Communist Manifesto Critical Analysis

Improved Essays
In 1848, Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels published ‘The Communist Manifesto’ that was aimed at presenting the arguments, goals, and platform of Communism. The publication was a commissioned work that was intended to articulate the objective and platform of the Communist League, an international political party founded in 1847 in London, England. The authors point out the benefits of communism and the need for its application in the future. Besides, the manifesto was a proposal reading stabilization of the class structure in the society without conflict. The authors argue that historical developments have been impacted by the class struggles, with the rich battling with the poor and the exploitation of one class by another. They propose that with …show more content…
In the first preamble of the manifesto; ‘Bourgeois and Proletarians’, the authors explain the capitalist mode of production that is associated with conflicts between classes. The Bourgeois exploit and oppress the proletariat through competition and private ownership of property, including land. However, the capitalist mode of production becomes incompatible with the exploitative and oppressive relationship, contributing to the proletariat leading a revolution. On the contrary, the revolution will be different from the previous class relationships in that the new ruling class will not be driven towards reallocation of property. Instead, the new ruling class, the proletariat, when in control, will abolish the ownership of private property and the classes will disappear (Marx & Engels, 1848). Marx and Engels (1848) state the resulting conflict and revolution can be solved through the adoption of Communism, whereby there are no class distinctions in the society. In the second preamble; ‘Proletarians and Communists’, Marx and Engels explores the relationship between the communism and the working class. They state that the Communism would be organized in favor of the proletariat and focus on their interests rather than those of a specific class (Marx & Engels, 1848). They expound on the characteristics of the Communist …show more content…
Although the present society has not changed much with the crisis of working class still prevalent, the ideas of the manifesto still make sense to the contemporary society. The working class in the present society is different from that existing in 1848. Globally the working class has become more organized and more substantial than before. For intake, in 2013, China recorded an increase of more than 29 million industrial workers, and in the U.S the labor force was at 155 million. Although the working class has changed some of the observations of the Communist Manifesto apply to the workers that rely on the wages to pay bills and make a living. Additionally, the Communist Manifesto is relevant in China today, which has adopted a communist platform. In 2007, the Republic of China adopted the National People’s Congress that allowed creation, transfer, and ownership of property. The entrepreneurs in China have a right to own private property and conduct private businesses. Nonetheless, the communism culture has not been fully adopted since the platform has faced resistance from most of the citizens (Wasserstrom,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In what ways did the Industrial Age influence Karl Marx 's writing of the Communist Manifesto? “The Communist Manifesto” by Karl Mark and Frederic Engels was published 150 years ago in London in February of 1848 and is widely is regarded as one of the most influential and widely-read documents of the past two centuries. The main focal point of this essay is to target the major influences that the industrial age had on Marx’s writing of this documentation and how it affected its end product. This will be addressed by answering questions such as why it was written, what the manifesto consists of, any major influences that dictated its content and how it has helped shape our society today.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The new dominance of the bourgeoisie created a social class within the bourgeoisie, and thus the proletariat emerged (4-5). These “wage-laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live” (1). The creation of the proletariat was a necessary affect to bourgeoisie’s approaches of production- a superiority complex and divide for struggle naturally came about between the owners of the production and the working force (6). The bourgeois industries expanded and increased their own capital, leaving the lower class unable to compete; Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time” (6). This dissonance eventually caused corrosion within the structure of the proletariat, and this struggle created the revolutionary element which eventually destroyed the bourgeois oppressors: “What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own grave-diggers.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, the Communists have come together to write the Communist Manifesto, so that their thoughts and theories can be published for the public. The first section of the Communist Manifesto introduces many important ideas. One of the main topics in this sections is Marx’s thoughts…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mccarthyism Vs Marxism

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Communist Manifesto Marx explained the historical class struggles that each society has come across since the beginning of time. Class resemblances are usually, the oppressor and the oppressed on opposite sides and classes with various orders of complicated arrangements (p.15). Marx’s believed that his society has not left the class antagonism from earlier times such as the Ancient Roman’s, however, enforced new classes with new conditions and struggles for the oppressed individuals, in place of the old policies (p.15). In Communist Manifesto Marx noted the two classes of his society were the bourgeoisie and proletariats (p.16). Quite simply, the bourgeoisie were the capitalists who were the enforcers and owners of the properties in…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They state “Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps - the bourgeoisie [and the working class]”. (Marx,The communist Manifesto) They use the ever growing divide between classes as fuel to promote their ideas on socialism and give 10 goals for the communist party; The Communist Manifesto insighted change, and…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1848, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published the Communist Manifesto, which called for a classless, stateless society, governed by utopian principles. The type of ideology Marx and Engels were describing was communism. The Communist Manifesto emphasized the importance of class struggle in every historical society, and the dangerous instability capitalism created. Engels and Marx believed that the nation had to go through a series of revolutions in order to reach communism, socialism being one of these stages. In a communistic government, the “government owns the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) and there is no privately owned property.”…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part A: Boyer’s (1998) article argues that the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx is only relevant within the historical context of the 1840s, and not in any other decade of the 19th century. Boyer (1998) then agues that the primary thesis of this argument is that Marx wrote this document during the “hungry” 1840s, which defines a unique period of economic collapse as a timeframe in which communism was an increasingly common idea in the development of European political ideologies (151). More so, the thesis of Boyer’s (1998) article seeks to defame the Communist Manifesto by showing its relationship to the severe economic events of the 1840s, as well as defining how this type of economic collapse was the only time in European history in which…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Communist Manifesto was a report that made legitimate the entire speculation behind the lifestyle of communism and also the goals that these sorts of overseeing propose to accomplish as time goes on. The affirmation faced off regarding the conclusion between the various classes of society that incite the uprising improvement of the business and production of stock of the economy. Before long associations between the classes wound up noticeably nonexistent; it was by then another class ascend and assumed control. This proclamation has its individual explanation. Among them was the disagreement that free endeavor was flimsy and can't get a handle on these progressions.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Manifesto of the Communist Party and The Working Man’s Programme are two readings in the book The Communist Manifesto that can be compared and contrasted on their issues during that time frame. The main issue with The Manifesto of the Communist Party, written by Marx and Engel, is about class antagonism or class struggles. Class was arranged into complicated class structures during this time in the world. Examples of different class structures during the medieval times were feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices and serfs. The medieval societies could not provide for increasing markets, so the manufacturing middle class, the Bourgeoisie, took its place.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto is one of the most influential political manuscripts. It was commissioned by the Communist League and written by communist theorists Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. It is a written document which directly states the goals of the communist party. According to Marx, the history of an existing society is based on the history of class struggle.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One might question why the Communist Manifesto is relevant today and whether or not it applies to society as we know it. It is easy to get caught up in the distinction of two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, as being the primary make-up of society. While this might have been true in the…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx believes that the working class will overthrow the ruling capitalist class. During the Industrial Revolution in England, the two classes that become defined is the bourgeoisie, which are considered middle class and the proletariat, which are the working class. The modern industry and large capitalists took over small businesses owners, and these groups of people become part of the working class. The proletariat class is large in size compared to the bourgeoisie therefore; wages decrease for manual labor workers while profits increase for capitalist. He believed that the influence of the capitalist extended beyond where the good is produced and into many countries because this is the only way for them to increase their profits.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was written by German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the 1840’s. It was written during the time period of massive revolutions across Europe. However, its influence would further shape the social and political landscape of Europe during the twentieth century. The Communist Manifesto provided an analytical perspective of the struggle of classism and the problems associated with capitalism. Marx and Engels indicated that at some point in time the communist regime would be replaced by a socialist form of governance.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The communist manifesto was a revolutionary one-sided propaganda tool that disseminated the information seeking to influence the opinion of the public. Published by Friedrich Engels Pages and Karl Max, the manifesto is romantic, persuasive, and offer insightful explanations of a progressive society. More so, the article offers incredible explanation of a progressive society rather than analytical condemnation of rampant capitalism. The persuasive presentation of arguments by Marx and Engels elicit sharp reaction for a section of society that questions the merit of composition of the current society. Marx and Engel sought to unite the proletarians and advocating for need to take actions.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays