What Is The Problem Of Criteric Chisholm Summary

Improved Essays
The problem of Criterion is a problem posed by Roderick Chisholm and is a foundation problem of epistemology. The problem of Criterion is indeed a problem for the very beginning of knowledge. It’s the beginning of our process of trying to find knowledge. Chisholm claims that we can either answer the question “what do we know?” or “what are the criteria of knowledge?” but we are unable to answer both of them. Basically, if we answer the question “what do we know?” first, then we are going to be arbitrarily deciding what we do know and what we don't know without good criterion for separating them. However, if we answer the other question, “what are the criteria of knowledge?” first, then we are going to be coming up with an arbitrary criterion for separating knowledge without having specific examples …show more content…
To make this more concrete, Chisholm provided us an example of distinguish good apples and bad apples. To separate the apples, we could take a particular sample that we have already been told some of the apples are good and some are bad, and based on this particular sample, we could develop a criterion for determining which apples are good and which apples are bad. This would be a particularism solution; we could then apply the criterion into a larger set and be able to divide the apples. We could also be given a method or criterion, the apple is good “if and only if”, this would be a Methodist solution and based on this criterion we are able to separate the apples. What this leaves us with is if we are given particular cases we can devise a method and given a method we can devise particular cases. However, if we are given neither, there is no way for us to

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Determinism is a philosophical idea that attempts to place all events that occur as inevitable as they are predetermined by previous events and the laws of nature. However there are many who came to be known as indeterminists who reject the notion that free will is absent from the process that causes events to occur. Indeterminists believe that there are possible events that have different probabilities of occurring based on human beings free will. Then Chisholm’s view of the agent-casual theory presents humans as always going through a decision process when making an action that leads up to an event they work through their desires in first and second order volitions and then they act. These actions are free from previous events and cannot…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowledge cannot be obtained, we can only convince other of our claims. The text is a Postmodernistic type of epistemology because the author uses rhetoric to…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument from ignorance presents difficulties that simply place into question one’s confidence when answering a vague question. Wolgast and Stroud demonstrate the improper context and meaning of the argument, in which we are forced to provide an answer. However, if the answer provided has any correlation with our knowledge obtained through the senses, then it is not a satisfiable answer. Similar to the example that Stroud’s example, if one attempts to provide an answer by using a method (e.g. a test tube)—assuming that knowledge is a necessary condition—then such proof would…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sense Certainty Analysis

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What does sense-certainty fail in achieving, and what does this failure mean for epistemology? 2000. December 9th. Sense-certainty is Hegel 's approach to proving that knowledge of the world is not a wholly passive process, he does this through a dialectic from, meaning that the argument moves as a conversation, with hegel presenting an answer to a question, in this case how one can know about the world through consciousness, and then works to show how the answer is wrong in itself, because it holds inconsistencies. This essay will be read as in two parts, first i shall discuss how sense-certainty fails, and then will approach the question of what that means for epistemology.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to judge and evaluate theories for validity, especially in relation to one another. This will help increase the credibility of the theory. Although a theory cannot be proven right or wrong, it can become more believable after being judged by certain criteria. Theories should be independent of one another, absent any influence from any other theory that has yet to be proven. If two theories are evaluated simultaneously, the data would be considered flawed.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ancient definition knowledge is clear a true justified belief. In that definition it seems that justification is a big part of knowing something and it makes sense. When something is true it shouldn’t contradict itself and it should have some justification right? G.E Moore says he certainly knows that the earth existed before he was born, but doesn’t really justify it. Thinking about this statement it is something that most people see as obvious.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meno Vs Socrates

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophy: The Pursuit of Truth, in the Company of Nous Socrates, as presented in many works of Plato, makes inquiries about the garnering of knowledge and truth. In the platonic dialogue, Meno, Socrates attempts to answer Meno’s paradox: if you don’t know what you are looking for, how can it be found? Meno’s question allows for the assertion that inquiry is impossible, for how do we know what to ask, if we don’t know, or have knowledge about, what we are asking. This perplexity brings up the illusion of the enigmatic source of this knowledge. Where does knowledge originate from, what allows for the commencement of inquiry?…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the only aspect of life, a person, can know for sure is that they are a thinking being. Any other sense data can be argued as devised. This paper will defend Descartes views and show that almost anything can be questioned. In 1619, Descartes decided to throw out all the knowledge he perceived with his senses.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gettier problem, in the field of epistemology, is a landmark philosophical problem with our understanding of knowledge. Attributed to American philosopher Edmund Gettier, The Gettier Problem challenged the long-held notion that justified true belief was knowledge. In the account of JTB, to have a proposition show knowledge one must have met all 3 conditions (Justification, truth, and belief). The Gettier Problem challenged this with two counter examples showing that some have justified true belief and do not know it, proving the JTB argument to be inadequate. Some have rejected these “Gettier Cases” while some have sought to transition from JTB to the Gettier Problem outlook.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meno asks Socrates why knowledge is prized far more than true opinion. To answer this, Socrates tells Meno that true opinion becomes knowledge through thought and recollection of what is true. Thus, true opinion is an unjustified belief while knowledge is a justified belief. So knowledge, in being justified, is more valuable than opinion. But what makes knowledge justified and what is justification?…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carnap senses that only experience can tell us the knowledge imbedded in the world of phenomena (as described by Kant). In order to access the truth of this world, Carnap came up with a criteria of theory choice and demarcation which is required to evaluate competing scientific theories and deduct the ones that are better or worse. Here, Carnap introduced verificationism, to see if a principle is scientific or not. A theory is scientific if it is…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogue of Theaetetus, written by the Greek philosopher Plato, discusses the idea of knowledge with the help of Socrates, Theaetetus and Theodorus. The question of What is Knowledge, is proposed by Socrates, who then aids Theaetetus in making this discovery. Theaetetus comes up with three possible hypotheses, one after another that are as follows: (I) Knowledge is perception, (II) knowledge is true judgement, and (III) knowledge is true judgement with logos. While Socrates helps in the discovery of theses hypotheses, he soon after sets out to challenge Theaetetus on his thinking and logic. As the teacher, Socrates goal in invoking the rejection of each of these statements is to guide Theaetetus to better clarity of the question, as well…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Math Of Love Analysis

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Can love be researched? And if so, how on earth is it done? Well, Dr. Fry displays a very informative presentation on “The Mathematics of Love,” shown on the popular conference series, TED. She dives into the process on how to find the ideal partner, knowing when is the right age to marry, and how to stay in a relationship. While her lecture is interesting and worth looking into, it is also important to understand is how she incorporates the ways of knowing into her research.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays