Difference Between Marxism And Communism

Great Essays
Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society …show more content…
Socialism’ is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. The ultimate aim of a socialist state is the formation of a communist society. The primary difference between socialism and communism is that the former is a dictatorship of the ‘proletariat’ while the latter is a classless society. Hence, there is a state, a political party and a controlled economy in a socialist state whereas a communist state is one where the state completely ‘withers away’ and a classless society is …show more content…
He regarded the modern state executive as, ‘“the committee for managing the common affairs of the bourgeoisie” (Marx 15) Hence, Marx envisioned a stateless society organized in such a way that every member of it can develop and use all his capabilities and powers in complete freedom and without thereby infringing the basic conditions of this society (Marx 37). Marx, however, approves of an intermediary stage between capitalism and communism i.e. Socialism. Marx says, “The development of the masses cannot he ordered by decree. It is determined by the development of the conditions in which these masses live, and therefore proceeds gradually (Marx

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Early modern writers as diverse as John Locke in his Two Treatises of Government and Karl Marx in Capital attribute inequality to the social dominance of one force such that it eclipses other forces’ abilities to function as they might otherwise; a ‘domination disrupts nature’ thesis. Both Locke and Marx identify money as one such dominating force. This dominance applies not only to money being the end of transaction, but also to the dominance of the means of transaction, with corresponding ramifications for the items being transacted. For example, Locke notes how the accumulation of wealth allows people to store more than they require, leaving relative deprivation in times of scarcity.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kathleen Lyons History 102-03 Professor Ewing December 21, 2015 Stalinism vs. Marxism and The Communist Manifesto Marxism and Stalinism are two political and economical ideologies founded by Karl Marx and Joseph Stalin, respectively. As defined by Merriman Webster, Marxism is, “A theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society.” Stalinism is defined as, “The theory and practice of communism developed by Stalin from Marxism-Leninism and marked especially by rigid authoritarianism, widespread use of terror and often emphasis on Russian nationalism. " While the ideas of Stalinism was developed from Marxism, Stalinism focused on creating Nationalistic Soviet Union by the use of fear, terror and propaganda, while Marxism focused on eliminating class differences throughout the world.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socialism Vs Capitalism

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism vs Socialism There are different types of economic systems the countries use to run their governments. Capitalism and Socialism are the most common systems adopted by the governments and generally these systems have been characterized to be the opposite of each other. On one hand, Capitalism is based on the premise that the means of productions or resources, in all of its forms, are owned by individuals, therefore the economy would depend on the profits of those individuals could generate, making this system dependable of the private sector. On the other hand, the Socialism is based on the principle that the sources are owned and controlled by the State or public and the government is in charge to make all the economic decisions…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that the process of production and the distribution of the means of life is necessary to be examined to analyze a society and its problems. Marx further related these means of production to class struggle and labor power. Furthermore, Marx believes that the Bourgeoisie class possesses all the means of production and exploits the Proletariat class by making use of the working class labor for their own profits and thus, make their private property. Therefore, Marx proposed the idea of “Communism” under which he depicts this class struggle within the society and promotes the idea of no private property, meaning where all the property is publically owned and everyone works and gets what they deserve on the basis of their ability and needs rather than acquiring it inherently. Furthermore, he was strictly against capitalism and believes it to be inherently unstable.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This main contrast sets a myriad of opposite postures that have a socio-economic and political impact. For example, the capitalist system base individual prosperity on free market with a small government and the opposite, considers government controlled industries as a mean to social prosperity. While in capitalism companies are owned by the private sector; in socialism the government owns the companies. Individual freedom to property, competition and assets management contrasted by elimination of private property and government welfare programs that provide same social benefits. Capitalism can cause huge distance between the classes which can result in social uneasiness, while Socialism systems attempts to assure social equality.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Research Paper

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I hope this letter finds you well, and you are doing okay. I got your message about wanting to know about the relationship between the market, and the state. I am happy to tell you that I have researched it, and I can now discuss this topic for you. While doing my research for this topic, I came across articles by Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. In short I have learned that the state should have some form of intervention in the markets.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is also important for other competitors in this process. In a socialist system, people don’t need to compete for their development because everything belongs to the community; instead of this they compete for political power, which causes much instability in socialist countries. This harms the development of the countries, and it also helps explain why many capitalist countries are secure, such as the United States and Canada. On the other hand, socialism may be viewed as superior to capitalism because it seeks for social justice and promotes education. Socialism, a general term for the political and economic theory, advocates a system of collective or government ownership and management of the means of production and distribution of goods.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have looked now at both socialism and capitalism and how they differ. There are not many similarities between the two except maybe that they both want to run a society in an efficient manner. They just have very different ways of going about it. For a socialist movement to take root in an otherwise capitalistic society the following would have to occur.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people view socialism as a term synonymous with communism. However, this is not the case; socialism is an economic system in which the state owns all means of production, as opposed to a complete governmental system, communism. Socialism is heavily contested between people with different economic ideologies; the policies chosen for implementation now will greatly affect the future, so people must learn to compromise. U.S.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism In America

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Merriam Webster the definition of socialism is, “a way of organizing a society in which major industries are owned and controlled by the government rather than by individual people and companies” (Merriam-Webster). In The United States of America the words “Communism” and “Socialism” are used interchangeably, and although they have similarities they are very different systems. Socialism involves more government involvement in order to regulate the economy and government to help the people more and to allow the socioeconomic system to lead more to the people and help lessen the societal classes. Socialism addresses many of the problems that affect capitalism such as multi billion dollar companies controlling or taking over one industry, and forcing competition to be defeated and crushed in order to be the richest and most powerful corporation. In…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socialism is a form of government not popular in America but is working in other countries. The Merriam- Webster dictionary describes it as a government that controls industries rather than companies and or individual people. (2015, Webster) Socialism politics and economics are a social system in which there is no private property. It is a system in which owned by stat and is a certain stage in-between capitalism and communism. Socialism is not what it used to be if it ever was the evil many believe to be.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysing and comparing the positive and negative aspects of the theory as well considering its continuing relevance within modern society allows me to develop a greater understanding of how Marxism approaches International Relations. From my analysis throughout previous paragraphs it is clear that this approach has both significant strengths and weaknesses. Marx theory of class can be effectively and accurately applied to International Relations as a means of examining the ways in which class struggle is present within states and how this conflict affects relations between key actors within the International System. Although this aspect of analysis is strong, components of the Marxist approach of International Relations remain flawed, Marx pertains a predominantly economic focus towards International Relations often attracting criticism concerning how this approach leaves little regard for other aspects of analysis. This weakness is of genuine concern, as it is important to maintain a holistic view of the ways in which additional factors may affect international relations.…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays