Understanding The Burr-Hamilton Duel Analysis

Improved Essays
Multiple actions took place that intensified the conflict between Hamilton and Burr that led to their famous duel. Many of those actions could have been avoided and would have had a different ending. Lin-Manuel Miranda's Hamilton: An American Musical and Joanne Freeman's article, Understanding the Burr-Hamilton Duel both include ways it could have been avoided. Once the conflict began, Hamilton and Burr could have avoided the duel, by Hamilton listening to Burr's advice, if Burr hadn't taken Philip Schulyer senate seat, and if Hamilton had simply apologized.
If Hamilton had listened to the first piece of advice that Burr offered him, many problems would have been avoided. In Aaron Burr, Sir Burr emphasized, "talk less, smile more/ don't let
…show more content…
In Hamilton's America: Understanding the Burr-Hamilton Duel, they claim " Hamilton could have ended the whole affair just by apologizing if he had inadvertently given Burr offense"(Hamilton's America). In other words, this video emphasizes the fact that there was more than enough time to apologize and avoid the duel from happening. Also, the idea that if Hamilton would have set his pride and ego aside, he wouldn't have had ended the way he did. Article Burr-Hamilton reports, "I should consider the execution of the plan as devoting the country and signing their own death" (James McHenry). Basically, this article claims that after Hamilton called Burr out throughout his campaign, others started to believe that he wasn't capable of being president of the United States. If Hamilton had simply kept his thoughts to himself, Burr would have not written the first letter to Hamilton. In Your Obedient Servant Burr states, "now you call me amoral/ a dangerous disgrace/ if you've got something to say/ name a time and place/ face to face" (Burr). Burr's statement is important because it is at this point where he becomes angry with Hamilton and what he had to say. Hamilton had called him out on many occasions and it was in this moment where Burr has had enough. Ego and pride, both too big for Hamilton to set aside and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jefferson was a strong believer in strict construction, which was abiding to what the Constitution specifically states, and not stretching its boundaries. This belief would affect the choices he made for this country. Hamilton believed in loose construction, which is the complete opposite of Jefferson’s idea, and was also pro-British, where Jefferson was pro-French. These disagreements would cause these two men to clash, causing Jefferson to step down since Washington was more influenced…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    General Burr

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Burr’s strong sense of determination secured his admission to Princeton at the age of thirteen as a junior and went on to graduate at the age of sixteen. Burr continued his studies and enjoyed reading about military history and as a result of colonial unrest in 1774, he took an interest in Constitutional Law. Burr had a promising career in practicing law until he learned of the Battle of Lexington and how the British shed the blood of his fellow countrymen. Burr had an overwhelming desire to do his part and serve in the Continental Army. Aaron Burr’s military career began and would be filled with defeat, victories and disappointment in his fellow officers and commanders.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton had wanted war, which Adams didn’t want, so Adams had threatened to resign his position as president…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, he blamed Hamilton for doing something bad to his reputation and eager to defend the morning of July 11, 1804. The duel ended when Burr shot Hamilton to death. The public was outraged. Burr fled New York and New Jersey but eventually went back to Washington, DC where he completed his term safe from prosecution. The indictments in the case never reached…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For whatever reason, the two men detested each other personally, a scorn that went far beyond the political disagreements that Hamilton and Jefferson had. And so when Hamilton saw that Burr had a chance of becoming President, he jumped in to stop it from happening. Choosing to argue for the election of one political rival over another, Hamilton…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In saying this, he is implying that he doesn’t trust the people and instead power should be entrusted to the wealthy elite, not only because they were more educated but above all because they were the ones most able to handle national debt. To explain, America had foreign debt as well as national debt to pay off. Hamilton’s play to pay off this debt was to establish credit by selling bonds from the Bank of the United States and collecting the money earned to pay back previous debt. By trusting the wealthy with the nation 's debt, Hamilton felt it would keep the government from collapsing because the wealthy would keep putting money into the bank as long as they weren’t losing any. To furthermore entrust America 's fate in the wealthy, Hamilton was a supporter of the Excise Whiskey Tax, the first tax imposed on domestic products, that directly targeted small farmers, who grew the grain that made whiskey.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For brevity, I will describe the factors behind three of these events: the Burr-Hamilton duel, Madison’s outright abhorrence towards assumption, and Washington’s retirement. The interview at Weehawken. Early on the morning of July 11, 1804, Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr met as they had previously arranged and exchanged pistol shots. Who fired first was and still is not clear, but Hamilton was mortally wounded by the encounter.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hamilton begins this essay by restating that it is an absolute fact that the present confederation, because of the manner in which it has been set up, is the "parent of anarchy," and that the delinquencies of the states of the Union are the "natural offspring" that will lead the country to civil war. From this point, Hamilton proceeds to hypothetically go through the consequences of a lack of a large, standing, national army. In Hamilton's opinion, the end would be a war between the states because the strongest state is likely to prevail in any disagreement with no national army to put the states in their proper place. This would be the violent death of the confederacy. The other alternative would the "natural death" - what Hamilton thought…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1804, once again, Alexander Hamilton helped another man defeat Burr in the election for President and it was rumored that Alexander Hamilton had said something unforgivably awful at a dinner party about Aaron Burr, who was not in attendance. When Burr heard about this he demanded to know what was said, but Hamilton would only evade the question. They exchanged letters that grew more and more heated, with Aaron Burr demanding a written apology and Alexander Hamilton claiming he did not recall the instance of insulting Burr. The slew of letters finally culminated in Aaron Burr demanding satisfaction through a duel. Alexander Hamilton did not want to accept, but felt he could not refuse, insofar as writing a pros and cons list in regards to the issue.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout this all-encompassing novel, Joseph J. Ellis is depicting what truly happened in prominent political events rather than the common ideas. He extensively goes into great depths rather than merely scraping the surface of these phenomenal affairs. Specifically, he elaborates on events such as the Duel between Hamilton and Burr, The Compromise of 1790, the plague of slavery, George Washington 's presidency, and the rocky friendship between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. It is more than apparent that Ellis wrote this novel to provide great insight as to what really occurred on some of the most monumental days of American History. On a July morning of 1804, renowned politicians Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton met near the modern-day…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In section 8.3, “A Letter to Alexander Hamilton Describing his Dilemma in the Disputed Presidential Election of 1800,” is a letter that James Bayard wrote to Alexander Hamilton. “It was Bayard’s vote that decided the election in favor of Jefferson,” not Burr. In this excerpt, James Bayard explains to Alexander Hamilton as to why he had voted for Jefferson in the Presidential Election. Since James Bayard is a Federalist it is quite odd that he had voted for Jefferson, so he felt like he had to explain himself to Alexander Hamilton, his party’s leader.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aaron Burr was President Thomas Jefferson's vice president. Both Hamilton and Burr had events in their lives that had unfolded along curiously parallel lines. Both were orphaned at an early age;…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lin-Manuel Miranda’s “Hamilton” derives its success in the musical industry not only for its entertainment, but also for accurately translating the history of Alexander Hamilton into a modern art that is relatable and cognizable for a new generation of learners. Though critics of the performance argue that too much focus is given to the personal elements of Hamilton’s life and tenure as a Founding Father, these elements are what make Hamilton a unique historical figure. If no attention was paid to his egotism and ambition, to his love affairs, or to his ongoing conflict with Aaron Burr, the substance of Hamilton’s life would be absent. Historically accurate and modern are not mutually exclusive terms. Admittedly, portraying the life of Alexander Hamilton through hip-hop complicates one’s understanding the musical as a piece of history.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison was a Virginian citizen and delegate, with the “easier path” of the two, he was raised “by a prosperous father, the wealthiest planter in Orange County”. Madison “had found purpose in the Revolution” after going to “the College of New Jersey (now Princeton)”, but “the bookish Virginian was a poor candidate for soldiering” so he moved his purpose to politics. Madison “was not only short and slight---no taller than five feet six inches and a bit over one hundred pounds”, he also suffered from an illness that resembled epilepsy. Madison was a unsocial, quiet, semi-hypocritical, non-narcissistic, sharp, unobtrusive man. Hamilton on the other hand, was “born on the island of Nevis, a flyspeck in the Caribbean”, and didn’t arrive in America until he was fourteen, when a “local businessman sent him to mainland America for formal education, first at a New Jersey academy and then at Kings College, now Columbia University.”…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However through out the book Aaron burr is focus on more and is shone I a more positive light than hamilton. Even though burr truly was the villian in history fleming compares the two in order to put on the same level in terms of morality whenin truth they were not on the same level at all. Then fleming uses jealousy to bad mouth hamilton stating that burrs realtionship with the federalist made hamilton uncomfortable. Near the end fleming attempts to persaude the reader into beleving that hamilton crossed the line by bad mouthing burr during his run for governer and also looks to fool readers into feeling pitty in burr due to the fact he had to run in exile. With all this fleming also fails to acknolegde many of the crimes burr has commited.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays