Marx's Philosophy: Observable In Communist Russia

Superior Essays
The common thoughts behind Marx’s philosophy is that he desires something like that which is observable in Communist Russia. The current view of the Communist Manifesto is one with great disdain. It is one of the reasons why there have been such notable failures in some large governments. People see the failed “experiment” that was communist China under Mao and the lasting struggle in Russia under Putin. These are all what come to mind when people begin to think of Marx. Marx was not striving towards a “greater society” in which the overbearing equality would lead to an even more powerful caste system. Marx was pushing to destroy the classes, destroy the powerful and create an equal system where there was no worry of capitalism. Marx’s theory …show more content…
The problem with the many societies that have attempted to base their government on Marx’s Communist Manifesto is clear. There is a corrupt backing and there is one key component to Marx’s argument missing. The proletariat classes in any of the given countries has not been strong enough to warrant a majority overthrowing the minority, as they have all been the minority themselves. While many can say that the working person is the one who makes a majority of any country, it would be rather ill informed. The majority of people now are workers, yet they are not “a class of labourers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labour increases capital” (Marx, 18). They are workers for companies, or businesses but not manual laborers who create capital with their work. To base the idea of communism off a worker that does not fit the persecuted group Marx talked about takes all credibility away from the created idea. Workers must be the actual creators in the society and a majority in order for the idea of communism or socialism to work as Marx intended. Without that majority, production would not be equal through all people, and thus rendering Marx’s idea of every individual contributing what their share is obsolete. Communism as the Manifesto has put it is not a modern idea, and does not function well in modern society. Yet, in Marx’s time of …show more content…
Many persecute the believers in the communist doctrine for following, yet it is a result of their misunderstanding. The common thought of the current state of communism in the world is not one that Marx spoke of, and not one that should be seen as beneficial to human life. Moreover, the modern view of Marx’s ideas are more of a socialistic idea that function on the majority not needing to be manual laborers. Bernie Sanders’ idea of democratic socialism is the most realistic contemporary idea that does as Marx wanted; it takes ideas but adapts to benefit the majority instead of the minority. In all, Marx’s philosophy of the Communist Manifesto is not a guideline to run a country. As observed, if the philosophy is adapted to modern societies then all it can do is fail as a communism, and create massive amounts of corruption and suffering. Marx’s ideology needs to be adapted, and it should be seen as an idea of the past that has ideas that are very beneficial to current economies, but not to be taken

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout all of Marx’ works on revolution and the proletariat the main idea is rising up. He is always consistent with the same purpose. There is no confusion to what his motives are. Another common idea is that society and the bourgeoisie would collapse without the proletariat. This idea is the main basis on which the effectiveness of a revolution is built.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This very short essay, from the much longer “Critique of the Gotha Program,” highlights some of the key concepts of Marx’ ideas about the situation society would be in directly following the dissolution of capitalism. This is where the concepts of each according to his ability, to each according to his work, and “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” are formulated. These two concepts lay the foundation for the Marxist transition from capitalism, to a socialist society, and then culminate in the Marxist utopia of Communism. From a…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Communist Manifesto states that she struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie always results in a revolution and eventual “ruin of the contending classes” (1). Marx clearly states that the…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agreeably, the “Communists Manifesto” delivers a clear reflection of the reality instead of the actions of the present-day leftists. For illustration, Marx appreciates that labor is just like any other product and, it fits in rule of demand and supply in a transactional capitalist economic setting. The author states that if the society increases the supply of its labor, the demand for the work reduces as well as the prices or the wages for the effort…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx’s conception of a communist society would be one that is beyond justice in that societal concerns would have been removed, e.g. problems relating to conflicting religious beliefs, and therefore traditional methods of justice would be irrelevant. Justice is to be defined by impartiality and fairness and the methods of justice would therefore be an objective way of ensuring equity within the law and society. Traditionally, legislation and institutions have been erected with those ideals in mind, however there has always been a cloud of despotism that has marred attempts to override socioeconomic disparities. The result has been overarching repression of actions, policies, institutions, and theories which would enable an upheaval of said injustice. However, if the structures that define society are inherently balanced, in this context that would be to say that there is no overt hierarchy that perpetuates oppression and gross fluctuations in standards of living, then that society…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, a person with subpar work skills and poor prospects of earning a decent living based on their education and training will find tremendous appeal in the “to each according to their need” part of the Marxist slogan (Marx). If they need something, that will be provided by the state. Who would not subscribe to this philosophy if they were at the receiving end of such a philosophy’s generosity. Any ideology that proposes to end the injustices of inequality, especially the injustices perceived by the underprivileged, will attract a lot of adherents. However, this argument only serves to explain the appeal of Marxism or communism to the masses, or the so called proletariat.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What sort of government does Marx advocate? What does he claim it will achieve? Is he right? This essay will examine the works of Karl Marx, provide an enlightenment on the communist government he advocated and outline key problems of capitalism. Marx’s most significant prognostication was the fall of capitalism; it was designed to be deposed by the proletariat insurgency (Heywood, 1992).…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays