Locke believed that humans would strive to go forward and advance in an absence of law and order, on the other hand, Hobbes believed that humans would be at constant war if left in a natural state. There seem to be two prominent sides in the debate over good versus evil, but there is also a diverse and expandable middle ground. Correspondingly humans are born neutral with a whole world to shape them into a person with evil tendencies or righteous tendencies. Subsequently humans are clean malleable slates that can be shaped by societal reactions, one’s environmental raising, and situations that one can find themselves in and how they are to
Locke believed that humans would strive to go forward and advance in an absence of law and order, on the other hand, Hobbes believed that humans would be at constant war if left in a natural state. There seem to be two prominent sides in the debate over good versus evil, but there is also a diverse and expandable middle ground. Correspondingly humans are born neutral with a whole world to shape them into a person with evil tendencies or righteous tendencies. Subsequently humans are clean malleable slates that can be shaped by societal reactions, one’s environmental raising, and situations that one can find themselves in and how they are to