Thomas Hobbes Theory Of The Laws Of Nature

Improved Essays
Thomas Hobbes’ theory of the “laws of nature,” is law that is determined by natural rights, or a common rule. He speaks of nineteen laws of nature that derive from the rights of nature or the natural instinct of self-protection. The laws of nature are created in everyone’s self-interest, without them there would be no protection by a third party, only that which a person could provide for themselves. He believes that in a man’s natural state, or human nature, there are no morals, therefore man will do anything to accomplish their desires. Hobbes’ uses the “golden rule,” but adapts it to his own translation, “do not that to another, which thou wouldest not have done to thy selfe.” This changes the rule drastically in the eyes of many, instead …show more content…
People want power to protect themselves, not for the sole fact of having power, but having enough power. He also says conflict comes from fear, fear that what you have could possibly be taken from you from others seeking power. People will also fight for honor over slander or arguments. When Hobbes speaks of human nature, he implies that there are certain elements that people strive for; competition, diffidence, and honor. Without these three components, man would have anarchy, these provide the grounds for a government or third party to watch over and protect a society. Each of the laws of nature described by Hobbes can be directly associated with a right of nature. For example, the first law of nature is that every man should venture for peace. This leads to the right of nature, when peace cannot be obtained, man must turn to war. The second law states that man should be willing to lay down his natural rights in order to create a compact, right of nature is refusing to lay down more or less than another person will, or the desire to be equivalent in the eyes of the …show more content…
This is because human nature is to do everything you can to achieve what you want in life whether it is morally right or wrong. If a person’s self interest is to rid the world of a certain ethnicity or religion, he might take to killing people in order to reach his goal. This is morally wrong, but it is in his self interest to do so. Hobbes claims that fear and hope propel humans in their quest of life and this is true, because of the fact that people will do everything in their power to obtain what they want out of life, this is why the laws of nature must be upheld. Without them, humans would act regardless of the fear or hope. A quote from the movie The Hunger Games says, “Hope. It is the only thing stronger than fear. A little hope is effective. A lot of hope is dangerous. A spark is fine, as long as it 's contained.” This is true because without hope, fear would take over the minds of people, and hinder their actions, but hope keeps their dreams alive, pushing them to achieve what they want out of life. When people contain too much hope, they might have the idea to rebelle or attempt an overthrow of the government, this is why we have government. The government uses laws to contain the hope of it’s people, while allowing them a glimpse of light to keep them

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meng Tzu Case Study

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In that state of nature we respond to others in three different ways. First, competition, which is what we invade to take what another has for ourselves. Second, diffidence, which is when we fear another and have a desire for safety in order to retain what we already have. Lastly, the strife for glory, which is when we worry about appearing significant in another’s eyes. A society with laws and moral codes can be instituted from a state of nature because Hobbes believed a society is formed is due to fear and the desire for security.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Hobbes, man’s life in the state of nature was one of fear and selfishness. He believes man natural liberty must be limited because, “all mankind [has] a perpetuall and restlesse desire of Power after power, that ceaseth onely in Death”. Under Hobbes philosophies, a social contract focuses man to surrender all their rights and freedoms to an authority. This authority will then protect the lives and properties of the people. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen establishes Hobbes often discussed “natural rights of man [which] are the sole causes of the miseries of the world”.…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How does Hobbes’s view of nature shape his political theory? Political theories make suppositions about nature and/or natural laws. These boundaries (including the behaviors of the people within it) shape actions and decision-making, and the rules of nature thusly form the foundation of the ideology. It is prudent to analyze in-depth this basis for the moral and political philosophy of the great thinkers. The assumptions must make sense if the overall theory of thought built upon this foundation is to hold up.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A little hope is effective. A lot of hope is dangerous. A spark is fine, as long as it's contained”. In the Hunger Games the strategy they used to suppress the hope of the people was threw the used of the games.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanity is wrong Humanity defines itself as Good and Evil, however do you really know what that means? Every human sees, perceives, and imagines the world differently, and this entails that one person has a different definition of good than another; Furthermore, we can take reference in the great philosopher Thomas Hobbes for his definition of natural law; and finally, William Golding’s book, Lord of the Flies, shows his point of view on human nature, but more importantly, he shows his readers how good is relative. Imagine a starving homeless family, do they have the right to steal food? They say yes, ontheotherhand the law and the average person says no.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes believes the source of conflict is self-preservation (p. 9), meaning that even though various causes of conflict appear in the state of nature, the underlying cause of conflict is self-preservation. He believes not only do humans want to survive in the present, but also they want to ensure their survival in the future. In order to survive in the future, humans need resources which leads to violent conflict with others. Hobbes paints a very messy picture of life. He explicitly states the need for a social contract, so that people aren’t always in conflict with one another (p. 13).…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    PS4217F Major Political Thinkers: Hobbes Assignment 1: What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Hobbes’ theory of civil order? Name: Denise Cher Yan Wen Matriculation Number: A0127001A Word Count: 1887 Introduction Hobbes’ theory of civil order is based on the fundamental law of nature, which is to seek peace (Hobbes 2012, 200). According to Hobbes, to seek peace is necessarily to seek peace in the condition of war, and justice is therefore a legal compliance with the terms of the social contract (Hobbes 2012, 220).…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes advocates for extensive government power to protect people from the state of nature. He thinks that everyone is a bully. Eventually, one particular bully proves to be stronger and able to bully more than others. At this point, the other bullies follow in line with this big bully which not only strengthens this bully, but also keeps the other bullies safe from the “lead” bully so to speak. Hobbes says that that is how government is formed.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No morality exists. Everyone lives in constant fear. Because of this fear, no one is really free. However, in the state of nature everyone has the right to everything because there is no limit to natural rights. His theory that common security should be favored and that a bit of individual liberty should be sacrificed by each person to achieve it is an inaccurate policy. Hobbes believes the contract is a mutual transferring of rights.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Views On Rebellion

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He believed that society in order to be successful had to be ruled by a strict system of government such as absolute monarchy. In Hobbes’s dissertation “The Leviathan”(1651) a book where he expresses his views he explains that a law of nature was "a precept, or general rule, found out by reason, by which a man is forbidden to do that which is destructive of his life” (Hobbes, 1651, ch14/XIV, p. 64). The law of nature was a broad principle which was discovered through experience and expected to be to be followed in everyday life. These laws encouraged self preservation and disapproved any doings damaging or negative to human life such a rebellions which could result in civil…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes wants the society to work together meaning giving some rights up in exchange for protection. “This equality of ability produces equality of hope for the attaining of our goals” (Thomas Hobbes). For example, if two people want something they both can’t enjoy or use then they quickly become enemies. Hobbes view, “A law of nature is a command or general rule, discovered by reason, which forbids a man to do anything that is destructive of his life or takes away his means for preserving his life, and forbids him to omit anything by which he thinks his life can best be preserved” (Leviathan, Chapter 14). Those who debate this subject often mistake right and law to be the same yet they ought to be distinguished.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An objection may say that, in state of nature since there is nothing just or unjust that people would not have any reason to go towards the idea of a political state and that people would not have to follow covenants although, the three laws help to show us why having a state of nature is not an ideal state. There should be a political state because no rational person would want to be in a state where competition is forever occurring, and death could occur at any moment due to someone wanting what you have. Hobbes uses natural laws, which is a general rule that man is forbidden to do because it is destructive to his life, to justify the being of a strong central…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays