Difference Between Marxism And Communism

Great Essays
Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society …show more content…
Socialism’ is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. The ultimate aim of a socialist state is the formation of a communist society. The primary difference between socialism and communism is that the former is a dictatorship of the ‘proletariat’ while the latter is a classless society. Hence, there is a state, a political party and a controlled economy in a socialist state whereas a communist state is one where the state completely ‘withers away’ and a classless society is …show more content…
He regarded the modern state executive as, ‘“the committee for managing the common affairs of the bourgeoisie” (Marx 15) Hence, Marx envisioned a stateless society organized in such a way that every member of it can develop and use all his capabilities and powers in complete freedom and without thereby infringing the basic conditions of this society (Marx 37). Marx, however, approves of an intermediary stage between capitalism and communism i.e. Socialism. Marx says, “The development of the masses cannot he ordered by decree. It is determined by the development of the conditions in which these masses live, and therefore proceeds gradually (Marx

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1) What, according to Marx in The Communist Manifesto, must one understand in order to understand the course of historical development? What, in other words, is it that moves history along? The Communist Manifesto opens to the reader by stating, “The history of all hitherto societies has been the history of class struggles”, meaning that there is a perpetual tug-of-war struggle between class status between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat (Marx, 1). Marx states that the bourgeoisie are those who set up the production as “the class of modern capitalists”, whereas the proletariat is the group that works beneath the means of production from the bourgeoisie, “having no means of production of their own” (footnote, 1).…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Early modern writers as diverse as John Locke in his Two Treatises of Government and Karl Marx in Capital attribute inequality to the social dominance of one force such that it eclipses other forces’ abilities to function as they might otherwise; a ‘domination disrupts nature’ thesis. Both Locke and Marx identify money as one such dominating force. This dominance applies not only to money being the end of transaction, but also to the dominance of the means of transaction, with corresponding ramifications for the items being transacted. For example, Locke notes how the accumulation of wealth allows people to store more than they require, leaving relative deprivation in times of scarcity.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socialism Vs Capitalism

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism vs Socialism There are different types of economic systems the countries use to run their governments. Capitalism and Socialism are the most common systems adopted by the governments and generally these systems have been characterized to be the opposite of each other. On one hand, Capitalism is based on the premise that the means of productions or resources, in all of its forms, are owned by individuals, therefore the economy would depend on the profits of those individuals could generate, making this system dependable of the private sector. On the other hand, the Socialism is based on the principle that the sources are owned and controlled by the State or public and the government is in charge to make all the economic decisions…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Autocracy In Russia Essay

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A crisis of modernization was one of the many reasons that caused the collapse of the autocracy in Russia, and the first step to allowing Lenin and the Bolshevik party to eventually gain control of the state. In the 19th century, Russia was one of the largest and most backward states on the European continent. The peasants of the country remained serfs until the mid-1800s, and even when they gained their freedom, they were enslaved to debt and redemption payments to their landlords that they would never be able to pay back. When they gained their freedom and were given small plots of land, the legal ties peasants did have to the states were weakened as nobles enhanced their own rights. This left peasants feeling even more detached from their…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Hemispheres: A Comparison and Contrast of Capitalism and Socialism For the last couple centuries, since the Industrial Revolution the world has been experiencing a tremendous wave of changes in the matters of society, economy and political practices. During this time, two major systems emerged as the result and/or perhaps as a response to the many challenges and opportunities brought by Industrial Revolution. The two hemispheres of power, capitalism and socialism are the two most influential systems that throughout modern history have had an impact the social structures, economic methods and political position of many nations. The importance of analyzing the similarities and differences between both systems present an insight to how…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Comparison of the Development of Absolutism, Nationalism, Socialism, Communism, Totalitarianism, Islamism, and Republicanism Written by: Steven Andrews II Institution: West Georgia Technical Larry McQuiston World History II (HIST 1112)- 20720 Date: November/3/2017 Absolutism is a form of government in which it is based on a monarchy which bares control over the kingdom as well as its population. Absolutism was not an uncommon thing in the eighteenth century, but became prevalent by the French king Louis XIV between 1643 and 1715 (Absolutism, 1998). Rulers and kings have always tried to centralize their powers at the expense of the nobles and the catholic church.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people view socialism as a term synonymous with communism. However, this is not the case; socialism is an economic system in which the state owns all means of production, as opposed to a complete governmental system, communism. Socialism is heavily contested between people with different economic ideologies; the policies chosen for implementation now will greatly affect the future, so people must learn to compromise. U.S.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Research Paper

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I hope this letter finds you well, and you are doing okay. I got your message about wanting to know about the relationship between the market, and the state. I am happy to tell you that I have researched it, and I can now discuss this topic for you. While doing my research for this topic, I came across articles by Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. In short I have learned that the state should have some form of intervention in the markets.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism In America

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the capitalist society of The United States of America the economy is faced with many problems that come along with a society that relies on destroying the competition in order to gain a profit and be successful. This competition can raise problems such as Corporations that control the manufacturing and prices of one product or service. Capitalist Governments have little to no control over how big they can get, and try to regulate this through many laws. However these regulations don‘t always work, and allow corporations to take advantage of loops holes which allows corporations to have to pay less taxes. This problem is not prevalent in Socialist systems of government because of heavier regulations in order to protect the people and not…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have looked now at both socialism and capitalism and how they differ. There are not many similarities between the two except maybe that they both want to run a society in an efficient manner. They just have very different ways of going about it. For a socialist movement to take root in an otherwise capitalistic society the following would have to occur.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism is a form of government not popular in America but is working in other countries. The Merriam- Webster dictionary describes it as a government that controls industries rather than companies and or individual people. (2015, Webster) Socialism politics and economics are a social system in which there is no private property. It is a system in which owned by stat and is a certain stage in-between capitalism and communism. Socialism is not what it used to be if it ever was the evil many believe to be.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is also important for other competitors in this process. In a socialist system, people don’t need to compete for their development because everything belongs to the community; instead of this they compete for political power, which causes much instability in socialist countries. This harms the development of the countries, and it also helps explain why many capitalist countries are secure, such as the United States and Canada. On the other hand, socialism may be viewed as superior to capitalism because it seeks for social justice and promotes education. Socialism, a general term for the political and economic theory, advocates a system of collective or government ownership and management of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All governments are created to maintain a certain degree of order. Some governments allow each citizen an equal opportunity to participate in political outcomes. Other governments restrict the ability of citizens to have any influence over their nation’s rule. Both cases fall within the scale of government types: from oppressive regimes to anarchist factions. Although these types can differ dramatically, the same goal of all governments remains alike.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays