test products, not caring what the aftermath may be. According to peta.org, more than 100 million animals are slaughtered in U.S. laboratories. Those that have the heart to inflict this type of brutality do this immobilizing them in restraint devices for hours, drilling holes into their skulls having their spinal cords crushed. (peta.org). Other than the physical atrocities that humans are forcing vulnerable animals into, they are also isolated from their own kind, confined to barren cages, and therefore, become severely traumatized.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to peta.org, in the United States alone, over one hundred million vulnerable animals are inhumanely killed each year during unnecessary scientific experimentations. Testing on innocent and defenseless animals is a revolting act that needs to be terminated. Pain and suffering are the only sensations many of these animals experience during the last moments of their diminutive lives (Garner). Scientists have claimed that any pain that animals feel during experiments are “necessary” for medical advancements, however, inflicting pain on any living organism is unjustifieable (Garner). Important to realize, is that animal testing is an unreliable and wasteful source of research (Animal Aid).…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    considering they were “God’s creation” as some will say (Monamy 10). On the contrary, British Lord Chancellor Francis Bacon thought that animal testing is an excellent way to learn more about our bodies and how it works (Monamy 10). However, this controversy made animal testing rise. An additional amount of scientists started using different types of animals such as monkeys, rats, birds, dogs, cats, and the list goes on and on. With animal testing in use, scientist found out how the digestive, respiratory, nervous, muscular, etc.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Dilemmas

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Current Event Article #2: The Ethics of Animal Testing Volkswagen is currently under a fire because it has come to light that they help fund tests where humans and monkeys inhaled diesel fumes for hours. The nature of the tests is still not known, as the findings have not been made public, however two independent scientists that have conducted air pollution tests on human volunteers told BBC that similar tests on humans are common (Gunter, 2018). The controversial and unethical testing was found to be funded by a lobbyist group, not independent or by government. In these tests, “participants spend up to two hours in a sealed environment chamber breathing diluted diesel fumes equivalent to the levels of air pollution in Beijing or Delhi”…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ("Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons." ) Most tests that look promising fail in human clinical trials. Nine out of ten drugs will fail. Animal studies do not reliably predict human outcomes.…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays