Thomas Nagel What Does It All Mean Summary

Superior Essays
“What does it all mean?”. Thomas Nagel writes of different philosophical questions in which humans want or crave answers for. Throughout this book you will see how Nagel sates his personal opinions and leaves essential questions open for the reader to form or create their own opinions forcing them to think for himself or herself. Nagel thinks that the best way to study philosophy is to think about the questions openly, initiating us to entertain many other solutions. In Thomas Nagel’s book “What does it all mean?”, the author positions his opinions and leaves many questions open for discussion causing our curiosity and self-formed opinions to debut.
Perception
Throughout chapter two, Nagel introduces many different perceptions of reality.
…show more content…
8) which clearly states his skeptic view on his question. He supports this claim by writing “Everything else is farther away from you than your inner experiences and thoughts, and reaches you only through them”. This proves that your experiences are emotion and impression based.
Nagel then jumps into the notion of solipsism. Solipsism is the view that “your mind is the only thing that exists” (pg. 11). He immediately broadcasts his position on not being a solipsist and continues with an example of writing this book. His example claimed that there would not be anybody to read the book due to the thought of only our mind existing. Solipsism is a dream that one cannot wake up from or a hallucination with nobody to contradict it.
The next view Nagel speaks on is skepticism on the external world. He indicates that the only certain thing we know is not knowing anything. For a lack of better words, skepticism can be described as an “I don’t know” approach. He explains that our minds are the only real thing that exists or that we don’t even know if there is a world that exists external to our own minds. Nagel suggests that you can even be unsure of your past because you would have to resort back to your mind and would be stuck in a constant loop. This is because you are basing your knowledge on your past existences which Nagel argues that you can still be uncertain about because you don’t know
…show more content…
Verificationism is the “idea of the things that exist is just our idea of what we can observe” (pg. 15). This argues that reality is merely what we can observe, as opposed to the other views previously mentioned, which both doubt the legitimacy of the external world. Verificationism is an individual awaking from a dream and being able to distinguish when dreaming, and when hallucinating. It also states that if each person has a different perception of something they saw, there is no accurate perception of anything in reality.
Nagel’s last view was egocentric predicament. Egocentric predicament is the idea that individuals cannot see reality outside of their own perceptions and observations. Nagel supports this by stating “there may be no way out of the cage of your own mind” (pg. 17). He goes on to say that it is impossible to believe that all things in the world around us may or may not truly exist. He closes by taking the side that he believes everything does exist.
It is significantly easier to believe that the world exists and that the people we interact with are real as opposed to believing there is nothing else beyond our minds. It is pointless to dig for answers on this issue just like it is impossible to find, therefore leaving us to just

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    All these questions are questions asked in philosophy and deal with different views and approaches philosophers take to answer these practically impossible questions. Nagel in his book titled “What Does it all Mean?” tries to give certain viewpoints in how these questions may be answered, leaving them all open to interpretation. I will give my viewpoints on these philosophical questions, presenting my understanding and views…

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Struggles with Awareness To be fully real, one must first be recognized by another person of equal or higher prestige in society. Only through proving one’s self, can such awareness be achieved. In a typical Hegelian struggle, two equal opponents face one another and battle for dominance. One will succeed and become the Master, and one will fall short to become the Bondsman.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Regarding the relationship between the body and the mind, people cannot avoid two important philosophy concepts:, Physicalism, and Functionalism. Physicalism believes that the only substance exist is physical. Functionalism suggests that mental states are the internal cause of behavior.(Braddon-Mitchell&jackson p41). In this paper, I will mainly discuss four perspectives about Physicalism, Functionalism and the argument “ What is it like to be”. First, what’s Physicalism?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosopher Rene Descartes wrote an influential piece named the “Meditations on First Philosophy.” In this work, his “First Meditation” mainly deals with doubt of existence and how doubt is made possible because of sensory deception. He creates the dream argument that argues about how it is possible to be uncertain about whether or not a person is in a real world or dream world. In philosopher G.E. Moore’s “Certainty” he attempts to debunk Descartes’ argument through showing the inconsistencies in his dream argument. Since Descartes’ argument is built on inconsistency, Moore’s replies are satisfactory.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and contrast Camus’s, Nagel’s, and the existentialist’s (as set out by Sartre and De Beauvoir) positions on the meaning and value of human life. Which is the best supported position (be sure to give reasons for your judgment), and what problems does it still face? How might it respond to these problems? In this essay I will compare and contrast Camus’s, Nagel’s, and the existentialists’, specifically Sartre and De Beauvoir, positions on the meaning and value of human life.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why does Langton disagree, yet conclude that the question is ultimately unimportant? Answer: The four types of Solipsism are: Metaphysical Solipsism: It is a type of solipsism which states that individual self of an individual is a reality and the external world of that individual has no existence. Further, it claims that ‘I’ as the only existing conscious thing. Epistemological Solipsism: It states that existence of outside world is just an unusual hypothesis and based on false logics.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that Nagel 's primary conclusion in “What is it like to be a bat?” is that while there are multiple different forms of consciousness, humans cannot be sure of the presence of consciousness in lesser forms of animals, such as a bat. The “what it is like” for Nagel is reworded as being subjective character. The bat has subjective character, which is experience. Even though we know that bats hang upside down, have webbed arms and feet, and use echolocation, we will never truly know what it is like to be a bat. While we can all have thoughts on what it is like to be a bat, Nagel states that because everything has its own interpretation of itself, there is no way we can add specific information into our minds to actually see what it is…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In their work, The Extended Mind, Andy Clark and David Chalmers present the extended mind hypothesis to argue against the idea of the mind consisting solely of inputs and outputs. The hypothesis argues that the mind is not simply an internal thing, but rather that it can exist externally and be part of an individual’s environment. Clark and Chalmers argue for this this by presenting the examples of Otto, a man whose memories and knowledge lie in a notebook, and Inga someone who stores all the information in her mental states. I will argue that the extended mind hypothesis is unsuccessful because there is no clear line of what is actually known and what is only thought to be known. The extended mind hypothesis is the argument that…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there was one article that really stuck out to me throughout the semester, it has to be Nagel’s “What Is It Like to Be a Bat”. It’s concept and philosophy fixed itself into me and I tried applying those ideas to other articles as we went on. This article addresses one of the big questions of consciousness that tends to float around when discussing philosophy, which is what is it like to be something other than yourself? It isn’t too often that you debate on whether or not something or someone is experiencing the same feelings obtained through the environment as you are.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler was a German art historian. In his 1916 essay on The Rise of Cubism he illustrates the struggles and failures on how the Cubist movement was developed, as well as the eventual success of the Cubists and why they achieved it. At the turn of the twentieth century many artists were experimenting because they were dissatisfied with the limitations of traditional methods of creating art. They tried all sorts of approaches, however a young Pablo Picasso, unlike the rest of them, chose a new direction, focusing only on the form of the object he was creating.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Berkeley argues that an objective reality does not exist. He argues for idealism, the belief that the external world does not exist and only the mind and ideas do, by arguing against materialism, that an objective reality does exist. Berkeley believes that an objective reality does not exist because of issues that come with materialism. However, his points do not make much sense as he relies on faulty ideas. He presents his argument by mentioning how materialism is unverifiable; that we cannot verify there is an objective reality, pointless; there is no need to posit an external world, and incoherent; our senses cannot be external objects.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is prime reality – the really real? I was thinking ‘What is reality’? I decided to look up the definition. “Reality is the conjectured state of things as they actually exist, rather than as they may appear or might be imagined. In a wider definition, reality includes everything that is and has been, whether or not it is observable or comprehensible.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Examined Life is a collection of various forms arguments from numerous philosophers on a range of topics Cornel West on the nature of truth and the courage to examine oneself, Avital Ronell discuss the limits of meaning, Singer speaks on applied ethics and consumption, Kwame Anthony Appiah on cosmopolitanism, Martha Nussbaum on justice and disability, Michael Hardt on the meaning of revolution in the US, Žižek on ecology, human waste and artificiality, and Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor on disability/impairment and the limits of individualism in America. In the first section of this paper I will attempt to classify each of these argument into the four type of arguments that Wilhoit’s presents in “A Briefs Guide to Writing Academic Argument” he explains four different types of academic arguments. Proposal arguments in generally speaking has 2 parts: a problem and a solution section (Wilhoit, 2009, p.240) in examined life I find two instances of this type of argument, Ronell’s “Meaning”, Singers “Ethics” and Martha Nussbuam’S “Justice” , in the following paragraphs I will attempt to support this claims with reason from the text and movie of Examined Life.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays