What Is Paul Johnson Drywall Inc.'s Workplace Discrimination?

Improved Essays
Federal law prohibits workplace discrimination and enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Those laws are passed by congress and signed by the president. U.S. Labor Department investigation of Paul Johnson Drywall Inc. aggress to pay $600,000 in back wages, damages and penalties. Paul Johnson Drywall Inc. classified their workers as member/owner instead of employees, which denied them of basic worker protection provided to employees (Department of Labor, (DOL) 2014).
In 2013, Paul Johnson Drywall Inc. signed a contract with Arizona Tract for providing drywall labor. The Department of Labor filed a consent judgment in the U.S. District court for the District of Arizona, in reference to Paul Johnson Drywall Inc. has decided to assume full measurements to guarantee that miscommunication of its workers does not happen again and agreed to pay $556,000 in overtime back wages and that no more damages to 445 former and current employees. The company agreed to pay $44,000 in penalties (DOL, 2014).
…show more content…
David Weil the administration for the wage and hour division this reveals their assurance to eliminating wrongful oppositions and pay policies, that results in employees not receive their right pay for ethical hard work. The department of wages and hour division in Phoenix was investigating construction contractors and investigators they discovered the drywall contractors violated the Fair Labor Standards Acts (FLSA) overtime and booking-keeping requirements. Individuals working in residential construction this would show positive change, in Arizona. Paul Johnson Drywall is a leader in the business, the investigators are glad to see that the company has taken an open stand toward the corrections of misclassifying, which deny susceptible employees of their wages, their rights, benefits, employee status and take away taxpayers of the payroll taxes. When misclassification occurs, everybody loses except the employer that misclassified (DOL,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Over 3000 workers claimed that they were paid only for the time they were at their work stations and the production line was moving. c. The employee argued that the company violated the Employment Standards Act of 1938 and Iowa Wage Payment Collection law by not…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MACHTINGER v. HOJ INDUSTRIES LTD., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 986 Facts: The appellants, Machtinger and Lefebvre, were employed by HOJ Industries Ltd. from 1978 until their discharge without cause in 1985. Both appellants signed employment contracts for an indefinite period. Machtinger’s contract contained a clause which allowed the respondent to terminate his employment without cause and without notice. Lefebvre’s contract contained a clause which allowed the respondent to terminate his employment with two weeks’ notice.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ARGUMENT I. THE PETITIONER, IN THIS CASE, WAS AN EMPLOYEE OF PLUS BUILDING, INC., AND NOT AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Respondent claims that Petitioner Mr. Kroplewski was not an employee of Plus Building, Inc., but an independent contractor. Although there is no rigid rule of law to determine whether an employer-employee relationship exists between parties, such determination depends on the particular facts of the case. The range of factors is considered in making that determination including the right to control the manner in which the work is done, the method of payment, the right to discharge, the skill required, and who provided the materials, tools, and equipment.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Facts of the Case In Mitchell v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Co. the petitioner proposed a case against Abercrombie & Fitch stating that the defendant has violated both the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act. The plaintiff, Melissa Mitchell, has decided to pursue a lawsuit on behalf of herself as well as other affected members. The specific violations that arise from these two acts stem from Abercrombie & Fitch’s negligence with regards to paying Managers-in-Training and Assistant Managers the proper raised compensation of overtime pay (428 F.Supp.2d 725 (2006)).…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wal-Mart has been recognized as one of the most unethical companies of this generation, the company has been getting away with multiple unethical and illegal acts for many years now. In 2010, Walmart was considered the world’s largest employer (Sethi, 2013). Some of the few unethical and illegal acts they have been accused of is, fraud, acts of bribery, corruption and mistreatment of employees with their powerful market status. Wal-mart has also been recognized one of the worst companies to work for as they have been accused on multiple occasions of underpaying their overtime workers, withholding alleged health benefits, mistreatment of employees and so on, because of which, the company has been sued on many occasions by its employees. As it’s…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logan tells her boss, Diego, told her and five other women that they were his top employees, but none of them would be offered promotional opportunities with the company. When asked for an explanation, Diego told them that some of his traditional clients told him they would refuse to work with women, and if any of those clients decided to take their work to another vendor, he would suffer a significant economic loss. Issues 1. Could the client sue the company for sexual discrimination. 2.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co. was a Supreme Court case in which a janitor complained that African Americans were kept into low-paying positions. Griggs claimed that Duke's policy discriminated against African-American employees in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Supreme Court ruled against Duke Power; It held that Title VII “proscribes not only overt discrimination but also practices that are fair in form, but discriminatory in operation.” The case is significant because the court concluded that the subtle, illegal, purpose of these requirements like standardized testing and a high school education was to safeguard Duke's long-standing policy of giving job preferences to its white employees. African Americans were limited…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Garcia v. City of Antonio The issue on whether compensation and overtime pay is applicable to excluded and non-excluded security personnel is a major issue across various states. Even though the Fair Labor Standards Act provides direction regarding this issue, it remains to be a major concern that has attracted huge attention throughout various states. The U.S. Supreme Court and Congress have been forced to make several landmark decisions regarding whether compensation and overtime pay is relevant to exempt and nonexempt security workers.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Republican national convention was taking place in Dallas in 1984 where Gregory Lee Johnston participated in a political demonstration of which an american flag was burned as a sign of symbolic language. He was then charged on a Texas criminal statute that forbids the desecration of venerated objects that included but not excluded to monuments,places of worship or burial, or a state or national flag “in a way that would offend one or more persons likely to observe or discover his action”. This lead to him being convicted and sentenced to a year's time in prison along with a fine of two thousand dollars. However, this was not the ned as he appealed this case to the supreme court as he felt that it was well with his rights to burn a flag as the first amendment protects him.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Uniform Commercial Code

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Question 1: How does the Uniform Commercial Code define "merchant"? Why does the UCC distinguish between merchants and non-merchants? (2.5 points) Answer: As indicated by UCC "Trader" implies a man who bargains in merchandise of the kind or generally by his occupation holds himself out as having learning or expertise impossible to miss to the practices or products included in the exchange or to whom such information or ability may be credited by his business of a specialists or dealer or other go-between who by his occupation holds himself out as having such learning or aptitude. No.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S. Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002), Mr. Castro was fired for his organizing activities, which he was unlawfully terminated (“Undocumented Workers”., n.d.). “The National Labor Relations Board, the agency that administers the NLRA, ordered the employer to cease and desist, to post a notice that it had violated the law and to reinstate Mr. Castro, and to provide him with back pay for the time he was not working because he had been illegally fired (“Undocumented Workers”. , n.d., p. 5.) .”…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout time laws have come and gone. Many different generations have seen acts that were once considered criminal turn legal, and vice versa. One law that has fluctuated in consistency and rule since 1938 is the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is in place to protect workers and is regulated by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). The FLSA encompasses several aspects of the work force that require regulation, including child labor, minimum wage, and overtime pay (Cheeseman, 454).…

    • 2086 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics have a major impact in the way companies hire and fire employees. Today, more than ever, companies are susceptible to lawsuits for a myriad of reasons from wrongful termination to policy violation to violating equal employment rights. Many of these organizations spend years entangled in the legal system and accumulate thousands of dollars in legal fees. More often than not, many are bankrupt as a result while others downsize and pay out millions to victims.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of EEOC Vs. Federal Express

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Federal Express (1995). A courier was harassed by a customer on her route. The customer made such comments as saying she looked better without any clothes on and repeatedly asked her out on dates. She brought this issue up with her supervisor who wrote to the customer asking him to refrain from ? any future conduct that could be perceived as offensive or intimidating?.…

    • 2298 Words
    • 10 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction This documentation will discuss employers accommodating religious beliefs. The fact that employers must respect their employees and applicants religious practices in accordance with Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. What the definition of religion by the law. Ways both parties must compromise of religious practices, both the employer and employee.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays