Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects. These research and development projects consist of medical treatments, determining the harmfulness of medicines, and inspecting the safety of products. By the mid-19th centuries, movements that prevented animal cruelty spread in Europe causing governments to pass related laws. In fact, organizations such as, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and similar groups, focus on the fact that animals have fundamental rights just as humans do. Testing on animals should not be lawful because it is corrupt in an abundance of ways.
First, animal experimenting is tremendously inhumane for extreme reasons. Animal experimentation is often agonizing …show more content…
Humans have a far more complex body than animals instigating the tests to be less dependable. “Just because a certain medication has the desired effect on mice, for instance, does not mean it can be neatly translated into human form to achieve the same result to a much more complicated body” (Klazema). Performing these experiments can result in a greater danger of infection, excruciating pain, or even death. To conclude, testing on animals is not worth the possible risks. Furthermore, the results that animals may have with the tests are not likely to be the same for humans. No matter how similar an animal can be to a human, there are always huge risks that can happen. April Klazema states, “A sleeping pill tested on animals in the 50s caused thousands of babies to be born with birth defects, while a heart pill tested on mice was released to the public only to cause nearly 30,000 heart attacks” (qtd. in Animal). Due to the differences of human and animal bodies, these medicines had completely diverse outcomes. In other words, experimenting on animals is likely to be misleading and dangerous to humans. Conducting on animals is hazardous, however if other methods were used, the results may be more …show more content…
Many alternatives have proved to be harmless and more trustworthy than animal experimentation. “Researches can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial ‘skin’ instead of testing on animals” (Dunnuck). Again, now that there are alternatives for testing product security there is no longer a need for experimenting on animals. Therefore, one can claim that using animals for tests is no longer essential. Now scientists do not have to test animals or humans to examine the care of products. Recognitions to these supplementary alternatives, scientists can use vitro testing. “Thanks to Vitro testing, which involves studying cells in a Petri dish, we can identify how cells might respond to drugs without actually having to use a live creature of any kind” (Klazema). Vitro testing uses human cells, giving extremely reliable results and is not at all dangerous. Using alternative tests keeps both animals and humans away from harm. In conclusion, other methods to animal testing are immensely safer and more trustworthy.
Experimentation on helpless animals is unethical and needs to be illegal. Since animals do not have the same rights as humans, they are compelled to test even unnecessary tests. The human and animal bodies are so complex from each other that test results are harmful. Due to their being other techniques to test products, there is no longer a need to use living beings.
First, animal experimenting is tremendously inhumane for extreme reasons. Animal experimentation is often agonizing …show more content…
Humans have a far more complex body than animals instigating the tests to be less dependable. “Just because a certain medication has the desired effect on mice, for instance, does not mean it can be neatly translated into human form to achieve the same result to a much more complicated body” (Klazema). Performing these experiments can result in a greater danger of infection, excruciating pain, or even death. To conclude, testing on animals is not worth the possible risks. Furthermore, the results that animals may have with the tests are not likely to be the same for humans. No matter how similar an animal can be to a human, there are always huge risks that can happen. April Klazema states, “A sleeping pill tested on animals in the 50s caused thousands of babies to be born with birth defects, while a heart pill tested on mice was released to the public only to cause nearly 30,000 heart attacks” (qtd. in Animal). Due to the differences of human and animal bodies, these medicines had completely diverse outcomes. In other words, experimenting on animals is likely to be misleading and dangerous to humans. Conducting on animals is hazardous, however if other methods were used, the results may be more …show more content…
Many alternatives have proved to be harmless and more trustworthy than animal experimentation. “Researches can test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial ‘skin’ instead of testing on animals” (Dunnuck). Again, now that there are alternatives for testing product security there is no longer a need for experimenting on animals. Therefore, one can claim that using animals for tests is no longer essential. Now scientists do not have to test animals or humans to examine the care of products. Recognitions to these supplementary alternatives, scientists can use vitro testing. “Thanks to Vitro testing, which involves studying cells in a Petri dish, we can identify how cells might respond to drugs without actually having to use a live creature of any kind” (Klazema). Vitro testing uses human cells, giving extremely reliable results and is not at all dangerous. Using alternative tests keeps both animals and humans away from harm. In conclusion, other methods to animal testing are immensely safer and more trustworthy.
Experimentation on helpless animals is unethical and needs to be illegal. Since animals do not have the same rights as humans, they are compelled to test even unnecessary tests. The human and animal bodies are so complex from each other that test results are harmful. Due to their being other techniques to test products, there is no longer a need to use living beings.