Essay On Ethics And Morality

Improved Essays
As I was researching ethics for this essay, I realized that there is a significant distinction between ethics and morality. These were two things that I had considered one and the same. However, ethics is “the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation” (Merriam-Webster.com, n.d.). Morality is “conformity to ideals of right human conduct” (Merrian-Webster.com, n.d.). Utilizing the word conformity to define morality seems to present an opposition to ethics, in that what is accepted as the norm is not always ethically right. As Leo Tolstoy stated, wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it. We often conform to the ideals and actions of the majority as part of a deep human need to be accepted by society. Ethics, differing from morality, allows for the consideration of diverse perspectives beyond societal norms. By not allowing for the consideration of diverse perspectives, societal conformity can conflict with ethics. …show more content…
As a high school teacher for the past seven years, one training on how to connect with our students stands out. The instructor asked us to consider the meaning of fairness. Is fairness the act of offering a Band-Aid to every student that has an injury? They’d all receive the exact same thing. Would it still be a fair policy if one student had a paper cut and the other student had a broken arm? The paper cut and broken arm are symbolic of the way students enter our classrooms. Every students enters class with a deficit of knowledge and ability, but some students enter with a much bigger deficit than others. Yet, schools operate on set rules and policies. Is it ethical and fair to alter certain rules and policies depending on circumstances? In effect, we have to consider the ethical question of how standards and policies should apply to each

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In James Rachel’s book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy Rachel argues that there are some major problems with the logic that Cultural Relativism is based on. In this paper I am going to argue against Moral Disagreement in which I will merge Cultural Relativism with subjectivism. CR states that the view rightness/wrongness and goodness/badness are culturally determined. What the majority of one’s culture decides is right or wrong. With that definition I would be sure this is true, but some people disagree with this.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They acknowledge that there rules of thumbs, but sometimes absolute obedience to the rules don’t apply all the time. In addition, there can be conflict at times. Moral understanding and moral wisdom are needed to deal with particular situations. According to virtue ethics, this can only be gained through training, experience, and practice. This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Devlin and Dworkin agree that not every individual is capable of giving consent and there should be restrictions of what individuals are capable of such, this would allow legal intervention in some of the acts Devlin considers immoral. Public morality is something that comes from justification not from a reasonable man making decisions for society as a whole. Although if a society has an overwhelming opposition to an act that Dworkin would deem as justificatory then there should be a right to overturn such act otherwise it could potentially be more harmful to society than prohibiting…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It differs in that ethics is the philosophical and scientific study of the moral and theoretical while morality is practical. Ethics is about right and depends on the philosophy and moral change is the behavior that is our life. Etymologically "ethical" and "moral" have the same meaning. "Moral" comes from Latin "mos" which means habit or custom; and "ethics" from the Greek "ethos" which means the same. But now they have come to mean different things and refer to areas or different levels.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subjectivity Of Morality

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The morality of every decision and action is objective. If morals are objective then as a society we may look back at certain actions and assess their morality. Just because an action or decision was agreed upon in the past or by certain parties as morally acceptable, it does not make those actions morally acceptable when we reflect up those times. That is why people and societies progress and reform in order to stray away from immoral actions. This contradicts the assessment made by J.L.…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Normative theories of ethics are meant to assist in the discovery of what is right and wrong. These moral theories rely on principles that determine whether an action is right or wrong. Some normative theories include utilitarianism, virtue ethics, W.D. Ross’s intuitonism, the categorical imperative, or deontology. Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues ethical objectivism with two arguments which are the argument of relativity and the argument of queerness. I will argue that ethical objectivism’s argument that there are some moral standards that are impartially correct and some moral assertions that are true is false because, Mackie’s argument of relativity shows that people do not approve of something because they believe it but simply because they live it, it is also false because Mackie’s argument…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay Concerning the Subjectivity of Morality The debate of whether morality is subjective or objective has been hotly debated for many centuries since humans often base their actions off of their personal values. Are these personal values inherent across all of mankind? Those who take the side of moral objectivism would say that this statement is true and that we share a deeply rooted ethical code no matter our background. However, moral subjectivists, such as Mackie, would disagree with this statement on the grounds that moral judgements are simply “equivalent to reports of the speaker’s own feeling or attitudes” (Mackie, 779). Mackie uses several theories in his writing to at least to counter the belief of objective morals by using Cultural…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This cannot be the other way around for example a difference in moral concepts is the practice of monogamy. After it is well established that the behavior is appropriate it would become really hard to challenge the norm if that is approved. If we accept this then instead of moral values being objective we accept them as a consequence of a social framework. Mackie’s attack on objective moral values ends rapidly. In some cases cultures adopt a moral code that violates most of the ideas of morality.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays