Good And Evil: Are Humans Inherently Good Or Evil

Improved Essays
Everyday, people carry on with their lives knowing that there is both good and evil in the world. Some might distinguish the evil outweighing the good, while others spot the good outweighing the evil. Whichever side one might choose from this debate, it is natural that for humans to stop and wonder about humanity. A recurring controversy that crosses over a person's mind is whether humans are naturally and inherently good or, worse, they’re naturally and inherently evil. Society tends to lean on the idea that humans are selfish, in fact, 78% of the population believes others to be more selfish than they really are. Distinctly, one can determine that since none of the population can agree on whether or not humans are innately good or evil, we can visualize two opposing sides forming. …show more content…
Locke believed that humans would strive to go forward and advance in an absence of law and order, on the other hand, Hobbes believed that humans would be at constant war if left in a natural state. There seem to be two prominent sides in the debate over good versus evil, but there is also a diverse and expandable middle ground. Correspondingly humans are born neutral with a whole world to shape them into a person with evil tendencies or righteous tendencies. Subsequently humans are clean malleable slates that can be shaped by societal reactions, one’s environmental raising, and situations that one can find themselves in and how they are to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since the inception of humanity, the ongoing argument has reigned of whether man is basically evil or good. Accompanying this argument is the question: Does humanity have free will to act upon the universe as we please or are we fate’s puppet to do as fate deems worthy? In Loung Ung’s, First They Killed My Father and William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, both question and argument are laid to rest as both authors open the window to the human soul with the cruelty of humans and the differing opinions of good and evil. As philosopher Thomas Hobbes said, “Moral philosophy is nothing else but the science of what is good, and evil, in the conversation, and society of humanity.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke, a famous French philosopher, believed that people were naturally good, but English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, believed that humans were evil by nature. Both perspectives have credibility and validity to a certain extent. However, one common trend that can be traced through Arthur Miller’s The Crucible and modern American life is the prevalence of destructives forces such as hysteria, greed, and fear. Human nature can be good or evil based on which side of himself a person decides to work for. Because humans have continued to exhibit their good as well as evil nature one cannot exist without the other.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stereotypes In Bike Thief

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Humans are complex creatures, they have widely different personalities but, are they naturally good, with evil being taught, or is compassion taught and cruelty natural. Evidence suggests that humans are naturally sympathetic while antagonistic tendencies are taught. While there are some exceptions, almost all humans are born with empathy which is crucial to civilization as we know it. With few exceptions humans are born with empathy, while apathy and cruelty are learnt.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In both Thomas Hobbes Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government both describe “the state of nature”. However, for both authors the view point on the “natural instincts” humans possess differs in multiple ways. For Hobbes the state of nature deals with the savagery of Americans, lead to criminal activity and involves two natural passions while Locke’s state of nature involves a state of equality. Both Hobbes and Locke’s explanation of state of nature have aspects of natural law, both authors include ideas of natural law to keep order in the society. For Hobbes the passion of reason causes individuals to look for peace and they therefore develop natural law.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nature of Humanity is Surprisingly Good Recently, certain acts have been committed that have left people with the lingering question in their mind: Are humans naturally good or evil? As a whole, society may present itself as selfish and unwilling, but small individual acts of kindness have proven to make a difference on the overall view of human nature. In order to distinguish whether humans are naturally good or evil, a person must experience, themselves, the situations where genuine character is shown. When put in group situations, most will try to act cooperatively and make decisions based on what is best for the group as a whole.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Are Humans Born Morally Bad, Amoral, or Morally Good? Introduction The argument about whether humans are born morally bad, morally neutral, or morally good has been controversial for many years, with different philosophers proposing dissimilar perspectives. Plato believes that humans are born morally good.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Empathy, Inherent Evil

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Some argue for the case of inherent goodness that because people feel empathy, inherent evil does not exist. Every species on earth expresses empathy in some capacity; animals commiserate with one another over loss, some even practice zoomorphism and take in another kind as their own. Psychologist Bruce Perry explains how evil can take root in someone who considers themselves empathetic, “‘You can have people who have a well-developed capacity for empathy, relating, who are very close to their friends, but who have been raised in an ideology that teaches them that people of another religion, color or ethnic group are bad’”(qtd in Begley). Some people in certain cultures and circumstances have grown up with or have adopted very provincial points…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kolbe Perez Mrs. Martinez English II Period I 31 March 2015 Title Two very different kinds of people exist in the world, people who are good and people who are evil. Good people contribute to society, give their best effort, show limitless curiosity, and a yearning to succeed. On the contrary, the evil make it their goal to ignore good people and inflict suffering upon them.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J.D. Stroube wrote in Caged by Damnation that, “Life is filled with unanswered questions, but it is the courage to seek those answers that continues to give meaning to life. You can spend your life wallowing in despair, wondering why you were the one who was led towards the road strewn with pain, or you can be grateful that you are strong enough to survive it.” One of the unanswered questions I have had to contemplate these past nine weeks is, “Are humans inherently good or bad?” To answer this question many others come about like, “Is morality due to the influence of society or was society only created as a guideline to our morality.” Morals are a person's standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many argue the social sciences cannot undo our natural instinct to choose good and evil, the social sciences have ultimately killed off free will. While there are many who believe the human species is innately good and will do anything in their power to choose good over evil, the social sciences have greatly diminished the effects of free will. When given the choice between good and evil, we are most likely to choose good. If the decision is based in free will, and therefore comes from…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Renaissance people shifted their focus to explore themselves. Humanistic values became more and more common in this time period. Philosophical thinkers were hard at work exploring the questions of life. One of the main questions is one that is still addressed today. The question is whether or not human nature is inherently good or evil.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are all born as good but what make a person good or bad are the choices he or she makes in life. When a baby is born he is not born with the intent to do evil. The baby is born with the intent to learn and gain knowledge to make the decision of their role in life. It is in the early stages of life when a person finds themselves. A person is born with a clean slate then the person they will become is determined but, not written in stone.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, the human race has struggled with whether it is essentially good or inherently evil. Even the greatest minds have had difficulty finding a definitive answer to this perplexing conundrum. Saint Augustine of Hippo, Hobbes, and Nietzsche all pondered this and were unable to come up with a simple answer. Fortunately, the debate that has lasted for millennia is coming to a halt. However, in order to successfully analyze the ways of humankind, a clear framework must be established.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coincidently, Locke’s hypocrisy promotes Thomas Hobbes’ idea that people only strive for power, and will do whatever it takes to sustain that power (Hobbes, 1651 & Locke, 1689). In the end, the idea of human nature is inevitable subjective to each and every person and their philosophical…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each individual has a different understanding of what the word “bad” or “evil” mean. If one person believes that stealing is bad, another person might believe that stealing is a good thing if it serves the greater good, for example, Robin Hood. The words “bad” and “good” are subjective and can vary in people’s views. Yet, by looking at the world today, it is difficult to say that humans are naturally good. However, when a child is brought into this world, one tends to associate them with purity and innocence.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays