Animal Testing Is Illegal

Improved Essays
“Right now, millions of animals are imprisoned in laboratories, where they are experimented on and live in constant pain as well as fear of when the next horrible procedure will occur. In addition to being cruel, these experiments are irrelevant to humans.” (Salvona ) Tormenting these underprivileged animals to unnecessary research testing is unethical. Not to mention experimenting on defenseless animals is immoral. Animal testing is unethical, unreliable and can be placed with alternatives. In laboratories all over the world, there are several animals imprisoned in small cages only to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, brain-damaged, and addicted to drugs. Scientists inject artificial diseases in animals …show more content…
Thomas Hartung, a professor at Johns Hopkins University who experts in evidence-based toxicology, argues that there are alternatives to animal testing. "We are not 70 kg rats." (Perkel,) Anatomically mice and rats are much smaller than humans. When testing, vaccinations for a disease they receive a smaller dosage than humans receive. Drug and immunization vaccine tests on animals do not produce accurate results. In some cases, the drug is accurate in animals, but when approved and sold to consumers, but the drug is ruled unsafe. For example, when preforming experimental tests on the drug Vioxx to treat arthritis, the animal subjects used showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, but the drug had caused more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market.” (Neavs) Another example of inaccurate results in early animal testing would be in the 1950’s lab animals tested a sleeping pill called Thalidomide and it was successful within the lab, but later there were 10,000 cases of babies born with severe birth deformities. …show more content…
A lab technician can fail when researchers produce biases in lab, causing flaws to occur in the experiments. In 2009, a study found major flaws in a majority of publicly funded animal studies in the US and UK primarily when using rodents and primates. 87% of the studies were unsuccessful because researchers had used a technique that reduces "selection bias” which required randomizing the selection of animals. 86% of the experiments did not use "blinding”, another technique to reduce biased research. (Kilkenny). The FDA reports that 92% of drugs approved for testing in humans fail to receive approval for human use.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, prior to the article I did not contemplate or think about the issue or even its effectiveness. One thing in which I was surprised by was some of the statistics that was mentioned throughout the article. For example, I was unaware that out of all the drugs that pass animal tests, about 94 percent will fail clinical trials for humans. Majority of drugs that pass animal tests are often discarded immediately due to being deemed useless or harmful to humans, which is one of the reasons why activists contemplates that animal testing is useless (Stachura, 2008).…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A possible concern is that over 100 million animals- mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds- are used for research and experiments each year. These animals are forced to test poisoning for burning skin, toxicity testing, causing brain damage, and many other horrible tests. The innocent creatures are harmed and sometimes killed in the process. On the other hand, scientists are doing these many different types of tests to learn more about health problems that affect both humans and animals. Since animals are biologically related to humans, it makes them good research subjects.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year, more than 100 million animals are being tested with products to help cure an illness, or are helping to better the life of humans. If these products work, then it is a success, but if they do not work it hurts the animal’s and it puts them in danger. Many may say it is a good thing because the products are being tested before handing them to a human. Animal testing is that it is wrong and dangerous and especially for the safety of medications for human consumption.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some doctors and scientists believe animal testing is not the best method for medical advances for many reasons and examples. In multiple cases, certain drugs have proven effective on animals but are not effective on humans. This occurs most often when testing drugs for stroke. Others include the following examples: a therapeutic dose of aspirin in a human is poisonous, but it has no negative effects to different animals; benzene causes leukemia in humans but not in mice; insulin produces birth defects in humans but not in animals; morphine calms people but excites some animals; chloramphenicol produces aplastic anemia in some humans but saves animals; fenclozic acid causes liver toxicity in people but not in some animals; penicillin is highly poisonous to a few animals but helps humans (Gorman 49).…

    • 1858 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, “Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease"(Cruelty-Free International Organisation). Experimenters are attempting to mirror human diseases by artificially creating symptoms in different species of animals, resulting in extremely inaccurate test results. Not only will it affect future test results, but it will also be dangerous for those who use the products. In addition, based on U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, nine out of ten experimental drugs are unsuccessful in clinical studies because experimenters cannot precisely predict how tests on animal species will perform in people, according to laboratory and animal studies.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bailey, Matthew R. “It's Time to End Ineffective And Cruel Animal Testing.” Wall Street Journal, 09 Oct 2017, PP. 16A. Matthew R. Bailey, in his newspaper article “It's Time to End Ineffective And Cruel Animal Testing” (2017), the author argues that testing drugs on animals is ineffective and claims animal lovers favor research that saves animals lives instead of killing them. In order for Bailey to get his point across, he states “Testing drugs on animals is notoriously ineffective. Not only do laboratory animals suffer from confinement and research procedures, but because they present different biologies and physiologies, different species (and even breeds within a species) respond differently to various substances.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many products that are tested are tested for safety reasons. According to the FDA about 48% of animal drug testing is successful The Biomedical Research Association has said that almost every single medical breakthrough in the past 100 years has directly come from animal research. While this may be true, however, it also shows that 52% of animal drug tests fail. Thus, animal testing is not valid a majority of the time.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ineffectiveness of Animal Testing in the Medical Field Experimenting on animals for knowledge in the scientific field is not something newly developed. Aristotle in 300 BC was known for dissecting animals and then making hypotheses about what he discovered in their anatomy. Even in current modern society, learning is done through animal experimentation and dissection. Almost as if a rite of passage, most students in high school will dissect either a worm or cat to help with their learning process and to develop their skill in the scientific method. Some scientists still believe in using animal testing for new drugs, drugs that are put on the market for the general populace to consume.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vioxx was first tested in monkeys with no side effects noticed. “When this drug was used in humans, it caused about 320,000 strokes and heart attacks and about 140,000 deaths worldwide”. (Arguments against animal testing) Another drug that was first tested using animals before it was released for commercial use was the “1950s sleeping pill thalidomide, which caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe deformities”. (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific Testing? 5)…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History Of Animal Testing

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animal testing has been around for a long time with some unpleasant history. With the expertise in technology not being as advanced and innovative as it is today with using other alternative methods, scientists had tested their theories on animals. Animals used in research experiments go back to the early Greek physician scientists such as Aristotle, Erasistratus and Galen. Galen practiced in Rome, where he conducted animal experiments to develop the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology and pharmacology. An Arab physician in the 12th century Moorish Spain also engaged in animal research carrying out certain tests.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing “Over 100 million animals are burned, poisoned, and abused in the United States labs every year” (11 Facts About Animal Testing). “The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) does not cover rats, mice, fish, and birds; which compromise around 95% of the animals used in research. It leaves 25 other animals uncovered. These animals are especially vulnerable to mistreatment and abuse without the protection of the AWA” (Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Cosmetic Testing?). Animal activists today are fighting and raising awareness in order to stop animal testing across the globe.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals In Animal Testing

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people against animal testing are unaware that when animals are used for testing they are protected under federal law. Labs are tested extensively and research protocols are reviewed regularly. An article from the National Institutes of Health states that only experiments necessary to people’s health are done and the research is done with the minimal number of test subjects possible. All of the animals are treated “humanely and undergo the least distress possible”.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of animals are put through unavailing animal tests each year, and most of them suffer abuse that is senseless because most tests are inaccurate. Peggy Carlson, an animal rights activist and head of the humane society argues “Nearly everything that medicine has learned about what substances cause human cancer and birth defects has come from human clinical and epidemiological studies because animal experiments do not accurately predict what occurs in humans” (161). In other words animals are being used and abused in tests that are not even projecting similar results as they would if humans were to do the test. Scientists say animals are used in testing because they are similar to humans in many ways. The truth is, they are similar to humans in many ways, but we are not exactly identical and also have many differences that affect test results.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics