Karl Marx Alienation Of Government Essay

Superior Essays
What sort of government does Marx advocate? What does he claim it will achieve?
Is he right?

This essay will examine the works of Karl Marx, provide an enlightenment on the communist government he advocated and outline key problems of capitalism. Marx’s most significant prognostication was the fall of capitalism; it was designed to be deposed by the proletariat insurgency (Heywood, 1992). The objective of the communist government was to acknowledge labourers with a right to the products of their labour (Kymlicka, 2002). The hypothesis of alienation was very significant importance Marx’s examination of Hegel’s works. The term alienation in Marx’s perspective is the development of material where man produces items from nature, happens to
…show more content…
In a sophisticated rationality, profit that is earned from the sale product is invested to expand capital and subsequently the control of money over the workforce. Therefore, in doing this, the dominance of the workforce diminishes, increasing capital creates a division of labour resulting in the capitalist having more controlling power over the workforce. Hampsher-Monk submits that “since it is the labourer that produces machines in the first place, labour is once again in conflict with its own product” (1992). Moreover, according to Hampsher-Monk, the key practice of alienation is the alienation of productivity. The labourer has to work to be able to live. Marx states that the activity of alienation requires the alienation of …show more content…
Communism as Marx claims, is not merely the disavowal of the bourgeois society but its transcendence in the contradiction of ideas, the continuation of what is traditional and creative value in addition to the effectiveness of authority of the societal and intellectual forms which avoids all men possessing those values since they were expressed in means of private property (Hampsher-Monk, 1992, p. 510). The ownership of private property has shaped people to believe that they only own a product when they have it, used as capital or directly hold, inhabit, eat, drink or wear it (Hampsher-Monk, 1992). The communist type of government is what Marx advocated for and believed

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When reading the article on “Inside Amazon’. Karl Marx was known for his view of capitalism and how it causes alienation. This article really does portray many aspects of alienation. There are four parts to alienation, the estrangement of alienation, alienation of objectification, object of production and a means to produce. but I will focus on alienation from species-beings.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The theory is from a two-fold Marxist sense, which Karl Marx adopted from G.W.F Hegel. In summary, Marx’s theory of alienation states that “in modern industrial production under capitalist conditions workers will inevitably lose control of their lives by losing…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto set a base for Marxist ideology; however, flaws within the ideology itself prevented the implementation of a Communist state from being a realistic goal because among many other factors, Marx overestimated the willingness of individuals to put community needs above their own self-interests. Marx’s theory of Communism appears quite logical on the surface, granted that his assumptions of mankind hold true. The philosophy of Marxism has formed on the basis that men should work “for the benefit” of society, with that acting as their primary motive in life. The foundation for Communism itself quickly crumbles under the falsity of this belief. Marx’s idealist view on human nature simply discounts the truth that men created social divisions in society out of self-interest, an impulse evolved from the core instinct of survival.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx identified two separate phases of communism that, if performed correctly, would overthrow capitalist government. In the first phase, the people of the country would run the government as well as the economy. ----- However, the Soviet Union did not follow this form of ideal communism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto is the first document with systematic and complete presentation of all components of the great teachings of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. It formulates the basic provisions of the materialist understanding of history, the objective laws of development of society, regularities of transition from one mode of production to another. It also describes the history of all existing class societies as the history of class struggles. Both the role and evolution of the bourgeoisie and the proletariat under capitalism are discussed in this book. Overcoming crises by destroying huge amounts of wealth, by a fierce competitive struggle for the conquest of new markets, the bourgeoisie creates a stronger, a more devastating crises.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx thinks ideology as a system of beliefs, presupposition and sentiments which serve the benefits of the creators of the system. With the economic power in hand, the ruling class can shape the social discourses and inject its ideology into the general public. By discussing the historical transitions of ruling classes and their ideologies, Marx argues there is no natural ideology. Therefore the capitalists’ argument that certain behaviors or beliefs under capitalism are natural is implausible. Also, as his analysis shows that capitalism only serves the benefits of capitalists at the expenses of the majority of the population, it is obvious that the capitalistic ideology cannot be beneficial to the majority of the society however the capitalists propagate.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx and Fredrick Engles is a book that has, perhaps, one of the most profound effects on recent human history. This short book has inspired new ways of thinking about government, money relations, family, and even history. Marx and Engles believe that human history can be arranged into three crucial periods. The first being the ancient societies such as the Greeks or Romans, the second is called the feudal societies or the European middle ages, then lastly, as a society we have entered the Capitalist society. The Communist Manifesto is an argument against Capitalism as well as a philosophy on how humans should live their lives and the part government should play in people’s lives.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto expresses a clear message; that capitalism is set-up to fail and that communism is the perfect way to set up a functioning and equal society. A functioning society must have equality for all persons, as well as maintaining a productive economy. In Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, the worker is exploited constantly to increase revenue. Smith states “His(workers) wages are soon reduced to what is barely enough to enable him to bring up a family, or to continue the race of laborers.”.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In all, Marx’s philosophy of the Communist Manifesto is not a guideline to run a country. As observed, if the philosophy is adapted to modern societies then all it can do is fail as a communism, and create massive amounts of corruption and suffering. Marx’s ideology needs to be adapted, and it should be seen as an idea of the past that has ideas that are very beneficial to current economies, but not to be taken…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are other differences between the two political ideologies, the primary and most important difference between communism and the various forms of socialism at the time was that communism acknowledged the anger within the group of proletarians and pressed for a revolution in the group of working class citizens. The two sections also give a brief overview of communist stances on the pressing issues of the time and discusses the struggles that certain countries within Europe were experiencing such as France and Germany and claimed that they were on the verge of a “bourgeois revolution.” The Communist Manifesto ends by calling upon the working class worldwide to begin a revolution against the bourgeoisie. Marx’s ideas about communism have influenced many governments throughout the years but most notably so in the 20th century. Eastern Europe, East Asia and China, and even some parts of Africa all dabbled with Marxism and attempted to form a communist state.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays